Abstract
This essay shows that a sharp distinction between ethics and aesthetics is unfruitful for thinking about how to live well with technologies, and in particular for understanding and evaluating how we cope with human existential vulnerability, which is crucially mediated by the development and use of technologies such as electronic ICTs. It is argued that vulnerability coping is a matter of ethics and art: it requires developing a kind of art and techne in the sense that it always involves technologies and specific styles of experiencing and dealing with vulnerability, which depend on social and cultural context. It is suggested that we try to find better, perhaps less modern styles of coping with our vulnerability, recognize limits to our attempts to “design” our new forms, and explore what kinds of technologies we need for this project.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arendt, H. (1992). In R. Beiner (Ed.), Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Arendt, H. (2003). In J. Kohn (Ed.), Responsibility and judgment. New York: Schocken Books.
Aristotle. (2000). Nicomachean ethics (trans. R. Crisp). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bostrom, N. (2005). The fable of the dragon tyrant. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(5), 273–277.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2007). Imagination and principles: An essay on the role of imagination in moral reasoning. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2012). Growing moral relations: Critique of moral status ascription. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2013). Human being @ risk: Enhancement, technology, and the evaluation of vulnerability transformations. Dordrecht: Springer.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2015). Moral craftsmanship. In S. Moran, D. Cropley, & J. Kaufman (Eds.), The ethics of creativity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
de Mul, J. (2006). De domesticatie van het noodlot: De wedergeboorte van de tragedie uit de geest van de technologie. Kampen: Klement.
Feenberg, A. (2010). Between reason and experience: Essays in technology and modernity. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Fesmire, S. (2003). John Dewey and moral imagination. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Johnson, M. (1993). Moral imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Milliken, J. (2010). Aristotle’s aesthetic ethics. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 44(2), 319–339.
van de Poel, I. (2005). Engineering design ethics. In C. Mitcham (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science, technology, and ethics. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA.
Verbeek, P. P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical re flections on technology, agency, and design. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Verbeek, P. P. (2011). Moralizing technology: Understanding and designing the morality of things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The comments to this article is available at doi:10.1007/s10699-015-9437-8 and 10.1007/s10699-015-9438-7
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Coeckelbergh, M. The Art of Living with ICTs: The Ethics–Aesthetics of Vulnerability Coping and Its Implications for Understanding and Evaluating ICT Cultures. Found Sci 22, 339–348 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-015-9436-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-015-9436-9