Improved responsiveness of reconfigurable manufacturing systems using a standards-based approach to assess manufacturing capacity



Market acceptance of the S95 enterprise-control system integration standard and its adoption in IEC 62264, combined with the use of the ISO 15745 application integration scheme, offers a common framework for integrating diagnostic and control activities with asset maintenance and management activities. This paper describes a standard-based approach to improve the responsiveness of reconfigurable systems by using condition-based maintenance and diagnostics information to assess manufacturing capacity. Use of integration models and interoperability schemas enable manufacturing management to have greater visibility into the current state and the capabilities of manufacturing assets to meet scheduled manufacturing requirements.


ISO 15745 ISO 13374 IEC 62264 MIMOSA OPC Integration Framework 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    ISO, Geneva, Switzerland (2003) ISO 15745-1, Industrial automation systems and integration—open systems application integration framework—Part 1: generic reference descriptionGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    OMG, Needham, Massachusetts, USA (2004) UML V2.0, unified modeling language specification, versionGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    W3C, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA (2000) Rec-XML-20001006, extensible mark-up language, 2nd ednGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    ISA, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA (2005) ANSI/ISA S95.00.03, Enterprise-control system integration—Part 3: activity models for manufacturing operations managementGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    IEC, Geneva, Switzerland (2003) IEC 62264-1, Enterprise-control system integration—Part 1: overview and model terminologyGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    IEC, Geneva, Switzerland (2004) IEC 62264-2, Enterprise-control system integration—Part 2: data objects and attributesGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    ISA, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA (2001) ANSI/ISA S95.00.02, Enterprise-control system integration—Part 2: object model attributesGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    ISA, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA (2000) ANSI/ISA S95.00.01, Enterprise-control system integration—Part 1: models and terminologyGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    SEMI, San Jose, California, USA Standard, E139, Specification for recipe and parameter management (RaP)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    SEMI, San Jose, California, USA, Standard, E133, Provisional specification for automated process control systems interfaceGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    SEMI, San Jose, California, USA, Standard, E121, Guide for style & usage of XML for semiconductor manufacturing applicationsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Carnahan
    • 1
  • D. Chung
    • 1
  • E. delaHostria
    • 1
  • C. Hoover
    • 1
  1. 1.Rockwell Automation, Inc.Mayfield HeightsUSA

Personalised recommendations