Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quantum Pseudo-Telepathy

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantum information processing is at the crossroads of physics, mathematics and computer science. It is concerned with what we can and cannot do with quantum information that goes beyond the abilities of classical information processing devices. Communication complexity is an area of classical computer science that aims at quantifying the amount of communication necessary to solve distributed computational problems. Quantum communication complexity uses quantum mechanics to reduce the amount of communication that would be classically required.

Pseudo-telepathy is a surprising application of quantum information processing to communication complexity. Thanks to entanglement, perhaps the most nonclassical manifestation of quantum mechanics, two or more quantum players can accomplish a distributed task with no need for communication whatsoever, which would be an impossible feat for classical players. After a detailed overview of the principle and purpose of pseudo-telepathy, we present a survey of recent and not-so-recent work on the subject. In particular, we describe and analyse all the pseudo-telepathy games currently known to the authors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Einstein B. Podolsky N. Rosen (1935) ArticleTitle“Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?” Phys. Rev 47 777–780 Occurrence Handle10.1103/PhysRev.47.777 Occurrence Handle1935PhRv...47..777E

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. J.S. Bell (1964) ArticleTitle“On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox” Physics 1 IssueID3 195–200

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Aspect P. Grangier G. Roger (1981) ArticleTitle“Experimental tests of realistic local theories via Bell’s theorem” Phys. Rev. Lett 47 460–463 Occurrence Handle10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.460 Occurrence Handle1981PhRvL..47..460A

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Aspect P. Grangier G. Roger (1982) ArticleTitle“Experimental realization of Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen–Bohm gedankenexperiment: A new violation of Bell’s inequalities” Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 91–94 Occurrence Handle1982PhRvL..49...91A

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Aspect J. Dalibard G. Roger (1982) ArticleTitle“Experimental test of Bell’s inequalities using time–varying analyzers” Phys. Rev. Lett 49 1804–1807 Occurrence Handle1982PhRvL..49.1804A Occurrence Handle84c:81001

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. W. Tittel J. Brendel H. Zbinden N. Gisin (1998) ArticleTitle“Violation of Bell inequalities by photons more than 10 km apart” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 IssueID17 3563–3566 Occurrence Handle10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3563 Occurrence Handle1998PhRvL..81.3563T

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Zbinden J. Brendel N. Gisin W. Tittel (2001) ArticleTitle“Experimental test of non-local quantum correlations in relativistic configurations” Phys. Rev. A 63 022111 Occurrence Handle10.1103/PhysRevA.63.022111 Occurrence Handle2001PhRvA..63b2111Z

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. N.D. Mermin (1981) ArticleTitle“Bringing home the atomic world: Quantum mysteries for anybody” Am. J. Phys. 49 940–943 Occurrence Handle10.1119/1.12594 Occurrence Handle1981AmJPh..49..940M

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. D.M. Greenberger, M. A. Horne, and A. Zeilinger, “Going beyond Bell’s theorem”. in Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe: M. Kafatos, ed.(Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1989), pp. 69–72.

  10. L. Hardy (1992) ArticleTitle“Quantum mechanics, local realistic theories, and Lorentz-invariant realistic theories” Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 IssueID20 2981–2984 Occurrence Handle10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.2981 Occurrence Handle1992PhRvL..68.2981H Occurrence Handle0969.81500 Occurrence Handle93d:81008

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. G. Brassard A. Méthot A. Tapp (2005) ArticleTitle“Minimum entangled state dimension required for pseudo-telepathy” Quantum Inf. Comp. 5 IssueID(4–5 275–284

    Google Scholar 

  12. Z.-B. Chen J.-W. Pan Y.-D. Zhang C. Brukner A. Zeilinger (2003) ArticleTitle“All-versus-nothing violation of local realism for two entangled photons” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 160408 Occurrence Handle2003PhRvL..90p0408C

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Peres (2000) ArticleTitleBayesian analysis of Bell inequalities” Fortschr. Phys. 48 IssueID(5–7 531–535 Occurrence Handle2000PrPh...48..531P Occurrence Handle01581562

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Yao A.C.-C. “Quantum circuit complexity”. Proceedings of the 34th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science: pp. 222–227 (1993).

  15. P. Heywood M.L.G. Redhead (1983) ArticleTitle“Nonlocality and the Kochen–Specker paradox” Found. Phys. 13 IssueID5 481–499 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00729511 Occurrence Handle86e:81007

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. G. Brassard (2003) ArticleTitle“Quantum communication complexity” Found. Phys. 33 IssueID11 1593–1616 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1026009100467 Occurrence Handle2004k:81039

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. N. Gisin H. Zbinden (1999) ArticleTitle“Bell inequality and the locality loophole: Active versus passive switches” Phys. Lett. A 264 IssueID2–3 103–107 Occurrence Handle1999PhLA..264..103G Occurrence Handle2000k:81033

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Massar (2002) ArticleTitle“Nonlocality, closing the detection loophole, and communication complexity” Phys. Rev. A 65 032121 Occurrence Handle10.1103/PhysRevA.65.032121 Occurrence Handle2002PhRvA..65c2121M Occurrence Handle2004a:81016

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Barrett D. Collins L. Hardy A. Kent S. Popescu (2002) ArticleTitlenonlocality, Bell inequalities and the memory loophole” Phys. Rev. A 66 042111 Occurrence Handle10.1103/PhysRevA.66.042111 Occurrence Handle2002PhRvA..66d2111B

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. S. Massar S. Pironio (2003) ArticleTitle“Violation of local realism versus detection efficiency” Phys. Rev. A 68 062109 Occurrence Handle10.1103/PhysRevA.68.062109 Occurrence Handle2003PhRvA..68f2109M

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. M.A. Nielsen I.L. Chuang (2000) Quantum Computation and Quantum Information Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. Kochen E.P. Specker (1967) ArticleTitleThe problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics” J. Math. Mech. 17 59–87 Occurrence Handle36 #2363

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. J.S. Bell (1966) ArticleTitleOn the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics” Rev. Mod. Phys. 38 IssueID3 447–452 Occurrence Handle10.1103/RevModPhys.38.447 Occurrence Handle1966RvMP...38..447B Occurrence Handle0152.23605

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. E. Specker (1960) ArticleTitle“Die Logik nicht gleichzeitig entscheidbarer Aussagen” Dialectica 14 239–246 Occurrence Handle22 #6715

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. A. Gleason (1957) ArticleTitle“Measures on the closed subspaces of a Hilbert space” J. Math. Mech. 6 885–893 Occurrence Handle0078.28803 Occurrence Handle20 #2609

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. N.D. Mermin (1990) ArticleTitleQuantum mysteries revisited Am. J. Phys. 58 IssueID8 731–734 Occurrence Handle10.1119/1.16503 Occurrence Handle1990AmJPh..58..731M Occurrence Handle91e:81009

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. A. Peres (1993) Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. Cleve, P. Hoyer, B. Toner, and J. Watrous, “Consequences and limits of nonlocal strategies”. Proceedings of the 19th IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity: pp. 236–249 (2004).

  29. R. Renner and S. Wolf, “Quantum pseudo-telepathy and the Kochen–Specker theorem”. Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory: p. 322 (2004).

  30. J. Zimba R. Penrose (1993) ArticleTitleOn Bell non-locality without probabilities: More curious geometry” Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 24 IssueID5 697–720 Occurrence Handle94k:81021

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. P.K. Aravind (1999) ArticleTitle“Impossible colorings and Bell’s theorem” Phys. Lett. A 262 IssueID4–5 282–286 Occurrence Handle1999PhLA..262..282A Occurrence Handle1044.81534 Occurrence Handle2000j:81020

    ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. J.E. Massad P.K. Aravind (1999) ArticleTitle“The Penrose dodecahedron revisited” Am. J. Phys. 67 IssueID7 631–638 Occurrence Handle10.1119/1.19336 Occurrence Handle1999AmJPh..67..631M Occurrence Handle2000d:81004

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. D.M. Greenberger M.A. Horne A. Shimony A. Zeilinger (1990) ArticleTitle“Bell’s theorem without inequalities” Am J. Phys. 58 IssueID12 1131–1143 Occurrence Handle10.1119/1.16243 Occurrence Handle1990AmJPh..58.1131G Occurrence Handle91k:81017

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. N.D. Mermin (1990) ArticleTitle“What’s wrong with these elements of reality?” Phys. Today 43 9–11

    Google Scholar 

  35. N.D. Mermin (1990) ArticleTitle“Extreme quantum entanglement in a superposition of macroscopically distinct states” Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 IssueID15 1838–1849 Occurrence Handle10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1838 Occurrence Handle1990PhRvL..65.1838M Occurrence Handle0971.81507 Occurrence Handle91f:81018

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. G.Brassard, A. Broadbent, and A. Tapp, “Multi-party pseudo-telepathy”. Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Algorithms and Data Structures: Volume 2748 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science: pp. 1–11 (2003).

  37. G. Brassard, A. Broadbent, and A. Tapp, “Recasting Mermin’s multi-player game into the framework of pseudo-telepathy”. Quantum Inf. Comp. 5 (7), (2005).

  38. H. Buhrman P. Hoyer S. Massar H. Röhrig (2003) ArticleTitle“Combinatorics and quantum nonlocality” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 IssueID4 047903 Occurrence Handle10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.047903 Occurrence Handle2003PhRvL..91d7903B

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. A. Broadbent, Quantum Pseudo-Telepathy Games, M.Sc. thesis, Université de Montréal, 2004.

  40. D. Deutsch and R. Jozsa, “Rapid solution of problems by quantum computation”. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 439: 553–558 (1992).

  41. G. Brassard R. Cleve A. Tapp (1999) ArticleTitle“Cost of exactly simulating quantum entanglement with classical communication” Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 IssueID9 1874–1878 Occurrence Handle10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1874 Occurrence Handle1999PhRvL..83.1874B

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. H. Buhrman, R. Cleve, and A. Wigderson, “Quantum vs. classical communication and computation”. Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing: pp. 63–68 (1998).

  43. M. W. Newman, Independent Sets and Eigenspaces, Ph.D. thesis, University of Waterloo, 2004.

  44. V. Galliard and S. Wolf, “Pseudo-telepathy, entanglement and graph colorings”. Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory: p. 101 (2002).

  45. V. Galliard, A. Tapp, and S. Wolf, “The impossibility of pseudo-telepathy without quantum entanglement”. Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory: p. 457 (2003). Full paper available as arXiv:quant-ph/0211011 (November 2002).

  46. P.K. Aravind (2002) ArticleTitle“Bell’s theorem without inequalities and only two distant observers” Found. Phys. Lett. 15 IssueID4 397–405 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1021272729475 Occurrence Handle2003f:81016

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. P.K. Aravind (2004) ArticleTitle“Quantum mysteries revisited again” Am. J. Phys 72 1303–1307 Occurrence Handle10.1119/1.1773173 Occurrence Handle2086837

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  48. N.D. Mermin (1990) ArticleTitle“Simple unified form for the major no-hidden-variables theorems” Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 IssueID27 3373–3376 Occurrence Handle10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.3373 Occurrence Handle1990PhRvL..65.3373M Occurrence Handle0971.81501 Occurrence Handle92b:81017

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  49. A. Cabello (2001) ArticleTitle“Bell’s theorem without inequalities and without probabilities for two observers” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 IssueID10 1911–1914 Occurrence Handle10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1911 Occurrence Handle2001PhRvL..86.1911C Occurrence Handle2001m:81030

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  50. A. Cabello (2001) ArticleTitleAll versus nothing inseparability for two observers” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 IssueID1 010403 Occurrence Handle10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.010403 Occurrence Handle2001PhRvL..87a0403C Occurrence Handle2001m:81030

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  51. H. Buhrman and I. Kerenidis, January 2004 (private communication).

  52. Z. Bar-Yossef, T. S. Jayram, and I. Kerenidis, “Exponential separation of quantum and classical one-way communication complexity”. Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing: pp. 128–137 (2004).

  53. D.P. DiVincenzo A. Peres (1997) ArticleTitle“Quantum code words contradict local realism” Phys. Rev. A 55 IssueID6 4089–4092 Occurrence Handle10.1103/PhysRevA.55.4089 Occurrence Handle1997PhRvA..55.4089D

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. M. Boyer, “Extended GHZ n-player games with classical probability of winning tending to 0”. available as arXiv:quant-ph/0408090 (August 2004).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Département IRO, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, succursale centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H3C 3J7

    Gilles Brassard, Anne Broadbent & Alain Tapp

Authors
  1. Gilles Brassard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anne Broadbent
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alain Tapp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gilles Brassard.

Additional information

Supported in Part by Canada’s Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), the Canada Research Chair programme and the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIAR).

Supported in part by a scholarship from Canada’s NSERC.

Supported in part by Canada’s NSERC

Québec’s Fonds de recherche sur la nature et les technologies (FQRNT), the CIAR and the Mathematics of Information Technology and Complex Systems Network (MITACS).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brassard, G., Broadbent, A. & Tapp, A. Quantum Pseudo-Telepathy. Found Phys 35, 1877–1907 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-005-7353-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-005-7353-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation