Optimization of Emergency Ventilation Strategies in a Roadway Tunnel
- 255 Downloads
In order to evaluate the effectiveness of in-place emergency ventilation strategies to control smoke spread in the event of a fire in a section of a roadway tunnel, both numerical and experimental studies were performed. The experimental study was conducted to provide the necessary initial and boundary conditions for the numerical phase of the investigation. A fire heat release rate of 1 MW was used in all fire tests. This fire heat release rate was selected to minimize the risk of damage to the tunnel and its associated systems while producing reliable data for visualizing the smoke movement in the tunnel. The numerical study used Computational Fluid Dynamics, Fire Dynamic Simulator version 4.0 to investigate smoke removal in the tunnel for large fire of 30 MW (bus or truck on fire). In total, four field fire tests and seven numerical simulations were conducted. Based on the study results, recommendations were made to optimize the ventilation scenarios in the tunnel section. This article presents the details of the study as well as the recommendations made.
KeywordsEmergency ventilation strategies Roadway tunnels Fire incidents Visibility Smoke backlayering Computational fluid dynamics Field fire test Fire dynamics simulator
The authors acknowledge the NRC’s researchers and technical staff and the staff of the Ministère des Transports du Québec who immensely contributed in conducting the successful in situ fire tests.
- 1.Heselden AJM (1976) Studies of fire and smoke behaviour relevant to tunnels. Proceedings of second international symposium on the aerodynamics and ventilation of vehicle tunnels, Cambridge, BHRA, paper J1Google Scholar
- 2.National Fire Protection Association (2008) NFPA 502 standard for road tunnels, bridges, and other limited access highways, NFPA, Quincy, MAGoogle Scholar
- 3.Kashef A, Saber HH (2008) CFD simulations for verification of ventilation strategies in tube C of the Ville-Marie tunnel in Montréal City. 5th NRC symposium on computational fluid dynamics and multi-scale modelling, Ottawa, Canada, Jan 21, 2008Google Scholar
- 4.Klote J, Milke J (2002) Principles of smoke management. ASHRAE, Inc., 1791 Tullie Circle NE, Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
- 5.McGrattan KB, Baum HR, Rehm RG, Forney GP, Floyd JE, Hostikka S (2003) Fire dynamics simulator (version 4), technical reference guide (technical report NISTIR 6783). National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, Sep 2003.Google Scholar
- 6.McGrattan KB, Hostikka S, Floyd JE, Baum HR, Rehm RG (2007) Fire dynamics simulator (version 5), technical reference guide. NIST Special Publication 1018-5, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, Oct 2007.Google Scholar
- 8.Liu ZG, Kashef A, Crampton A, Lougheed G, Ko Y, Hadjisophocleous G, Almand KH (2008) Findings of the international road tunnel fire detection research project. Fire Technol J. ISSN 0015-2684, doi: 10.1007/s10694-008-0067-3
- 9.PIARC Committee on Road Tunnels (1999) Fire and smoke control in road tunnels. PIARC––World Road AssociationGoogle Scholar