Advertisement

Fire Technology

, Volume 52, Issue 1, pp 273–279 | Cite as

Firefighter Wayfinding in Dark Environments Monitored by RFID

  • Gary Li-Kai Hsiao
  • Chieh-Hsin Tang
  • Te-Chin Huang
  • Ching-Yuan Lin
Article

Abstract

A building on fire is a smoky and dark environment both for firefighters and for civilians trapped inside. The faster firefighters find a way to search for and rescue civilians at a fire scene, the higher the survival rate of those trapped inside. This study presents a discussion on the characteristics of firefighter wayfinding under low visibility. The firefighters who participated in this study underwent testing at a training ground. The participants’ search and wayfinding paths were recorded using radiofrequency identification (RFID) technology. The results revealed that the mean searching time in each room decreased from 135 to 19 s as the firefighters became increasingly familiarized with the task. As expected, data also shows that smaller rooms contributed to shorter searching times. Most participants could manage a maximum of three rooms, with wayfinding confusion manifested after they had searched through the third room. These findings are crucial for the design of fireground strategies and training.

Keywords

Firefighter Wayfinding RFID Dark environment 

References

  1. 1.
    Rubadiri L, Ndumu DT, Roberts JP (1997) Predicting the evacuation capability of mobility-impaired occupants. Fire Technol 33:32–53. doi: 10.1023/A:1015318311881 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pires TT (2005) An approach for modeling human cognitive behavior in evacuation models. Fire Saf J 40:177–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Purser DA, Bensilum M (2001) Quantification of behaviour for engineering design standards and escape time calculations. Saf Sci 38:157–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tang CH, Wu WT, Lin CY (2009) Using virtual reality to determine how emergency signs facilitate way-finding. Appl Ergon 40:722–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Punakallio A, Lusa S, Luukkonen R (2003). Protective equipment affects balance abilities differently in younger and older firefighters. Aviat Space Environ Med 74:1151–1156Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wade LR, Weimar WH, Davis J (2004) Effect of personal protective eyewear on postural stability. Ergonomics 47:1614–1623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nejad KK, Jiang X, Kameyama M (2013). RFID-based localization with non-blocking tag scanning. Ad Hoc Netw 11:2264–2272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tsai CY, Chung SH (2012) A personalized route recommendation service for theme parks using RFID information and tourist behavior. Decis Support Syst 52:514–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Van Oranje C, Schindler R et al (2009) Study on the requirements and options for radio frequency identification (RFID) application in healthcare. RAND Corporation, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lieshout MV, Grossi L et al (2007) RFID technologies: Emerging issues, challenges and policy options. European CommissionGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li N, Becerik-Gerber B (2011) Performance-based evaluation of RFID-based indoor location sensing solutions for the built environment. Adv Eng Inform 25:535–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Motamedi A, Soltani MM, Hammad A (2013) Localization of RFID-equipped assets during the operation phase of facilities. Adv Eng Inform 27(4):566–579. doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2013.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary Li-Kai Hsiao
    • 1
  • Chieh-Hsin Tang
    • 2
  • Te-Chin Huang
    • 3
  • Ching-Yuan Lin
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of ArchitectureNational Taiwan University of Science and TechnologyNew Taipei CityTaiwan, ROC
  2. 2.Department of Interior DesignTungnan UniversityNew Taipei CityTaiwan
  3. 3.Fire DepartmentNew Taipei City GovernmentNew Taipei CityTaiwan
  4. 4.Department of ArchitectureNational Taiwan University of Science and TechnologyNew Taipei CityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations