Skip to main content
Log in

Real-Time Forecasting of Building Fire Growth and Smoke Transport via Ensemble Kalman Filter

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forecasting building fire growth and smoke dispersion is a challenging task but can provide early warnings to first responders and building occupants and thus significantly benefit active building fire protection. Although existent computer simulation models may provide acceptable estimations of smoke temperature and quantity, most simulations are still not able to achieve real-time forecast of building fire due to high computational requirements, and/or simulation accuracy subject to users’ inputs. This paper investigates one of the possibilities of using ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF), a statistical method utilizing the real-time sensor data from thermocouple trees in each room, to estimate the spread of an accidental building fire and further forecast smoke dispersion in real time. A general approach to forecasting building fire and smoke is outlined and demonstrated by a 1:5 scaled compartment fire experiment using a 1.0 kW to 2.8 kW propane burner as fire source. The results indicate that the EnKF method is able to forecast smoke transport in a multi-room building fire using 40 ensemble members and provide noticeable accuracy and lead time. Unlike other methods that directly use measurement data as model inputs, the developed model is able to statistically update model parameters to maintain the forecasting accuracy in real time. The results obtained from the model can be potentially applied to assist mechanical smoke removal, emergency evacuation and firefighting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

c p :

Specific heat of air in constant pressure, kJ/kgK

C s :

Smoke layer height factor

c v :

Specific heat of air in constant volume, kJ/kgK

H :

Height, m

H d :

Smoke layer height, m

K :

Kalman gain

\( \dot{m} \) :

Mass flow rate kg/s

P :

Pressure, kPa

P f :

Forecasted error covariance

q :

Number of ensemble member

\( \dot{q} \) :

Energy flux, kW

T :

Temperature, °C

t :

Time, second

V :

Volume, m3

v :

Velocity, m/s

w :

Width of opening, m

x :

Model states

y :

Measurement

γ :

Ratio of cp to cv

θ:

Localization factor

ρ :

Density, kg/m3

ϕ :

Control parameters

amb:

Ambient

l :

Lower zone

u :

Upper zone

vent:

Ventilation

z :

Height, m

a :

Analyzed

f :

Forecasted

BAS:

Building automation system

EnKF:

Ensemble Kalman filter

CFD:

Computational fluid dynamics

PIV:

Particle image velocimetry

FDS:

Fire dynamic simulator

RMSE:

Root mean squared error

HRR:

Heat release rate

References

  1. Cowlard A, Jahn W, Abecassis-Empis C, Rein G, Torero JL (2010) Sensor assisted fire fighting. Fire Technol 46:719–741. doi: 10.1007/s10694-008-0069-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang D, Hu LH, Jiang YQ, Huo R, Zhao XY (2010) Comparison of FDS predictions by different combustion models with measured data for enclosure fires. Fire Saf J 45:298–313. doi: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2010.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Koo S-H, Fraser-Mitchell J,Welch S (2010) Sensor-steered fire simulation. Fire Saf J 45(3):193–205. doi: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2010.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jahn W, Rein G, Torero J. (2011) Forecasting fire growth using an inverse zone modelling approach. Fire Safety J 46(3):81–88. doi: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2010.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jahn W, Rein G, Torero J. (2012) Forecasting fire dynamics using inverse computational fluid dynamics and tangent linearisation. Advances in Engineering Software 47(1):114–126. doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Beji, T., Verstockt, S., Van de Walle, R. and Merci, B. (2014) On the use of real-time video to forecast fire growth in enclosures. Fire Technol 50(4):1021–1040. doi: 10.1007/s10694-012-0262-0

    Google Scholar 

  7. Overholt, K. J. and Ezekoye, O. (2012) Characterizing heat release rates using an inverse fire modeling technique. Fire Technol 48(4):893–909. doi: 10.1007/s10694-011-0250-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Overholt, K. J. and Ezekoye, O. (2014) Quantitative testing of fire scenario hypotheses: a bayesian inference approach. Fire Technol 51(2):335–367. doi: 10.1007/s10694-013-0384-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Price and A. Trouvé (2015) A Multi-observable approach to address the Ill-posed nature of inverse fire modeling problems. Fire Technol. doi: 10.1007/s10694-015-0541-7

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lin C-C, Wang L (2013) Forecasting simulations of indoor environment using data assimilation via an Ensemble Kalman Filter. Build Environ 64:169–176. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Heskestad G (1984) Engineering relations for fire plumes. Fire Saf J 7:25–32. doi: 10.1016/0379-7112(84)90005-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tanaka T (1983) A model of multiroom fire spread. Fire Sci Technol 3:105–121. doi: 10.3210/fst.3.105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Peacock RD, Davis S, Lee BT (1988) Experimental data set for the accuracy assessment of room fire models. National Bureau of Standards 88-3752.

  14. Peacock RD, Reneke PA (2007) Verification and validation of selected fire models for nuclear power plant applications. Vol. 5. Consolidated fire growth and smoke transport model (CFAST). NUREG-1824, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.

  15. Ji J, Li M, Li K, Yuan M, Sun J (2015) Ambient wind effect on combustion characteristcs in compartment with simutaneous door and window opened. Energy Build 105:217–225. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.07.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Evensen G (1994) Sequential Data Assimilation with a Non-Linear Quasi-Geostrophic Model Using Monte Carlo Methods to Forecast Error Statistics. J Geophys Res 99:10,143-10,162. doi: 10.1029/94JC00572

  17. Lin C-C, Wang LL (2015) Forecasting smoke transport during compartment fires using a data assimilation model. J Fire Sci 33(1):3–21. doi: 10.1177/0734904114548837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hamill TM, Whitaker JS (2001) Distance-dependent filtering of background error covariance estimates in an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon Weather Rev 129:2276-2790. Doi: 10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<2776:DDFOBE>2.0.CO;2

    Google Scholar 

  19. Houtekamer PL, Mitchell HL (2001) A sequential ensemble Kalman filter for atmospheric data assimilation. Mon Weather Rev 129:123–137. doi: 10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0123:ASEKFF>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the financial supports from the Discovery Grants of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) (No. 402848-2012) (2012–2017) and the Concordia University Research Chair (CURC) New Scholar for the Building Fire Safety, Smoke, Airflow and Thermal Management program (2014–2019). The authors also thank Dr. Wael Saleh and Guanchao (Jeremy) Zhao for the technical supports of conducting the fire and PIV experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liangzhu (Leon) Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, CC., Wang, L. Real-Time Forecasting of Building Fire Growth and Smoke Transport via Ensemble Kalman Filter. Fire Technol 53, 1101–1121 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-016-0619-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-016-0619-x

Keywords

Navigation