Skip to main content
Log in

Improved Assessment of Fire Spread over Horizontal Cable Trays Supported by Video Fire Analysis

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fire safety analyses in nuclear power plants need to assess the heat release rate (HRR) of potential cable fires. This study deals with the FLASH-CAT model which assesses the HRR of a fire spreading over horizontal ladder cable trays. As part of the OECD PRISME-2 project, fire tests which involved horizontal trays supported by a wall, highlighted fast fire growth and large HRR peak. This study investigated the ability of the FLASH-CAT model to predict the HRR for such configuration. The first assessments of the PRISME-2 tests with the FLASH-CAT model significantly delayed the ignition and under-estimated the fire growth rate and the HRR peak. A video fire analysis method was developed and contributed to propose updated input parameters, such as the ignition time and the horizontal spread rate, for cable tray configurations with a wall. In addition, modifications in the model which affect the burning cable tray area and the local fire duration are also discussed. The assessments of the PRISME-2 experiments with the modified FLASH-CAT model and the proposed input parameters are consistent with the measured HRR. In addition, the modified model also gives acceptable predictions of the HRR for numerous tests of the CHRISTIFIRE programme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\( A\left( t \right) \) :

Burning cable tray area (m2)

ATH:

Alumina trihydrate

CHF:

Critical heat flux for ignition (kW·m−2)

C p :

Specific heat (kJ·kg−1·K−1)

d :

Cable diameter (m)

e :

Spacing between the cable trays (m)

EVA:

Ethylene–vinyl acetate

HFFR:

Halogen-free flame retardant

HRR:

Heat release rate (kW)

HRRPUA:

Heat release rate per unit area (kW·m−2)

K :

Thermal conductivity (kW·m−1·K−1)

\( L_{b,i} \left( t \right) \) :

Burning length of a cable tray i (m)

L i :

Length of a cable tray i (m)

L 0 :

Length of the gas burner (m)

\( m^{\prime} \) :

Linear mass density (kg·m−1)

M ′′ C :

Combustible mass per unit area (kg·m−2)

n :

Number of cables per tray (–)

N trays :

Number of cable trays (–)

\( \dot{q}_{f}^{{\prime \prime }} \) :

Heat flux from flames to the cable surface (kW·m−2)

\( \dot{Q}\left( t \right) \) :

HRR of horizontal ladder cable tray fire (kW)

\( \dot{Q}_{burner} \left( t \right) \) :

Fire power of the ignition source (kW)

\( \dot{q}_{avg}^{{\prime \prime }} \) :

Average heat release rate per unit area of cable tray (kW·m−2)

PE:

Polyethylene

PVC:

Poly(vinyl chloride)

VFA:

Video fire analysis

V H, i :

Horizontal spread velocity or horizontal spread rate along a cable tray i (m·s−1)

T ig, i :

Ignition time of a cable tray i for vertical spread (s)

T ig :

Ignition temperature of the cables (°C)

T o :

Initial temperature of the cables (°C)

W :

Tray width (m)

\( x_{e,i} \left( t \right) \) :

Location of the extinction front along a cable tray i (mm)

\( x_{f,i} \left( t \right) \) :

Location of the flame front along a cable tray i (mm)

Y p :

Mass fraction of plastic material (–)

β :

Angle formed by the initial V-shaped burning pattern or spread angle (°)

\( \delta \) :

Thermal penetration depth (m)

\( \Delta H_{c,eff} \) :

Effective heat of combustion (MJ·kg−1)

\( \Delta t_{fire} \) :

Fire duration at a given location of a tray or local fire duration (s)

\( \Delta t_{burner} \) :

Fire duration of the gas burner (s)

\( \nu \) :

Char yield (–)

\( \rho \) :

Mass density (kg·m−3)

References

  1. EPRI/NRC-RES (2005) Fire PRA Methodology for nuclear power facilities: vol 2: Detailed methodology. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Palo Alto, CA, and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES), Rockville, MD: 2005, EPRI TR-1011989 and NUREG/CR-6850

  2. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA), Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations (CSNI): OECD FIRE Database, Version: OECD FIRE DB 2014:2, Paris, France, proprietary, for members only

  3. U.S. NRC and EPRI (2007) Verification and validation of selected fire models for nuclear power plant applications, NUREG-1824, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC

  4. Iqbal N, Salley M H, (2004) Fire dynamics tools (FDTs): quantitative fire hazard analysis methods for the U.S. Nuclear regulatory commission fire protection inspection program, Final report, NUREG-1805, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC

  5. Stoliarov SI, Crowley S, Lyon RE, Linteris GT (2009) Prediction of the burning rates of non-charring polymers. Combust Flame 156(5):1068–1083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lautenberger C, Fernandez-Pello C (2009) Generalized pyrolysis model for combustible solids, Fire Saf J 44:819–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Matala A, Lautenberger C, Hostikka S (2012) Generalized direct method for pyrolysis kinetic parameter estimation and comparison to existing methods. J of Fire Sci 30(4):339–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mc Grattan KB, Hostikka S, Floyd JE, Baum HR, Rehm RG, Mell WE, Mc Dermott R (2009) FDS technical reference guide. vol 1: Mathematical model. Technical report, NIST, FDS Version 5.4

  9. Boyer G (2017) Fully coupled CFD simulation of the pyrolysis of non-charring polymers: a predictive approach, Fire Saf J 91:208–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee BT (1985) Heat release rate characteristics of some combustible fuel sources in nuclear power plants, NSBSIR 85-3195, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  11. Babrauskas V (2002) Heat release rates, SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, 3rd edn, Section 3, Chapter 1, pp 3–16

  12. U.S. NRC and EPRI (2004) Fire PRA methodology for nuclear power facilities, NUREG/CR-6850, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  13. McGrattan K, Lock A, Marsh N, Nyden M, Bareham S, Price M, Morgan AB, Galaska M, Schenck K, Stroup D (2012), Cable heat release, ignition, and spread in tray installations during fire (CHRISTIFIRE). Phase 1: Horizontal Trays, NUREG/CR-7010, U.S.NRC

  14. McGrattan K, Bereham S (2013) cable heat release, ignition, and spread in tray installations during fire (CHRISTIFIRE). Phase 2: Vertical Shafts and Corridors, NUREG/CR-7010, Vol. 2, U.S.NRC

  15. Audouin L, Prétrel H, Zavaleta P, OECD PRISME 2 Fire Research Project (2011–2016), 2013, Current status and perspectives. In: 13th international post-conference seminar on fire safety in nuclear power plants and installations, Columbia, USA

  16. Zavaleta P, Charbaut S, Basso G, Audouin L (2013) Multiple horizontal cable tray fire in open atmosphere. In: Thirteenth international conference of the fire and materials, pp 57–68. San Francisco, USA

  17. Investigation heat and smoke propagation mechanisms in multi-compartment fire scenarios. Final report of the PRISME project, NEA/CSNI/R(2017) 14, January 2018

  18. Meinier R, Sonnier R, Zavaleta P, Suard S, Ferry L (2018) Fire behavior of halogen-free flame retardant electrical cables with the cone calorimeter. J Hazard Mater 342:306–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.08.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hanouzet R (2015) Characterization of fire spreading over an installation of multiple cable trays, IRSN technical report, PSN-RES/SA2I-2015-310, October 2015

  20. Tewarson A, Khan M (1992) A new standard test method for the quantification of fire propagation behavior of electrical cables using factory mutual research corporation‘s small-scale flammability apparatus, fire technology 28:215–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Quintiere JG, Surface flame spread, SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, 3rd edn, Section two, Chapter 12. ISBN:087765-451-4

  22. Mowrer F, Williamson R, Flame spread evaluation for thin interior finish materials fire safety science. In: Proceedings of the third international symposium, pp 237–247

  23. Sumitra PS (1982) Categorization of cable flammability. Intermediate-scale fire tests of cable tray installations. Interim report NP-1881, research project 1165-1, Factory Mutual Research Corporation, Norwood, MA

  24. Beyler, C., L. and Hirschler, M., M. (2002) Thermal Decomposition of Polymers, SFPE handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 3rd edn, Section 1, Chapter 7. ISBN:087765-451-4

  25. Zavaleta P, Audouin L (2018) Cable tray fire tests in a confined and mechanically ventilated facility. Fire Mater 42:28–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.2454

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pascal Zavaleta.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zavaleta, P., Hanouzet, R. & Beji, T. Improved Assessment of Fire Spread over Horizontal Cable Trays Supported by Video Fire Analysis. Fire Technol 55, 233–255 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-018-0788-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-018-0788-x

Keywords

Navigation