Skip to main content
Log in

Schedule optimization under fuzzy constraints of vehicle capacity

  • Published:
Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of designing timetables for public transportation is twofold: to ensure an efficient use of limited resources and to provide a comfortable ride for passengers. Two models for timetable optimization are investigated in this study. Model 1 uses a crisp constraint on the rate of vehicle capacity usage. Model 2 improves on model 1 by translating the crisp constraint into a fuzzy goal representing passenger satisfaction, and a fuzzy constraint, representing the extent of vehicle usage. Both, the fuzzy goal and the fuzzy constraint, are fuzzy sets on the number of on-board passengers. Heuristic methods together with linear programming are proposed for finding the optimal headway. Model 1 selects the largest time interval under the bound on vehicle size. The set of optimal time intervals in model 2 is decided by the simultaneous level cuts of the fuzzy goal and constraint. Experimental results show that fuzzy-set based model 2 is the most flexible and effective way to generate an optimal timetable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In China, \(\mathcal {B}\) is defined very precisely as the number of seats plus the effective standing area on the bus(sq.m.) times 8 (this assumes that up to 8 people can stand on a square-meter surface).

References

  • Bellman, R. E., & Zadeh, L. A. (1970). Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science, 17(4), B-141.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Castelli, L., Pesenti, R., & Ukovich, W. (2004). Scheduling multimodal transportation systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 155(3), 603–615.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ceder, A. (1984). Bus frequency determination using passenger count data. Transportation Research Part A: General, 18(5–6), 439–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceder, A. A., Hassold, S., & Dano, B. (2013). Approaching even-load and even-headway transit timetables using different bus sizes. Public Transport, 5(3), 193–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaari, T., Chaabane, S., Aissani, N., & Trentesaux, D. (2014). Scheduling under uncertainty: Survey and research directions. In 2014 International conference on advanced logistics and transport (ICALT) (pp. 229–234). IEEE

  • Chakraborty, D., Guha, D., & Dutta, B. (2016). Multi-objective optimization problem under fuzzy rule constraints using particle swarm optimization. Soft Computing, 20(6), 2245–2259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakroborty, P., Deb, K., & Subrahmanyam, P. (1995). Optimal scheduling of urban transit systems using genetic algorithms. Journal of transportation Engineering, 121(6), 544–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choon, O., & Tilahun, S. L. (2011). Integration fuzzy preference in genetic algorithm to solve multiobjective optimization problems. The Far East Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 55, 165–179.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Desaulniers, G., & Hickman, M. D. (2007). Chapter 2 public transit. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, 14, 69–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domschke, W. (1989). Schedule synchronization for public transit networks. OR Spectrum, 11(1), 17–24.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal, R. K., & Kaushal, S. (2018). Deriving crisp and consistent priorities for fuzzy AHP-based multicriteria systems using non-linear constrained optimization. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 17(2), 195–209.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Guihaire, V., & Hao, J. K. (2008). Transit network design and scheduling: A global review. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(10), 1251–1273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassold, S., & Ceder, A. (2012). Multiobjective approach to creating bus timetables with multiple vehicle types. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2276, 56–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra-Rojas, O., Delgado, F., Giesen, R., & Muñoz, J. (2015a). Planning, operation, and control of bus transport systems: A literature review. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 77, 38–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra-Rojas, O. J., López-Irarragorri, F., & Rios-Solis, Y. A. (2015b). Multiperiod bus timetabling. Transportation Science, 50(3), 805–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaymak, U., & Sousa, J. (2003). Weighted constraint aggregation in fuzzy optimization. Constraints, 8(1), 61–78.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ramík, J., & Vlach, M. (2016). Intuitionistic fuzzy linear programming and duality: A level sets approach. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 15(4), 457–489.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Salicru, M., Fleurent, C., & Armengol, J. (2011). Timetable-based operation in urban transport: Run-time optimisation and improvements in the operating process. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(8), 721–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, D. J., Xu, Y., & Peng, Z. R. (2015). Timetable optimization for single bus line based on hybrid vehicle size model. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 2(3), 179–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, L., Jin, J. G., Lee, D. H., Axhausen, K. W., & Erath, A. (2014a). Demand-driven timetable design for metro services. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 46, 284–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, L., Tirachini, A., Axhausen, K. W., Erath, A., & Lee, D. H. (2014b). Models of bus boarding and alighting dynamics. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 69, 447–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, J., Wang, D., Fung, R. Y., & Yung, K. L. (2004). Understanding of fuzzy optimization: Theories and methods. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 17(1), 117–136.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tilahun, S. L., & Ong, H. C. (2012). Bus timetabling as a fuzzy multiobjective optimization problem using preference-based genetic algorithm. Promet-Traffic and Transportation, 24(3), 183–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, R. C., Yuen, T. W., Fung, K. W., & Leung, J. M. (2008). Optimizing timetable synchronization for rail mass transit. Transportation Science, 42(1), 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Yanan Zhang’s work for this study was supported by the China Scholarship Council (Grant No. 201506250051) while visiting the MLCI Laboratory led by Anca Ralescu, in the EECS Department, College of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Cincinnati.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anca Ralescu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Meng, Z., Zheng, Y. et al. Schedule optimization under fuzzy constraints of vehicle capacity. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 18, 131–150 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-018-9289-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-018-9289-0

Keywords

Navigation