Foundations of Science

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 213–225 | Cite as

And Yet It Moves: The Observability of the Rotation of the Earth

  • Peter Kosso


A central point of controversy in the time of the Copernican Revolution was the motion, or not, of the earth. We now take it for granted that Copernicus and Galileo were right; the earth really does move. But to what extent is this conclusion based on observation? This paper explores the meaning and observability of the rotation of the earth and shows that the phenomenon was not observable at the time of Galileo, and it is not observable now.


Evidence Galileo Mach Observation Relativity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barbour J. (2001) The discovery of dynamics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Galileo, G. (1953, originally published in 1632). Dialogue concerning the two chief world systems, translated by Stillman Drake. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. Lloyd G. E. R. (1970) Early greek science: Thales to Aristotle. W.W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Reichenbach, H. (1958). The philosophy of space and time. New York: Dover. Translated by Maria Reichenbach and John Freund.Google Scholar
  5. Rosenberg B., VanCamp L., Krigas T. (1965) Inhibation of cell division in Escherichia coli by electrolysis products from a platinum electrode. Nature 205: 698–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Stahl W. (1970) Aristarchus of Samos. In: Gillispie C. (eds) Dictionary of scientific biography (1st ed.). Scribner, New York, pp 246–250Google Scholar
  7. Toomer G. J. (1970) Heraclides Ponticus. In: Gillispie C. (eds) Dictionary of scientific biography (25th ed.). Scribner, New York, pp 202–205Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffUSA

Personalised recommendations