Nonlocality and Information Flow: The Approach of Deutsch and Hayden
Deutsch and Hayden claim to have provided an account of quantum mechanics which is particularly local, and which clarifies the nature of information transmission in entangled quantum systems. In this paper, a perspicuous description of their formalism is offered and their claim assessed. It proves essential to distinguish, as Deutsch and Hayden do not, between two ways of interpreting the formalism. On the first, conservative, interpretation, no benefits with respect to locality accrue that are not already available on either an Everettian or a statistical interpretation; and the conclusions regarding information flow are equivocal. The second, ontological, interpretation, offers a framework with the novel feature that global properties of quantum systems are reduced to local ones; but no conclusions follow concerning information flow in more standard quantum mechanics.
KeywordsDeutsch--Hayden information flow entanglement locally inaccessible information nonlocality
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 4.Redhead, M. L. G. 1987Incompleteness Non-Locality and RealismOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
- 5.Maudlin, T. 2002Quantum Non-Locality and RelativityBlackwell Publishers Ltd.Oxford, second ednGoogle Scholar
- 10.Schilpp, P. A. 1979Autobiographical NotesEinstein, Albert eds. Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist in The Library of Living PhilosophersOpen Court Publishing CompanyLa Salle, IllinoisFirst published in P. A. Schilpp, ed.Google Scholar
- 12.Saunders, S. 1996“Relativism”Clifton, R. eds. Perspectives on Quantum RealityKluwer Academic PublishersDordrecht125142Google Scholar
- 16.D. Gottesman, ‘The Heisenberg representation of quantum computers”, July (1998), arXiv:quant-ph/9807006.Google Scholar
- 17.R. Jozsa, Personal communication, January (2001).Google Scholar
- 18.Timpson, C. G., Brown, H. R. 2002“Entanglement and relativity”Lupacchini, R.Fano, V. eds. Understanding Physical KnowledgeUniversity of Bologna, CLUEBBologna147166arXiv:quant-ph/0212140Google Scholar
- 20.L. Vaidman, “On the paradoxical aspects of new quantum experiments”, in D. Hull, M. Forbes, and R. M. Burian, ed., PSA 1994, vol. 1. (Philosophy of Science Association, 1994) pp. 211–217.Google Scholar
- 21.Maudlin, T. 1998“Part and whole in quantum mechanics”Castellani, E. eds. Interpreting BodiesPrinceton University PressPrinceton, New Jersey4660Google Scholar
- 23.D. Collins and S. Popescu, “Classical analog of entanglement”, Phys Rev A 65(3), 032321 (2002), arXiv:quant-ph/0107082.Google Scholar
- 24.P.F. Strawson, “Truth,” Proc. Aristot. Soc. Suppl. 24, 129--56 (1950); repr. in S. Blackburn and K. Simmons, eds., Truth (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999)Google Scholar