Skip to main content
Log in

Home Smoke Alarms: The Data as Context for Decision

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Considerable attention has been devoted to how home smoke alarms could be more effective at preventing fire deaths. The death rate per 100 reported home fires is half as high in homes with working smoke alarms compared to homes without this protection. This paper summarizes what is known about the performance and effectiveness of home smoke alarms and of victim characteristics in home fires with and without operating smoke alarms based on statistical analysis of actual fire experience data. Special studies on other factors affecting smoke alarm performance, audibility, and nuisance alarms are also discussed. The paper also identifies several questions that cannot, at present, be conclusively addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National fire incident reporting system 5.0 complete reference guide, U.S. Fire Administration National Fire Data Center Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Emmitsburg, MD 2006

  2. Hall J Jr, Harwood B (1989) The national estimates approach to U.S. fire statistics. Fire Technol 25(2):99–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aerospace Corporation (1977) Survey and analysis of occupant-installable smoke detectors. Washington, DC

  4. Elrick and Lavidge, Inc., (1980) A detector in every other home: results of a survey of smoke and fire detector owners: full report, prepared for federal emergency management agency, Atlanta

  5. US Fire Administration (1983) Residential smoke and fire detector coverage in the united states: findings from a 1982 survey. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC

  6. Prevention Index series based on surveys done by Louis Harris and Associates were used for 1983–1995 estimates

  7. 1997 Fire Awareness Survey for NFPA, 1999 NFPA National Fire Escape Survey, and 2004 Fire Prevention Week survey for NFPA

  8. U.S. Census Bureau (2004) Housing and household economic statistics division “historical census of housing tables: telephones”

  9. Smith C (1993) Smoke detector operability survey—report on findings. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Bethesda, MD

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peek-Asa C, Allareddy V, Yan J, Taylor C, Lundell J, Zwerling C (2005) When one is not enough: prevalence and characteristics of homes not adequately protected by smoke alarms. Inj Prev 11(11):364–368. doi:10.1136/ip.2005.009175

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee A, Midgett J, White S (2004) A review of the sound effectiveness of residential smoke alarms. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission

  12. Lee A The audibility of smoke alarms in residential homes, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Bethesda, MD, September 2005, revised January 2007

  13. Bruck D (2001) The who, what, where and why of waking to fire alarms: a review. Fire Safety J 36:623–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bruck D, Reid S, Kouzma J, Ball M (2004) The effectiveness of different alarms in waking sleeping children. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on human behavior in fire 2004, London, England, Interscience Communications Limited, pp 279–289

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ball M, Bruck D (2004) The effect of alcohol upon response to fire alarm signals in sleeping adults. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on human behavior in fire 2004, London, England, Interscience Communications Limited, pp 291–301

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bruck D, Thomas I, Kritikos A (2006) Investigation of auditory arousal with different alarm signals in sleeping older adults. The Fire Protection Research Foundation, Quincy, MA, pp 7–9

    Google Scholar 

  17. Smith C (1993) Smoke detector operability survey—report on findings. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Bethesda, MD

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fazzini T, Perkins R, Grossman D (2000) Ionization and photoelectric smoke alarms in rural alaskan homes. West J Med 173:89–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bukowski R, Peacock R, Averill J, Cleary T, Bryner N, Walton W, Reneke P, Kuligowski E (2004) NIST technical note 1455, performance of home smoke alarms: analysis of the response of several available technologies in residential fire settings. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Washington, DC, p 250

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rowland D, GiGuisseppi C, Roberts I, Curtis K, Roberts H, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Wade A (2002) Prevalence of working smoke alarms in local authority inner city housing: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 325:998–1001 doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7371.998

    Google Scholar 

  21. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2006) Fires in the home: findings from the 2004/05 survey of english housing, London, UK

  22. Bukowski R, Peacock R, Averill J, Cleary T, Bryner N, Walton W, Reneke P, Kuligowski E (2004) NIST technical note 1455, performance of home smoke alarms: analysis of the response of several available technologies in residential fire settings. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Washington, DC, pp xix–xxii, 248–249

  23. Remembering when™: a fire and fall prevention program for older adults conference, Boston, December 2–4, 2007

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marty Ahrens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahrens, M. Home Smoke Alarms: The Data as Context for Decision. Fire Technol 44, 313–327 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-008-0045-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-008-0045-9

Keywords

Navigation