Systems thinking provides insights into how ideas interact and change, and constructivism is an example of this type of systemic approach. In the 1970s constructivism emphasised the development of mathematical and scientific ideas in children. Recently constructivist ideas are applied much more generally. Here I use this approach to consider beliefs and their role in conflicts and the conditions needed for reconciliation. If we look at Reality in terms of how we construct it as a human cognitive process, we recognise two things. First, that we cannot go beyond our senses and thoughts to what exists independently of us, and second, if we construct what we know we have to take responsibility for this. This inevitably focuses our thinking on the relation we have with the physical and social world, we are a part of the universe rather than apart from it. This paper argues that accepting and understanding these limits of human knowing together with our interconnectedness provide opportunities to understand conflicting positions. To resolve conflict, people with opposing viewpoints have to be prepared to understand each other. That is a challenge because our own reality plays a vital role in our lives, for everything from personal survival to social support.
KeywordsConstructivism Beliefs Conflict Realities Certainty
- Allport, G. (1954/1979). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
- Bateson, G., & Bateson, M. C. (1987). Angels fear: An investigation into the nature and meaning of the sacred. London: Rider.Google Scholar
- British Medical Journal. (2010). doi: 10.1136/bmj.c696.
- Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 993–1028). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. (1960) The quest for certainty. New York: Capricorn. (Originally published 1929).Google Scholar
- Dodig-Crnkovic, G. (2014). Info-computational constructivism and cognition. Constructivist Foundations, 9(2), 223–231.Google Scholar
- Dooley, T. (2010). The construction of mathematical insight by pupils in whole-class conversation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Douven, I. (2011). Peirce on abduction. Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. Retrieved February 21, 2014, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/abduction/peirce.html.
- Drudy, S., Gash, H., Lynch, K., Lavin, P., Moles, R., Lane, C., et al. (1991). Integrating equal opportunities in the curriculum of teacher education 1988–1991: TENET programme dissemination phase. Irish Educational Studies, 10, 271–289.Google Scholar
- Evans, D. (2012). Risk intelligence: How to live with uncertainty. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Floridi, L. (2011). A defence of constructionism: Philosophy as conceptual engineering. Metaphilosophy, 42(3), 282–304. http://www.philosophyofinformation.net/Welcome.html.
- Guardian. (2013). Retrieved February 21, 2014, from http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/dec/31/northern-ireland-draft-proposals-published.
- Helm, T. (2014). Extremist religion is at the root of 21st-century wars, says Tony Blair. The Guardian, 25(1), 14.Google Scholar
- Hetherington, E. M., Parke, R. D., & Locke, V. O. (2003). Child psychology: A contemporary viewpoint. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
- Johnson, S. (Ed.). (2009). Neoconstructivism: The new science of cognitive development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Laurenson, J. (2014). French boycott gender theory at school. Retrieved February 16, 2014, from http://dw.de/p/1B0Tp.
- McCann, E. (2013). Irish Times 12.12.13. The lessons of peace learned in the North may not be that easy to export.Google Scholar
- Murphy, B. (2014). Dummett, M. (1925–2011). Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved February 11, 2014, from http://www.iep.utm.edu/dummett/.
- Nescolarde-Selva, J., & Usó-Doménech, J.-L. (2013a). Topological structures of complex belief systems. Complexity, 19(1), 46–62.Google Scholar
- Riegler, A. (2007). Is Glasersfeld’s constructivism a dangerous intellectual tendency? In R. Glanville & A. Riegler (Eds.), The importance of being Ernst (pp. 263–275). Echoraum: Vienna.Google Scholar
- Rowlands, S., & Carson, R. The contradictions in the constructivism discourse. http://people.exeter.ac.uk/PErnest/pome14/rowlands.pdf.
- Tobias, S., & Duffy, T. M. (Eds.). (2009). Constructivist instruction: Success or failure. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory. New York: G. Braziller.Google Scholar
- von Glasersfeld, E. (1974). Piaget and the radical constructivist epistemology. In C. D. Smock & E. von Glasersfeld (Eds.), Epistemology and education. Follow through publications (pp. 1–24). Athens.Google Scholar