Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experimental Study on Fire Behaviors of Kerosene/Additive Blends

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The widely used fuels in practical are blended fuel whose combustion characteristics is more complex than those of the single-component fuel in real fire scenarios. The fire behaviors of aviation kerosene/diethylene glycol dimethyl ether (DGM) blends (R-D) and aviation kerosene/ethanol (R-E) blends were studied using a cone calorimeter. The parameters of pool fires, including the ignition time, burning rate, fuel temperature, heat release rate and combustion yield, were investigated. Janssens’ method was adopted to analyze the ignition times of the two blends. Two types of representative burning processes for blended fuel pool fires were identified. For R-D blends, the burning process is similar to that for typical pure fuels. The process for R-E blends, however, is novel, having two obvious burning processes due to the appearance of an intermediate decay stage. The fuel exhaust mass fraction (approximately 15%) was found to be almost constant throughout the intermediate decay stage. The fuel temperature during the experiment indicated that the liquid surface boiling temperature of R-D blends ranges from 162°C to 200°C depending upon the composition of these blends. For R-E blends, the initial boiling temperature is affected by the ethanol ratio, while the boiling temperature in the second process is equal to the boiling temperature of pure RP-3 kerosene. When the ethanol ratio is lower than 40%, the initial boiling temperature of R-E blends is approximately 120°C; when the ethanol ratio is higher than 40%, the boiling temperature is equal to the boiling point of ethanol. A method for calculating the burning rate of each component in the burning processes of the two blends is put forward, with the results agreeing well with the interpretation of the two burning processes. The ratio of the combustion yield CO2/CO and the carbon conversion ratio increase with the oxygenated fuel ratio, indicating that the combustion is more complete when oxygenated fuel is added. These results will be useful for fire hazard assessment and firefighting in terms of fuel storage and transportation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hayasaka H (1997) Unsteady burning rates of small pool fires. Fire Saf Sci 5: 499–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Orloff L, De Ris J (1982) Froude modeling of pool fires. Symp (Int) Combust 19(1): 885–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cetegen BM, Ahmed TA (1993) Experiments on the periodic instability of buoyant plumes and pool fires. Combust Flame 93(1): 157–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fay JA (2006) Model of large pool fires. J Hazard Mater 136(2): 219–232

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Chatris JM et al (2001) Experimental study of burning rate in hydrocarbon pool fires. Combust Flame 126(1–2): 1373–1383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jiang C et al (2016) Experimental study of burning rate in large-scale rectangular pool fire. J Fire Sci 34(4): 323–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fischer SJ, Hardouin-Duparc B, Grosshandler WL (1987) The structure and radiation of an ethanol pool fire. Combust Flame 70(3): 291–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Planas-Cuchi E, Casal J (1998) Flame temperature distribution in a pool-fire. J Hazard Mater 62(3): 231–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Demenezes E et al (2006) Addition of an azeotropic ETBE/ethanol mixture in eurosuper-type gasolines. Fuel 85(17–18): 2567–2577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Withers JW, Quesada-Pineda HJ, Smith RL (2017) Bioeconomy survey results regarding barriers to the United States advanced biofuel industry. BioResources 12(2): 2846–2863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Manin J et al (2014) Effects of oxygenated fuels on combustion and soot formation/oxidation processes. SAE Int J Fuels Lubr 7(2657): 704–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xu Y, Avedisian CT (2015) Combustion ofn-butanol, gasoline, andn-butanol/gasoline mixture droplets. Energy Fuels 29(5): 3467–3475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Imtenan S et al (2014) Impact of oxygenated additives to palm and jatropha biodiesel blends in the context of performance and emissions characteristics of a light-duty diesel engine. Energy Convers Manag 83: 149–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Park W et al (2017) The effect of oxygenated fuel properties on diesel spray combustion and soot formation. Combust Flame 180: 276-283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Barrios CC et al (2014) Effects of the addition of oxygenated fuels as additives on combustion characteristics and particle number and size distribution emissions of a TDI diesel engine. Fuel 132: 93–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kohse-Hoinghaus K et al (2010) Biofuel combustion chemistry: from ethanol to biodiesel. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 49(21): 3572–3597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shi K, Spindler K, Hahne E (2010) Heat transfer in nucleate boiling of R134a/R152a mixtures. Heat Mass Transf 46(10): 1137–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gong M et al (2013) Visualization study on nucleate pool boiling of ethane, isobutane and their binary mixtures. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 51: 164–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li D et al (2009) Effects of dimethyl or diethyl carbonate as an additive on volatility and flash point of an aviation fuel. J Hazard Mater 161(2–3): 1193–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ding Y, Wang C, Lu S (2014) The effect of azeotropism on combustion characteristics of blended fuel pool fire. J Hazard Mater 271: 82–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ben Amara A, Kaoubi S, Starck L (2016) Toward an optimal formulation of alternative jet fuels: enhanced oxidation and thermal stability by the addition of cyclic molecules. Fuel 173: 98–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Won SH et al (2016) Predicting the global combustion behaviors of petroleum-derived and alternative jet fuels by simple fuel property measurements. Fuel 168: 34–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pei X, Hou L (2016) Secondary flow and oxidation coking deposition of aviation fuel. Fuel 167: 68–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ghamari M, Ratner A (2016) Combustion characteristics of diesel and Jet-A droplets blended with polymeric additive. Fuel 178: 63–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang C et al (2016) Recent development in studies of alternative jet fuel combustion: Progress, challenges, and opportunities. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 54: 120–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dabbagh HA et al (2013) The influence of ester additives on the properties of gasoline. Fuel 104: 216–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu H, Hu B, Jin C (2016) Effects of different alcohols additives on solubility of hydrous ethanol/diesel fuel blends. Fuel 184: 440–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rubino L, Thomson MJ (1999) The effect of oxygenated additives on soot precursor formation in a counterflow diffusion flame. SAE Technical Paper

  29. Hoon Song K et al (2003) Effects of oxygenated additives on aromatic species in fuel-rich, premixed ethane combustion: a modeling study. Combust Flame 135(3): 341–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Beatrice C, Bertoli C, Giacomo ND (1998) New findings on combustion behavior of oxygenated synthetic diesel fuels. Combust Sci Technol 137(1–6): 31–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Huang ZH et al (2006) Combustion and emission characteristics of a compression ignition engine fuelled with Diesel–dimethoxy methane blends. Energy Convers Manag 47(11–12): 1402–1415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chiariello F et al (2014) Gaseous and particulate emissions of a micro gas turbine fuelled by straight vegetable oil–kerosene blends. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 56: 16–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mendez C, Parthasarathy R, Gollahalli S (2014) Performance and emission characteristics of butanol/Jet A blends in a gas turbine engine. Appl Energy 118: 135–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mendez C, Parthasarathy R, Gollahalli S (2012) Performance and emission characteristics of a small-scale gas turbine engine fueled with ethanol/Jet A blends. In: 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. p 522

  35. Ji J et al (2016) Experimental study on initial temperature influence on flame spread characteristics of diesel and gasoline–diesel blends. Fuel 178: 283–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Baloo M et al (2016) Effects of pressure and temperature on laminar burning velocity and flame instability of iso-octane/methane fuel blend. Fuel 170: 235–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Li X et al (2011) Convective heat transfer characteristics of China RP-3 aviation kerosene at supercritical pressure. Appl Therm Eng 31(14–15): 2360–2366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Demirbas A (2009) Emission characteristics of gasohol and diesohol. Energy Sour Part A Recovery Util Environ Effects 31(13): 1099–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Arul Mozhi Selvan V, Anand RB, Udayakumar M (2009) Combustion characteristics of diesohol using biodiesel as an additive in a direct injection compression ignition engine under various compression ratios. Energy Fuels 23(11): 5413–5422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Patra J et al (2015) Studies of combustion characteristics of kerosene ethanol blends in an axi-symmetric combustor. Fuel 144: 205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Arteconi A, Mazzarini A, Di Nicola G (2011) Emissions from ethers and organic carbonate fuel additives: a review. Water Air Soil Pollution 221(1–4): 405–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Poling BE, Prausnitz JM, O’connell JP (2001) The properties of gases and liquids, vol 5. Mcgraw-hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  43. Pei X-Y, Hou L-Y (2016) Effect of dissolved oxygen concentration on coke deposition of kerosene. Fuel Process Technol 142: 86–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Liu H et al (2011) Comparison of ethanol and butanol as additives in soybean biodiesel using a constant volume combustion chamber. Energy Fuels 25(4): 1837–1846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wu N, Torero JL (1998) Enhanced burning of difficult to ignite/burn fuels including heavy oils. US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wu N et al (1998) The effect of weathering on piloted ignition and flash point of a slick of oil. In: Arctic and marine oilspill program technical seminar. Ministry of supply and services, Canada

  47. Putorti A, Evans D, Tennyson E (1994) Ignition of weathered and emulsified oils. In: Arctic and marine oilspill program technical seminar. Ministry of supply and services, Canada

  48. Lawson D, Simms UD (1952) The ignition of wood by radiation. Br J Appl Phys 3(9): 288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Babrauskas V (2003) Ignition handbook, vol 98027. Fire Science Publishers, Issaquah

    Google Scholar 

  50. Chen X et al (2014) Experimental study on ignition and combustion characteristics of typical oils. Fire Mater 38(3): 409–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Chen B et al (2011) Initial fuel temperature effects on burning rate of pool fire. J Hazard Mater 188(1–3): 369–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Liu J et al (2016) The burning behaviors of pool fire flames under low pressure. Fire Mater 40(2): 318–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhang J et al (2012) Impacts of elevation on pool fire behavior in a closed compartment: a study based upon a distinct stratification phenomenon. J Fire Sci 31(2): 178–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2016YFC0802500) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51706218).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Fire Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, Anhui Province, China

    Xuehui Wang, Tiannian Zhou, Qinpei Chen, Chao Ding & Jian Wang

  2. School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, Australia

    Yaping He

Authors
  1. Xuehui Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yaping He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tiannian Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qinpei Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chao Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jian Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Wang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., He, Y., Zhou, T. et al. Experimental Study on Fire Behaviors of Kerosene/Additive Blends. Fire Technol 54, 1841–1869 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-018-0776-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-018-0776-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation