Skip to main content
Log in

Fire Resistance of Thermally Insulated Log-House Timber Walls

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the results of standard test results and Finite Element numerical modelling for a thermally insulated log-house timber wall loaded in compression and exposed to fire. A key aspect in the design of log-house systems, being susceptible to possible local failure mechanisms and buckling phenomena, is represented by geometrical details like the cross-section of logs (typically characterised by depth-to-width ratios in the order of two or more) and the corner joints features. This is also the case of log-house structures exposed to fire, were the premature collapse due to combined thermo-mechanical loads should be properly prevented. In this context, insulation claddings can markedly delay the fire propagation and temperature increase in the timber components, as to increase their overall fire resistance. Such an aspect is important especially for commercial buildings or accommodation facilities, according to international design requirements. To this aim, the paper reports on a full-scale, ≈ 3 m × 3 m and 90 mm thick, thermally insulated log-house wall specimen (‘W90-insulated’) loaded in compression (RN = 0.13 the ratio, as in a 2-storey building) and exposed to fire, in accordance to the EN/ISO temperature–time standard curve. The most important test results are commented, including comparisons towards an unprotected wall with identical nominal geometry (‘W90′), which was previously tested in the same facility. It is shown, in particular, that the insulation package can extend the fire resistance of the wall up to more than 150 min (with limited charring and deformations of logs), that is three times the unprotected sample. The furnace experiment herein presented, even in presence of intrinsic limitations for the testing method, emphasises the need of a wide set of instruments to properly capture the key temperature and deformation results of log-house assemblies, as well as the lack in design standards of specific performance parameters. The W90-insulated test predictions are hence explored in the paper via FE numerical models, where major advantages for the timber components are derived from past literature efforts and special care is spent for the thermal insulation package. Even in presence of well known simplifications (i.e., thermo-mechanical boundaries/loads and thermo-physical properties of materials), as shown, the FE method can offer interesting correlation with the full-scale predictions, for more than 100 min of exposure. In addition, the crucial role of cladding layers on the fire resistance and failure time/mechanism of log-house walls is further assessed, based on FE parametric studies of technical interest, inclusive of different configurations for the thermal insulation layers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. EN 1363-1 (2012) Fire resistance tests—part 1: general requirements. CEN (European Committee for Standardization), Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  2. Östman B et al. (2010) Fire safety in timber buildings. Technical Guideline for Europe, SP Report 19

  3. Suzuki J, Mizukami T, Naruse T, Araki Y (2016) Fire resistance of timber panel structures under standard fire exposure. Fire Technol 52(4): 1015–1034, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-016-0578-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mindeguia JC, Cueff G, Dréan G, Auguin G (2018) Simulation of charring depth of timber structures when exposed to non-standard fire iso-curves, J Struct Fire Eng 9(1): 63–76, https://doi.org/10.1108/JSFE-01-2017-0011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schmid J, Santomaso A, Brandon D, Wickstrom U, Frangi A (2017). Timber under real fire conditions—the influence of oxygen content and gas velocity on the charring behavior, J Struct Fire Eng 10.1108/JSFE-01-2017-0013 (article in press)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schnabl S, Turk G, Planinc I (2011) Buckling of timber columns exposed to fire. Fire Saf J 46: 431–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lineham SA, Thomson D, Bartlett AI, Bisby LA, Hadden RM (2016) Structural response of fire-exposed cross-laminated timber beams under sustained loads. Fire Saf J 85: 23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schmid J, Klippel M, Just A, Frangi A (2014) Review and analysis of fire resistance tests of timber members in bending, tension and compression with respect to the reduced cross-section method. Fire Saf J 68: 81–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Franzoni L, Dhima D, Lyon F, Laebée A, Foret G (2017) A stiffness-based approach to analyze the fire behaviour of cross-laminated timber floors. Struct Eng Int 27(2): 238–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ekr J, Caldova E, Vymlatil P, Wald Frantisek, Kuklikova A (2018) Timber steel-fibre-reinforced concrete floor slabs subjected to fire. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 76(1): 201–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Frangi A, Knobloch M, Fontana M (2010). Fire design of timber-concrete composite slabs with screwed connections. J Struct Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000101

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yue K, Chen Z, Lu W, Liu W, Li M, Shao Y, Tang L, Wan L (2017) Evaluating the mechanical and fire-resistance properties of modified fast-growing Chinese fir timber with boric-phenol-formaldehyde resin. Constr Build Mater 154: 956–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tiso M, Just A (2017) Design criteria for insulation materials applied in timber frame assemblies. J Struct Fire Eng. http://doi.org/10.1108/JSFE-01-2017-0015

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pásztory Z, Mohácsiné IR, Börcsök Z (2017) Investigation of thermal insulation panels made of black locust tree bark. Constr Build Mater 147: 733–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang J, Xu Q, Xu Y, Wang B, Shang J (2012) A numerical study on the fire endurance of wood beams exposed to three-side fire. Appl Phys Eng 13(7): 491–505

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thi VD, Khelifa M, Oudjene M, El Ganaoui M, Rogaume Y (2017) Finite element analysis of heat transfer through timber elements exposed to fire. Eng Struct 143: 11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Du H, Hu X, Zhang B, Minli Y (2017) Numerical simulation on behaviour of timber-concrete composite beams in fire. IOP Conf. Ser Earth Environ Sci 81: 012148, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/81/1/012148

  18. Zhang J, Wang Y, Li L, Xu Q (2017) Thermo-mechanical behaviour of dovetail timber joints under fire exposure. Fire Saf J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.11.008 (article in press)

    Google Scholar 

  19. [19]Menis A, Fragiacomo M, Clemente I (2012). Numerical investigation of the fire resistance of protected cross-laminated timber floor panels. Struct Eng Int 22(4): 523–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Visscher H, Meijer F, Sheridan L (2008) Fire safety regulations for housing in Europe compared. Build Res J 56(4): 215–227

    Google Scholar 

  21. VVF (2016) Le strutture turistico-alberghiere: studio comparato della normativa europea e indagine statistica sugli incendi avvenuti in Italia, Direzione Centrale per la Prevenzione e la Sicurezza Tecnica, Technical Report (in Italian), available online (accessed on October 2018): http://5.89.39.241/cciaa/layout/document_view.php?ID=6265

  22. Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government (2017). Independent review on building regulations and fire safety. www.abi.org.uk

  23. Vassart O, Zhao B, Cajot LG, RObert F, Meyer A, Frangi A (2014) Eurocodes: background and applications structural fire design. JRC90239, EUR 26698 EN, ISBN 978-92-79-38671-8, https://doi.org/10.2788/85432

  24. BFS 2015:6—EKS 10. Boverket mandatory provisions amending the boards’s mandatory provisions and general recommendations (2011:10) on the application of European design standards (Eurocodes), EKS (www.boverket.se)

  25. EN 1995-1-1 (2004). Eurocode 5—Design of timber structures. Part 1-1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. CEN (European Committee for Standardization), Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  26. EN 1998-1 (2004) Eurocode 8—design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. CEN (European Committee for Standardisation), Brussels, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  27. EN 1995-1-2 (2004) Eurocode 5—design of timber structures. Part 1-2: general—structural fire design. CEN (European Committee for Standardization), Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  28. Branco J, Araújo JP (2012) Structural behaviour of log timber walls under lateral in plane loads. Eng Struct 40: 371–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bedon C, Fragiacomo M, Amadio C, Sadoch C (2015). Experimental study and numerical investigation of Blockhaus shear walls subjected to in-plane seismic loads. J Struct Eng. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001065

    Google Scholar 

  30. Piazza M (2013) Seismic performance of multi-storey timber buildings—Rusticasa building—Final Report, SERIES 227887 Timber Buildings Project, free download at http://www.series.upatras.gr/dev

  31. Bedon C, Fragiacomo M (2018). Numerical investigation of timber log-haus walls with steel dovetail reinforcements under in-plane seismic loads. Adv Civil Eng Volume 2018, Article ID 6929856, https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ace/aip/6929856

  32. Bedon C, Fragiacomo M (2016) Derivation of buckling design curves via FE modelling for in-pane compressed timber log-walls in accordance with the Eurocode 5. Eur J Wood Wood Prod (published online), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-016-1083-5

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bedon C, Fragiacomo M (2018) Experimental and numerical analysis of in-plane compressed unprotected log-haus timber walls in fire conditions. Fire Saf J https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.12.007

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bedon C, Fragiacomo M (2018) Fire resistance of in-plane compressed log-house timber walls with partial thermal insulation, Buildings 8(10): 131, https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8100131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Schmid J, Lange D, Sjostrom J, Brandon D, Klippel M, Frangi A (2018) The use of furnace tests to describe real fires of timber structures. In: Proceedings of WCTE 2018—world conference on timber engineering, August 20–23, 2018, Seoul, Republic of Korea (CD Rom)

  36. Bisby L, Gales J, Maluk C (2013) A contemporary review of large-scale non-standard structural fire testing. Fire Sci Rev 2:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ariyanayagam AD, Mahendran M (2013) Fire safety of buildings based on realistic fire time-temperature curves. In Kajewski SL, Manley K, Hampson KD (Eds.)In: Proceedings of the 19th International CIB world building congress, Brisbane 2013: Construction and Society, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane Convention & Exhibition Centre, Brisbane, QLD, pp. 1–13

  38. Frangi A, Bochicchio G, Ceccotti A, Lauriola MP (2008). Natural full-scale fire test on a 3 storey xlam timber building. In: Proceedings of WCTE 2008—world conference on timber engineering, June 2–5, 2008, Miyazak, Japan (CD Rom)

  39. Schmid J, Santomaso A, Brandon D, Wickstrom U, Frangi A (2017) Timber under real fire conditions—The influence of oxygen concentration and gas velocity on the charring behaviour. J Struct Fire Eng. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSFE-01-2017-0013

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lange D, Bostrom L, Schmid J, Albrektsson J (2014) The influence of parametric fire scenarios on structural timber performance and reliability. SP Report 2014:35, SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, ISBN 978-91-87461-78-1, ISSN 0284-5172

  41. COST Action FP1404 (2018) Minutes of the workshop on “thermal exposure of combustible and incombustible structures in fire”, June 5, 2018, Belfast, Ireland (http://www.costfp1404.ethz.ch/Meetings/past-events.html)

  42. [43]Richardson LR (2001) Thoughts and observations on fire-endurance tests of wood-frame assemblies protected by gypsum board. Fire Mater 25: 223–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Frangi A, Palma P, Hugi E, Cachim P, Cruz H (2014) Fire resistance tests on beam-to-column shear connections. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on structures in fire, June 11–13, 2014, Shanghai, Cina

  44. O’Neill JW, Abu AK, Carradine DM, Moss PJ, Buchanan AH (2014) Predicting the fire performance of structural timber floors. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on structures in fire, June 11–13, 2014, Shanghai, Cina

  45. Hofmann V, Grafe M, Werther N, Winter S (2016) Fire resistance of primary beam—secondary beam connections in timber structures. J Struct Fire Eng 7(2): 126–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Simulia, ABAQUS computer software, Dassault systèmes, Providence, RI, USA

  47. König J, Walleij L (1999). One-dimensional charring of timber exposed to standard and parametric fires in initially unprotected and postprotection situations. Technical Report (no. 9908029), RISE—Research Institutes of Sweden, ISSN 1102-1071

  48. König J (2005) Structural fire design according to Eurocode 5—design rules and their background. Fire Mater 29(3): 147–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. EN 338: 2009 Structural timber-strength classes. CEN (European Committee for Standardization), Brussels, Belgium

  50. www.isocell.com (last accessed: March 2018)

  51. www.steico.com (last accessed: March 2018)

  52. www.knauf.it (last accessed: March 2018)

  53. EN 1365-1 (2012) Fire resistance tests for load bearing elements. Walls—Part 1: General Requirements. CEN (European Committee for Standardization), Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  54. EN 13501 (2007) Fire classification of construction products and building elements. Classification using test data from reaction to fire tests. CEN (European Committee for Standardization), Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  55. EN 1991-1 (2004) Eurocode 1—actions on structures. Part 1-5: general actions—thermal actions. CEN (European Committee for Standardization), Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  56. Laplanche, K, Dhima, D, Racher, P (2004) Predicting the behaviour of dowelled connections in fire: fire test results and heat transfer modelling. In: Proceedings of the 8th world conference on timber engineering—WCTE2004, Lahti, Finland

  57. Werther N, O’Neill JW, Spellman PM, Abu AK, Moss PJ, Buchanan AH, Winter S (2012) Parametric study of modelling structural timber in fire with different software packages. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on structures in fire. Fontana, Frangi, Knobloch (Eds), Zurich, Switzerland, June 6–8

  58. EN 1995-1-2 (2004). Eurocode 5—Design of timber structures. Part 1-2: General—Structural fire design. CEN (European Committee for Standardization), Brussels, Belgium

  59. Schleifer, V (2009). Zum Verhalten von raumabschliessenden mehrschichtigen Holzbauteilen im Brandfall. Doctoral Thesis, ETH Zurich, Switzerland, https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/handle/20.500.11850/151026

  60. [61]Jansson R (2004). Measurement of thermal properties at elevated temperatures—Brandforsk project 328-031. SP Fire Technology, SP Report 2004: 46

    Google Scholar 

  61. Vololonirina O, Coutand M, Perrin B (2014) Characterization of hygrothermal properties of wood-based products—impact of moisture content and temperature. Constr Build Mater 63: 223–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Veitmans K, Grinfelds U (2016) Wood fiber insulation material. For Wood Process 2: 91–98

    Google Scholar 

  63. Bénichou N, Sultan MA, Mac Callum C, Hum JK (2001) Thermal properties of wood, gypsum and insulation at elevated temperatures. NRC Internal report—National Research Council Canada—Institute for Research in Construction, NRC Publications Archive, http://doi.org/10.4244/20378630

  64. EN 1993-1-2: Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures—part 1-2: general rules—structural fire design. CEN (European Committee for Standardization), Brussels, Belgium

Download references

Acknowledgements

Mr. Daniel Gasser and Ms. Annalisa Battisti (Rubner Haus, www.haus.rubner.com) are gratefully acknowledged for providing technical data related to fire resistance test, as well as support for the interpretation of test results through the scientific collaboration with the authors.

The COST Action FP1404 “Fire Safe Use of Bio-Based Building Products” (www.costfp1404.com, 2014–2018) is also acknowledged for facilitating and providing financial support to scientific networking opportunities with international experts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiara Bedon.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bedon, C., Fragiacomo, M. Fire Resistance of Thermally Insulated Log-House Timber Walls. Fire Technol 55, 307–341 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-018-0792-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-018-0792-1

Keywords

Navigation