Advertisement

Fish Physiology and Biochemistry

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 605–626 | Cite as

Effects of ultraviolet A on the activity of two metabolic enzymes, DNA damage and lipid peroxidation during early developmental stages of the African catfish, Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822)

  • Imam A. A. Mekkawy
  • Usama M. Mahmoud
  • Alaa G. Osman
  • Alaa El-Din H. Sayed
Article

Abstract

Many ultraviolet-A (UVA)-induced biochemical and physiological changes are valid as biomarkers using aquatic species for detection of the degree of stress. Changes in the concentration and activities of enzymes, such as glucose-6-phosphate dehyderogenase (G6PDH), lactate dehyderogenase (LDH), DNA damage and lipid peroxidation (LPO), can be used as biomarkers to identify possible environmental contamination in fish. This study aimed to investigate the impact of UVA on the activity of the selected enzymes, DNA damage and LPO during early developmental stages of the African catfish Clarias gariepinus. Embryo hemogenates were used for measurements of G6PDH, LDH, DNA damage and LPO concentrations and activities spectrophotometrically at 37°C. The normal ontogenetic variations in enzyme activities, DNA damage and LPO of the early developmental stages (24–168 h-PFS; hours-post fertilization stage) were studied. There was a significant decrease in the activity of G6PDH till 120 h-PFS. Then after 120 h-PFS, the activity of such enzymes insignificantly increased toward higher stages. The LDH activity was recorded with a pattern of decrease till 96 h-PFS, followed by a significant increase toward 168 h-PFS. The polynomial pattern of variations in DNA damage and LPO was also evident. The patterns of the enzyme activities, corresponding DNA damage and LPO of the early ontogenetic stages under the influence of three different UVA doses (15, 30 and 60 min), were recorded. The pattern of variations in G6PDH activity in UVA-induced groups was similar to that of the control group with variation in the magnitude of such activity. In all treated groups, LDH activity decreased till 96 h-PFS, then increased till 168 h-PFS. Within each of the embryonic stages, the increase in UVA led to a significant increase in DNA damage. A significant increase in lipid peroxidation under UVA doses was recorded. The variability in number and molecular weight of proteins under exposure to UVA was evident, reflecting some of the genetic and transcriptional changes during exposure and development.

Keywords

UVA G6PDH LDH DNA damage LPO African catfish 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. Alapetite C, Wachter T, Sage E, Moustacchi E (1996) Use of alkaline comet assay to detect DNA repair deficiencies in human fibroblasts exposed to UVC, UVB, UVA and gamma-rays. Int J Radiat Biol 69:359–369. doi: 10.1080/095530096145922 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almeida JA, Novelli ELB, Silva MD, Alves R (2001) Environmental cadmium exposure and metabolic responses of the Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Environ Pollut 114:169–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrew TEH, Jacob GS (2003) Epithelial activity of hexokinase and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase in cultured bovine lenses recovering from pharmaceutical-induced optical damage. Mol Vis 9:594–600Google Scholar
  4. Ankley GT, Collyard SA, Monson PD, Kosian PA (1994) Influence of ultraviolet light on the toxicity of sediment contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Environ Conta Toxicol 13:1791–1796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Annie M, Marquis I, Gaboriau F, Santus R, Dubertret L, Morlière P (1993) Ultraviolet A-induced lipid peroxidation and antioxidant defense systems in cultured human skin fibroblasts. J Invest Dermatol 100:692–698. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12472352 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Armeni T, Damiani E, Battino M, Greci L, Principato G (2004) Lack of in vitro protection by a common sunscreen ingredient on UVA-induced cytotoxicity in keratinocytes. Toxic 203:165–178. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2004.06.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Armstrong TN, Reimschuessel R, Bradly BP (2002) DNA damage, histological changes and DNA repair in larval Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) exposed to ultraviolet-B radiation. Aquat Toxicol 58:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berges JA, Ballantyne JS (1991) Size scaling of whole body maximal enzyme activities in aquatic crustaceans. Can J Fish Aquac Sci 48:2385–2394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brian LD (2002) Sources and measurements of ultraviolet radiation. Methods 28(1):4–13. doi: 10.1016/S1046-2023(02)00204-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Browman HI, Vetter RD, Flodriguez CA, Cullen JJ, Davis RF, Lynn E, Pierre J (2003) Ultraviolet (280–400 nm)-induced DNA damage in the eggs and larvae of Calanus finmarchicus G. (Copepoda) and atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). Photochem Photobiol 77(4):397–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buege JA, Aust SD (1978) Microsomal lipid peroxidation. Methods Enzymol 52:302–310. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(78)52032-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Castro-Pérez CA (2004) Effects of ultraviolet radiation exposure on the swimming performance and hematological parameters of tambaqui, colossoma macropomum. International Congress on the Biology of Fish, Tropical Hotel Resort, Manaus Brazil, August: 1–5Google Scholar
  13. Ciereszko A, Tobie DW, Konrad D (2005) Analysis of DNA damage in sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) spermatozoa by UV, hydrogen peroxide, and the toxic antbisazir. Aquat Toxicol 73(2):128–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clarke ME, Calvi C, Domeier M, Edmonds M, Walsh PJ (1992) Effects of nutrition and temperature on metabolic enzyme activities in larval and juvenile red drum, Sciaenops ocellatus and lane snapper, Lutjanus synagris. Marine Biol 112:31–36Google Scholar
  15. Clydesdale GJ, Dandie GW, Muller HK (2001) Ultraviolet light induced injury: Immunological and inflammatory effects. Immunol Cell Biol 79(6):547–568. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1711.2001.01047.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coquelle N, Fioravanti E, Weik M, Vellieux F, Madern D (2007) Activity, stability and structural studies of lactate dehydrogenases adapted to extreme thermal environments. J Mol Biol 374:547–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Graaf GJ, Janssen H (1996) Artificial reproduction and pond rearing of the African catfish Clarias gariepinus in sub-Saharan Africa. FAO, Fish Tech Pap 362:1–73Google Scholar
  18. Degroot SJ (1987) Culture of Clarias species. Aquaculture 63:1–36. doi: 10.1016/0044-8486(87)90056-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dong Q, Svoboda K, Tiersch TR, Monroe WT (2007) Photobiological effects of UVA and UVB light in zebrafish embryos: evidence for a competent photorepair system. J Photochem Photob B Biol 88:137–146. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2007.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Douki T, Reynaud-Angelin A, Cadet J, Sage E (2003) Bipyrimidine photoproducts rather than oxidative lesions are the main type of DNA damage involved in the genotoxic effect of solar UVA radiation. Biochem 42:9221–9226. doi: 10.1021/bi034593c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dovrat A, Weinreb O (1995) Recovery of lens optics and epithelial enzymes after ultraviolet A radiation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36:12Google Scholar
  22. Elumalai M, Antunes C, Guilhermino L (2002) Effects of single metals and their mixtures on selected enzymes of Carcinus maenas. Water Air Soil Pollut 141:273–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Estey T, Cantore M, Weston PA, Carpenter JF, Petrash JM, Vasiliou V (2007) Mechanisms involved in the protection of UV-induced protein inactivation by the corneal crystallin ALDH3A1. J Biol Chem 282(7):4382–4392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fu Y, Jin X, Wei S, Lin H, Kacew S (2000) Ultraviolet radiation and reactive oxygen generation as inducers of keratinocyte apoptosis: protective role of tea polyphenols. J Toxicol Environ Health 61(3):177–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gaboriau F, Morliére P, Marquis I, Moysan A, Géze M, Dubertret L (1993) Membrane damage induced in cultured human skin fibroblasts by UVA irradiation. Photochem Photobiol 58:515–520. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1993.tb04924.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gallagher RP, Lee TK (2006) Adverse effects of ultraviolet radiation: a brief review. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 92:119–131. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2006.02.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gantchev TG, van Lier JE (1995) Catalase inactivation following photosensitization with tetrasulfonated metallophtalocyanines. Photochem Photobiol 62:123–134. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1995.tb05248.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gornall AC, Bardawill CJ, David MM (1949) Determination of serum proteins by means of the Biuret reaction. J Biol Chem 177:751–766PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Häkkinen J, Oikari A (2004) A field methodology to study effects of UV radiation on fish larvae. Water Res 38:2891–2897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jarvis RB, Knowles JF (2003) DNA damage in zebrafish larvae induced by exposure to low-dose rate gamma-radiation: detection by the alkaline comet assay. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 541:63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jochen G, Lidia L, Hubert T, Ute R, Claus U (1996) Isolation, sequencing and overproduction of the single-stranded DNA binding protein from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO. Gene 182:137–143. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(96)00535-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kachmar JF, Moss DW ( 1976) In: Tietz NW (ed) Fundamentals of clinical chemistry, 2nd edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, p 652Google Scholar
  33. Kevin RA (1994) Impact of ozone depletion on phytoplankton growth in the Southern Ocean: large-scale spatial and temporal variability. Mar Ecolo Prog 114:1–12. doi: 10.3354/meps114001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kielbassa C, Len R, Bernd E (1997) Wavelength dependence of oxidative DNA damage induced by UV and visible light. Carcinogenesis 18:811–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kino K, Sugiyama H (2005) UVR-induced G–C to C–G transversions from oxidative DNA damage. Mutat Res 571:33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kligman LH, Akin FJ, Kligman AM (1983) Sunscreens promote repair of ultraviolet radiation-induced dermal damage. J Investig Dermatol 81:98–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kornberg A (1955) Lactic dehydrogenase of muscle. In: Lowestein JM (ed) Methods in enzymology. Academic Press, New York, pp 441–442Google Scholar
  38. Kurita-Ochiai T, Fukushima K, Ochiai K (1999) Lipopolysaccharide stimulates butyric acid-induced apoptosis in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Infect Immun 67:22–29PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during assembly of head of bacteriophage-T4. Nature 227: 680–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lee SM, Koh H, Park D, Song BJ, Huh T, Park J (2002) Cytosolic NADP+-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase status modulates oxidative damage to cells. Free Radic Biol Med 32(11):1185–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Legrand C, Bour JM, Jacob C, Capiaumont J, Martial J, Marc A, Wudtke M, Kretzmer G, Demangel C, Duval D, Hache J (1992) Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity of the number of dead cells in the medium of cultured eukaryotic cells as marker. J Biotechnol 25:231–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lemos D, Salomon M, Gomes V, Phan V, Buchholz E (2003) Citrate synthase and pyruvate kinase activities during early life stages of the shrimp Farfantepenaeus paulensis (Crustacea, Decapoda, Penaeidae): effects of development and temperature. Comp Biochem Physiol B 135:707–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Little EE, Cleveland L, Hurtubise R, Barron MG (2000) Assessment of the photoenhanced toxicity of a weathered petroleum to the tidewater silverside. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:926–932. doi: 10.1897/1551-5028(2000)019<0926:AOTPTO>2.3.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Losey GS, Hydes D (1998) The UV visual world of fishes. J Fish Biol 54:921–945. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1999.tb00848.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mallakin A, McConkey BJ, Miao G, Mckibben B, Snieckus V, Dixon DG, Greenberg BM (1999) Impacts of structural photomodification on the toxicity of environmental contaminants: anthracene photooxidation products. Ecotoxic Envir saf 43:204–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McCloskey JT, Oris JT (1993) Effect of anthracene and solar ultraviolet radiation exposure on gill ATPase and selected hematologic measurements in the bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Aquat Toxicol 24:207–218. doi: 10.1016/0166-445X(93)90072-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McFadzen I, Baynes S, Hallam J, Beesley A, Lowe D (2000) Histopathology of the skin of UV-B irradiated sole (Solea solea) and turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) larvae. Marine Environ Res 50:273–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mekkawy IAA, Lashein FE (2003) The effect of lead and cadmium on LDH and G-6-PDH isozyme patterns exhibited during the early embryonic development of the teleost fish, Ctenopharyngodon idellus with emphasis on the corresponding morphological variations. The Big Fish Bang, the proceeding of the 26th Annual Larval Fish Conference (LFC2002), 22-26 July, 2002, Bergen, Norway, edited by: Howard I. Browman and Anne Berit SkiftesvikGoogle Scholar
  49. Merwald H, Klosner G, Kokesch C, Der-Petrossian M, Honigsmann H, Trautinger F (2005) UVA-induced oxidative damage and cytotoxicity depend on the mode of exposure. J Photochem Photob B Biol 79(3):197–207. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2005.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Morlière P, Annie M, René S, Gabriele H, Jean-Claude M, Louis D (1991) UVA-induced lipid peroxidation in cultured human fibroblasts. BBA Lipids Lipid Metab 1084(3):261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nathanailides C (1996) Metabolic specialization of muscle during development in cold water and warm water fish species exposed to different thermal conditions. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:2147–2155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nguyen LTH, Janssen CR (2002) Embryo-larval toxicity tests with the African catfish (Clarias gariepinus): comparative sensitivity of endpoints. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 42:256–262. doi: 10.1007/s00244-001-0007-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Obermüller B, Puntarrulo S, Abele D (2007) UV-tolerance and instantaneous physiological stress responses of two Antarctic amphipod species Gondogeneia antarctica and Djerboa furcipes during exposure to UV radiation. Mar Environ Res 64:267–285. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2007.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Osman AG, Mekkawy IAA, Verreth J, Kirschbaum F (2007a) Effects of lead nitrate on the activity of metabolic enzymes during early developmental stages of the African catfish, Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822). Fish Physiol Biochem 33:1–13. doi: 10.1007/s10695-006-9111-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Osman AG, Wuertz S, Mekkawy IAA, Exner H, Kirschbaum F (2007b) Lead induced malformations in embryos of the African catfish Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822). Environ Toxicol 22(4):375–389. doi: 10.1002/tox.20272 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Osman AG, Mekkawy IAA, Verreth J, Wuertz S, Kloas W, Kirschbaum F (2008) Monitoring of DNA breakage in embryonic stages of the African catfish Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) after exposure to lead nitrate using alkaline comet assay. Environ Toxicol 23:679–687. doi: 10.1002/tox.20373 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pandey S, Parvez S, Sayeed I, Haque R, Bin-Hafeez B, Raisuddin S (2003) Biomarkers of oxidative stress: a comparative study of river Yamuna fish Wallago attu (Bl. & Schn.). Sci Total Environ 309:105–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pelletier D, Blier PU, Dutil JD, Guderley H (1995) How should enzyme activities be used in fish growth studies? J Exp Biol 198:1493–1497PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Petersen AB, Gniadecki R, Vicanova J, Thorn T, Wulf HC (2000) Hydrogen peroxide is responsible for UVA-induced DNA damage measured by alkaline comet assay in HaCaT keratinocytes. J photo photob B Biology 59:123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Punnonen K, Puntala A, Ansen CT, Ahotupa M (1991) UVB irradiation induces lipid peroxidation and reduced antioxidant enzyme activities in human keratinocytes in vitro. Acta Dermato-venerologica 1:239–273Google Scholar
  61. Rosety-Rodriguez M, Ordonez F, Rosety I, Rosety J, Rosery M (2005) Erythrocyte antioxidant enzymes of gilthead as early-warning bio-indicators of oxidative stress induced by malathion. Haematology 8:237–240Google Scholar
  62. Rozema J, Van Geel B, Bjorn LO, Lean J, Madronich S (2002) Toward solving the UV puzzle. Science 296:1621–1622. doi: 10.1126/science.1070024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Salo H, Jokinen E, Markkula S, Aaltonen T, Penttilä H (2000) Comparative effects of UVA and UVB irradiation on the immune system of fish. J photo photob B. Biology 56:154–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sastry KV, Gupta PK (1980) Alterations in the activities of a few dehydrogenases in the digestive system of 2 teleost fishes exposed to lead nitrate. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 4:232–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Segner H, Verreth J (1995) Metabolic enzyme activities in larvae of the African catfish, Clarias gariepinus—changes in relation to age and nutrition. Fish Physiol Biochem 14:385–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Setlow RB, Woodhead AD (1994) Temporal changes in the incidence of malignant melanoma: explanation from action spectra. Mutat Res 307:365–374. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(94)90310-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Setlow RB, Gist E, Thompson K, woodhead Avril D (1993) Wavelengths effective in induction of malignant melanoma. Genetics 90:6666–6670Google Scholar
  68. Singh RK, Sharma B (1998) Carbofuran-induced biochemical changes in Clarias batrachus. Pest Sci 53:285–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Singh SS, Pankaj k, Ashwani k (2006) Ultraviolet radiation stress: molecular and physiological adaptations in trees in A biotic stress tolerance in plants Springer etherlands editer. doi: 10.1007/14020-4389
  70. Sinha RP, Häder D (2002) UV-induced DNA damage and repair: a review. Photochem Photobiol Sci 1:225–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Societe Francaise de Biologie Clinique (1982) Enzymology commission. Recommendations. Ann Biol Clin (Paris) 40:87–164Google Scholar
  72. Somero S, Childress J (1985) Scaling of oxidative and glycolytic enzyme activities in fish muscle. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  73. Stephensen E, Svavarsson J, Sturve J, Ericson G, Adolfsson-Erici M, Förlin L (2000) Biochemical indicators of pollution exposure in shorthorn sculpin (Myoxocephalus scorpius), caught in four harbours on the southwest coast of Iceland. Aquat Toxicol 48:431–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Thomas E, Ursula F, Rainhardt O (2001) DNA damage and apoptosis in mononuclear cells from glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase-deficient patients (G6PD Aachen variant) after UV irradiation. J Leukoc Biol 69:340–342Google Scholar
  75. Tsubai T, Matsuo M (2002) Ultraviolet light-induced changes in the glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity of porcine corneas. Cornea 21(5):495–500. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200207000-00011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Utley HC, Bernheim F, Hachslien P (1967) Effects of sulfhydryl reagent on peroxidation in microsome. Arch Biochem Biophys 260:521–531Google Scholar
  77. Volckaert FAM, Hellemans BA, Galbusera P, Ollevier F, Sekkali B, Belayew A (1994) Replication, expression and fate of foreign DNA during embryonic and larval development of the African catfish Clarias gariepinus. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 3:57–69PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Weatherhead EC, Stevermer A (2001) Ultraviolet radiation. In: Encyclopedia of global environmental change, vol 1. John Wiley and Sons IncGoogle Scholar
  79. Weatherhead EC, George CT, Gregory CR, John EF, John JD, Dongseok C (1997) Analysis of long-term behavior of ultraviolet radiation measured by Robertson-Berger meters at 14 sites in the United States. J Geophys Res 102(d7):8737–8754. doi: 10.1029/96JD03590 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Weatherhead SC, Haniffa M, Lawrence CM (2007) Melanomas arising from naevi and de novo melanomas does origin matter? Briti J derma 156:72–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. WHO (2003) Climate change and human health—risks and responses—summary. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  82. Williamson CE (1995) What role does UV-B radiation play in freshwater ecosystems? Limno oceanog 40(2):386–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Williamson CE, Metgar SL, Lovera PA, Moeller RE (1997) Solar ultraviolet radiation and the spawning habitat of yellow Perch, Perca flavescens. Ecol Appl 7(3):1017–1023. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[1017:SURATS]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Winckler K, Fidhiany L (1996) Significant influence of UVA on the general metabolism in the growing Ciclid fish, Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum. J photochem photob B. Biology 33:131–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wu RSS, Lam PKS (1997) Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and lactate dehydrogenase in the green-lipped mussel (Perna viridis). Possible biomarker for hypoxia in the marine environment. Water Res 31:2797–2801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Yeh S, Wang W, Huang C, Hu M (2005) Pro-oxidative effect of β-carotene and the interaction with flavonoids on UVA-induced DNA strand breaks in mouse fibroblast C3H10T1/2 cells. J Nutr Biochem 16(12):729–735. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2005.03.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Imam A. A. Mekkawy
    • 1
  • Usama M. Mahmoud
    • 1
  • Alaa G. Osman
    • 2
  • Alaa El-Din H. Sayed
    • 1
  1. 1.Zoology Department, Faculty of ScienceAssiut UniversityAssiutEgypt
  2. 2.Zoology Department, Faculty of ScienceAl Azhar UniversityAssiutEgypt

Personalised recommendations