Foundations of Science

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 129–145 | Cite as

The Death and the Resurrection of (Psy)critique: The Case of Neuroeducation

  • J. De VosEmail author


A rapidly emerging hegemonic neuro-culture and a booming neural subjectivity signal the entry point for an inquiry into the status of the signifier neuro as a universal passe-partout. The wager of this paper is that the various (mis)appropriations of the neurosciences in the media and in academia itself point to something essential, if not structural, in connection with both the discipline of the neurosciences and the current socio-cultural and ideological climate. Starting from the case of neuroeducation (the application of neuroscience within education), the genealogy of the neurological turn is linked to the history of psychology and its inextricable bond with processes of psychologisation. If the neurological turn risks not merely neglecting the dimension of critique, but also obviating its possibility, then revivifying a psy-critique (understanding the academified modern subject as grounded in the scientific point of view from nowhere) might be necessary in order to understand today’s neural subjectivity and its place within current biopolitics.


Ideology critique Psychologisation Neuroeducation Neurologisation 


  1. Althusser, L. (2006). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (notes towards an investigation). In S. Aradhana, G. Akhil (Eds.) The anthropology of the state: A reader (pp. 86–111).Google Scholar
  2. Álvarez, M. P. (2011). The magnetism of neuroimaging: Fashion, myth and ideology of the brain. Papeles del Psicólogo, 32(2), 98–112.Google Scholar
  3. Baron-Cohen, S., Ring, H. A., Wheelwright, S., Bullmore, E. T., Brammer, M. J., Simmons, A., et al. (2008). Social intelligence in the normal and autistic brain: An fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 11(6), 1891–1898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett, M. R., & Hacker, P. M. S. (2003). Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Blakemore, S. J. (2008). The social brain in adolescence. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(4), 267–277.Google Scholar
  6. Blakemore, S. J., den Ouden, H., Choudhury, S., & Frith, C. (2007). Adolescent development of the neural circuitry for thinking about intentions. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2(2),130–139.Google Scholar
  7. Brenninkmeijer, J. (2010). Taking care of one’s brain: How manipulating the brain changes people’s selves. History of the Human Sciences, 23(1), 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burnett, S., & Blakemore, S. J. (2009). Functional connectivity during a social emotion task in adolescents and in adults. European Journal of Neuroscience, 29(6), 1294–1301.Google Scholar
  9. Burnett, S., Bird, G., Moll, J., Frith, C., & Blakemore, S. J. (2009). Development during adolescence of the neural processing of social emotion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(9), 1736–1750.Google Scholar
  10. De Vos, J. (2012). Psychologisation in times of globalisation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness explained. Boston, MA: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  12. Dumontheil, I., & Blakemore, S. J. (2012). Social cognition and abstract thought in adolescence: The role of structural and functional development in rostral prefrontal cortex. BJEP monograph series II, number 8-educational. Neuroscience, 1(1), 99–113.Google Scholar
  13. Foucault, M. (1984). What is enlightenment? In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 32–50). New York: Pantheon books.Google Scholar
  14. Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2007). Social cognition in humans. Current Biology, 17(16), R724–R732.Google Scholar
  15. Hanks, R. (2010). Common SENse for the inclusive classroom: How teachers can maximise existing skills to support special education needs. London: Jessica Kingsley Pub.Google Scholar
  16. Holt, R. (2012). US election: Politicians should think like scientists. Nature, 489(7417), 493–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hruby, G. G. (2012). Three requirements for justifying an educational neuroscience. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy (D. Carr, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Iacoboni, M. (2007). Neuroscience will change society.
  20. Johnson, M. H. (2011). Interactive specialization: a domain-general framework for human functional brain development?. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(1), 7–21.Google Scholar
  21. Johnston, A. (2008). Alain badiou, the hebb-event, and materialism split from within. Angelaki: Journal of Theoretical Humanities, 13(1), 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnston, A. (2011a). Materialism, subjectivity and the outcome of French philosophy: Interview with Adrian Johnston by Michael Burns and Brian Smith. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 7(1), 167–181.Google Scholar
  23. Johnston, A. (2011b). The weakness of nature: Hegel, Freud, Lacan, and negativity materialized.
  24. Lacan, J. (1966). La science et la vérité Ecrits (pp. 855–877). Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  25. Lacan, J. (1978). The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  26. Lacan, J. (2006). The seminar of Jacques Lacan: Book XVII: The other side of psychoanalysis (R. Grigg, Trans.). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  27. Leudar, I., & Costall, A. (2009). Introduction. In I. Leudar & A. Costall (Eds.), Against theory of mind (pp. 1–18). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Metzinger, T. (2003). Being no one: The self-model theory of subjectivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Moriguchi, Y., Ohnishi, T., Mori, T., Matsuda, H., & Komaki, G. (2007). Changes of brain activity in the neural substrates for theory of mind during childhood and adolescence. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 61(4), 355–363.Google Scholar
  30. Narvaez, D. (2012). Moral neuroeducation from early life through the lifespan. Neuroethics, 5(2), 145–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. (2002). OECD. Understanding the brain: Towards a new learning science. OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. Ortega, F., & Vidal, F. (2007). Mapping the cerebral subject in contemporary culture. Reciis, Electronic Journal of Communication Information & Innovation in Health, 1(2), 255–259.Google Scholar
  33. Parker, I. (1999). Critical psychology: Critical links. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 1(1), 3–18.Google Scholar
  34. Parker, I. (2007). Revolution in psychology: Alienation to emancipation. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  35. Patten, K. E., & Campbell, S. R. (2011). Introduction: Educational neuroscience. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pfeifer, J. H., Lieberman, M., & Dapretto, M. (2007). “I know you are but what am I?!”: neural bases of self-and social knowledge retrieval in children and adults. Cognitive Neuroscience, Journal of, 19(8), 1323–1337.Google Scholar
  37. Pfeifer, J. H., Masten, C. L., Borofsky, L. A., Dapretto, M., Fuligni, A. J., & Lieberman, M. D. (2009). Neural correlates of direct and reflected self-appraisals in adolescents and adults: When social perspective-taking informs self-perception. Child development, 80(4), 1016–1038.Google Scholar
  38. Pinker, S. (2008). The moral instinct. The New York Times Magazine, January, 13, pp. 32–37.Google Scholar
  39. Roberts, C. A. (2006). The ADHD parenting handbook: Practical advice for parents from parents. Lanham: Taylor Trade Publishing.Google Scholar
  40. Rose, N. (1996). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rose, N. (2006). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Taylor, M. (2009). Left brain, right brain. Prospect (p. 46).Google Scholar
  43. Timimi, S., Gardner, N., & McCabe, B. (2010). The myth of autism: Medicalising men’s and boy’s social and emotional competence. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  44. Timimi, S., & Radcliffe, N. (2005). The rise and rise of ADHD. In C. Newnes & N. Radcliffe (Eds.), Making and breaking children’s lives. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books.Google Scholar
  45. Van Rompuy, H. (2012). Letter to Mr. Barack Obama.
  46. Vander Valk, F. (2012). Introduction. In F. Vander Valk (Ed.), Essays on neuroscience and political theory: Thinking the body politic (pp. 1–22). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Vidal, F. (2009). Brainhood, anthropological figure of modernity. History of the Human Sciences, 22(1), 5–36. doi: 10.1177/0952695108099133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vrecko, S. (2010). Neuroscience, power and culture: An introduction. History of the Human Sciences, 23(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang, A. T., Lee, S. S., Sigman, M., & Dapretto, M. (2006). Developmental changes in the neural basis of interpreting communicative intent. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1(2), 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Žižek, S. (1997). Multiculturalism, or, the cultural logic of multinational capitalism. New Left Review, 225, 28–51.Google Scholar
  51. Zou, L., Pu, H., Sun, Q., & Su, W. (2012). Analysis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and control participants in EEG using ICA and PCA. In J. Wang, G. Yen, M. Polycarpou (Eds.) Advances in neural networks—ISNN 2012 (vol. 7367, pp. 403–410), Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations