Foundations of Science

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 345–356 | Cite as

The Self-Organization of Time and Causality: Steps Towards Understanding the Ultimate Origin



Possibly the most fundamental scientific problem is the origin of time and causality. The inherent difficulty is that all scientific theories of origins and evolution consider the existence of time and causality as given. We tackle this problem by starting from the concept of self-organization, which is seen as the spontaneous emergence of order out of primordial chaos. Self-organization can be explained by the selective retention of invariant or consistent variations, implying a breaking of the initial symmetry exhibited by randomness. In the case of time, we start from a random graph connecting primitive “events”. Selection on the basis of consistency eliminates cyclic parts of the graph, so that transitive closure can transform it into a partial order relation of precedence. Causality is assumed to be carried by causal “agents” which undergo a more traditional variation and selection, giving rise to causal laws that are partly contingent, partly necessary.


Self-organization Cosmology Ontology Time Causality Order 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ashby, W. R. (1962). Principles of the self-organizing system. In H. Von Foerster, & G. W. Zopf Jr. (Eds.), Principles of self-organization pergamon (pp. 255–278).Google Scholar
  2. Barrow J. D., Tipler F. J. (1988) The anthropic cosmological principle. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Bastin T., Kilmister C. W. (1995) Combinatorial physics. World Scientific, River Edge, NJCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bastin T., Noyes H. P., Amson J., Kilmister C. W. (1979) On the physical interpretation and the mathematical structure of the combinatorial hierarchy. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 18(7): 445–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butterfield, J., Isham, C. J. & Kensington, S. (1999). On the emergence of time in quantum gravity. Arxiv preprint gr-qc/9901024.Google Scholar
  6. Cahill, R. T. (2003). Process physics. Process Studies Supplement (pp. 1–131).Google Scholar
  7. Cahill R. T. (2005) Process physics: From information theory to quantum space and matter. Nova Science Pub, NYGoogle Scholar
  8. Cahill, R. T., Klinger, C. M. & Kitto, K. (2000). Process physics: Modelling reality as self-organising information. Arxiv preprint gr-qc/0009023.Google Scholar
  9. Carr B. J., Rees M. J. (1979) The anthropic principle and the structure of the physical world. Nature 278(605): 230Google Scholar
  10. Deltete R. J., Guy R. A. (1996) Emerging from imaginary time. Synthese 108(2): 185–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eakins, J., & Jaroszkiewicz, G. (2003). The origin of causal set structure in the quantum universe.
  12. Feynman R. P. (1949) The theory of positrons. Physical Review 76: 749–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Freeland S. J., Hurst L. D. (1998) The genetic code is one in a million. Journal of Molecular Evolution 47(3): 238–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gershenson, C., & Heylighen, F. (2004). How can we think the complex? In K. Richardson (Ed.), Managing the complex Vol. 1: Philosophy, theory and application. Institute for the Study of Coherence and Emergence/Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Hanca J., Tulejab S., Hancovac M. (2004) Symmetries and conservation laws: Consequences of Noether’s theorem. American Journal of Physics 72(4): 428–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hawking S. (1988) A brief history of time. Bantam, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  17. Heylighen F. (1989) Causality as distinction conservation. A theory of predictability, reversibility, and time order. Cybernetics and Systems 20(5): 361–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heylighen F. (1990a) A structural language for the foundations of physics. International Journal of General Systems 18: 93–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heylighen F. (1990b) Representation and change. Communication & Cognition, GhentGoogle Scholar
  20. Heylighen, F. (2001) The science of self-organization and adaptivity. In L. D. Kiel (Ed.), Knowledge management, organizational intelligence and learning, and complexity (The Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS)). Oxford: Eolss Publishers (
  21. Heylighen F. (1999) Advantages and limitations of formal expression. Foundations of Science 4(1): 25–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kauffman S. A. (1995) At home in the universe: The search for laws of self-organization and complexity. Oxford University Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  23. Kronheimer E. H., Penrose R. (1967) On the structure of causal spaces. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 63: 481–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nicolis G., Prigogine I. (1977) Self-organization in nonequilibrium systems: From dissipative structures to order through fluctuations. Wiley Toronto,Google Scholar
  25. Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of Chaos. New York.Google Scholar
  26. Sjödin T., Heylighen F. (1985) Tachyons imply the existence of a privileged frame. Lettere al Nuovo Cimento 44: 617–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smolin L. (1997) The life of the cosmos. Oxford University Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  28. Stadler M., Kruse P. (1990) Theory of gestalt and self-organization. In: Heylighen F., Rosseel E., Demeyere F. (eds) Self-steering and cognition in complex systems. Gordon and Breach, New York, pp 142–169Google Scholar
  29. Turchin V. F. (1993) The cybernetic ontology of action. Kybernetes 22: 10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. von Foerster H. (1960) On self-organizing systems and their environments. In: Yovits M. C., Cameron S. (eds) Self-organizing systems. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 31–50Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Evolution, Complexity and Cognition GroupVrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations