Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Efficiency of Heptafluoropropane Fire Extinguishing Agent on Suppressing the Lithium Titanate Battery Fire

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To investigate the efficiency of heptafluoropropane fire extinguishing agent on suppressing the lithium titanate battery fire, an experimental system was designed and built to perform the extinguishing test. The lithium titanate battery (50 Ah, 2.3 V) with diameter of 66 mm and length of 260 mm was used. A 5 kW electric heater was set under the battery to trigger the thermal runaway of the battery. When the battery fire occurs, the heptafluoropropane was immediately discharged by opening the agent storage tank till to the fire was extinguished. The battery temperatures, ignition time, release time of the agent, time to extinguish the fire, battery mass loss, amount of used agent and mean discharge rate of agent were obtained and analysed. The results illustrate that the single cell or small-scale battery pack fire can be extinguished by heptafluoropropane in the tests. Therefore, heptafluoropropane is a fire extinguishing agent candidate to put down the lithium titanate battery fire. However, due to the violent reactions still ongoing inner the cell and flammable gases ejecting continuously from the cell, the battery may be reignited after it is put down. So it was suggested that the heptafluoropropane agent should be applied as early as possible and with longer spray time than the usual case to avoid the reignition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

References

  1. Ren F, Cox T, Wang H (2014) Thermal runaway risk evaluation of Li-ion cells using a pinch–torsion test. J Power Sources 249:156–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Omar N, Monem MA, Firouz Y et al. (2014) Lithium iron phosphate based battery—assessment of the aging parameters and development of cycle life model. Appl Energy 113:1575–1585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lamb J, Orendorff CJ (2014) Evaluation of mechanical abuse techniques in lithium ion batteries. J Power Sources 247:189–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Waag W, Käbitz S, Sauer DU (2013) Experimental investigation of the lithium-ion battery impedance characteristic at various conditions and aging states and its influence on the application. Appl Energy 102:885–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Darcovich K, Henquin E, Kenney B et al. (2013) Higher-capacity lithium ion battery chemistries for improved residential energy storage with micro-cogeneration. Appl Energy 111:853–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jhu C-Y, Wang Y-W, Wen C-Y, Shu C-M (2012) Thermal runaway potential of LiCoO2 and Li (Ni1/3Co1/3Mn1/3) O2 batteries determined with adiabatic calorimetry methodology. Appl Energy 100:127–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jhu C-Y, Wang Y-W, Shu C-M et al. (2011) Thermal explosion hazards on 18650 lithium ion batteries with a VSP2 adiabatic calorimeter. J Hazard Mater 192:99–107

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bandhauer TM, Garimella S, Fuller TF (2011) A critical review of thermal issues in lithium-ion batteries. J Electrochem Soc 158:R1–R25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goodenough JB, Kim Y (2009) Challenges for rechargeable Li batteries. Chem Mater 22:587–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Saito Y (2005) Thermal behaviors of lithium-ion batteries during high-rate pulse cycling. J Power Sources 146:770–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Holzapfel M, Alloin F, Yazami R (2004) Calorimetric investigation of the reactivity of the passivation film on lithiated graphite at elevated temperatures. Electrochim Acta 49:581–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gnanaraj J, Zinigrad E, Asraf L et al. A detailed investigation of the thermal reactions of LiPF6 solution in organic carbonates using ARC and DSC. J Electrochem Soc 150:A1533–A1537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamaki J-I, Takatsuji H, Kawamura T, Egashira M (2002) Thermal stability of graphite anode with electrolyte in lithium-ion cells. Solid State Ion 148:241–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. MacNeil D, Dahn J. The reaction of charged cathodes with nonaqueous solvents and electrolytes: I. Li0.5CoO2. J Electrochem Soc 148:A1205–A1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dagan S (2000) Comparison of gas chromatography—pulsed flame photometric detection—mass spectrometry, automated mass spectral deconvolution and identification system and gas chromatography—tandem mass spectrometry as tools for trace level detection and identification. J Chromatogr A 868:229–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Andersson A, Edström K, Rao N, Wendsjö Å (1999) Temperature dependence of the passivation layer on graphite. J Power Sources 81:286–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang Q, Sun J, Yao X, Chen C (2006) Thermal behavior of lithiated graphite with electrolyte in lithium-ion batteries. J Electrochem Soc 153:A329–A333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang Q, Ping P, Zhao X et al. (2012) Thermal runaway caused fire and explosion of lithium ion battery. J Power Sources 208:210–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang Q, Ping P, Sun J, Chen C (2011) The effect of mass ratio of electrolyte and electrodes on the thermal stabilities of electrodes used in lithium ion battery. Thermochim Acta 517:16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ping P, Wang Q, Sun J et al. (2010) Thermal stabilities of some lithium salts and their electrolyte solutions with and without contact to a LiFePO4 electrode. J Electrochem Soc 157:A1170–A1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Andersson P, Blomqvist P, Lorén A, Larsson F (2013) Investigation of fire emissions from Li-ion batteries. SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden

  22. Mikolajczak C, Kahn M, White K, Long RT (2011) Lithium-ion batteries hazard and use assessment. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Rhein R (1992) An experimental study of the use of liquid argon and argon-filled aqueous foams for the extinction of lithium fires. Fire Technol 28:290–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rhein RA, Carlton CM (1993) Extinction of lithium fires: Thermodynamic computations and experimental data from literature. Fire Technol 29:100–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51176183) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. WK2320000034). Dr. Q. S. Wang is supported by Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (No. 2013286).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qingsong Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Q., Shao, G., Duan, Q. et al. The Efficiency of Heptafluoropropane Fire Extinguishing Agent on Suppressing the Lithium Titanate Battery Fire. Fire Technol 52, 387–396 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-015-0531-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-015-0531-9

Keywords

Navigation