Advertisement

Journal of Financial Services Research

, Volume 50, Issue 3, pp 311–339 | Cite as

A Two-Stage Probit Model for Predicting Recovery Rates

  • Ruey-Ching Hwang
  • Huimin Chung
  • C. K. Chu
Article

Abstract

We propose a two-stage probit model (TPM) to predict recovery rates. By the ordinal nature of the three categories of recovery rates: total loss, total recovery, and lying between the two extremes, we first use the ordered probit model to predict the category that a given debt belongs to among the three ones. Then, for the debt that is classified as lying between the two extremes, we use the probit transformation regression to predict its recovery rate. We use real data sets to support TPM. Our empirical results show that macroeconomic-, debt-, firm-, and industry-specific variables are all important in determining recovery rates. Using an expanding rolling window approach, our empirical results confirm that TPM has better and more robust out-of-sample performance than its alternatives, in the sense of yielding more accurate predicted recovery rates.

Keywords

Expanding rolling window approach Ordered probit model Probit transformation regression Two-stage probit model Recovery rate 

JEL classification

G21 G28 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions that have greatly improved the presentation of this paper. This research is supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, Republic of China.

References

  1. Acharya VV, Bharath ST, Srinivasan A (2007) Does industrywide distress affect defaulted firms? Evidence from creditor recoveries. J Financ Econ 85:787–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agresti A (2002) Categorical data analysis. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aitchison J, Silvey SD (1957) The generalization of probit analysis to the case of multiple responses. Biometrika 44:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Altman E (1968) Financial ratios, discriminant analysis, and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. J Financ 23:589–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Altman E, Kalotay EA (2014) Ultimate recovery mixtures. J Bank Financ 40:116–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Altman E, Kishore VM (1996) Almost everything you wanted to know about recoveries on defaulted bonds. Financ Anal J 52:57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Andersen L, Sidenius J (2005) Extensions to the Gaussian copula: random recovery and random factor loadings. J Credit Risk 1:29–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Asarnow E, Edwards D (1995) Measuring loss on default bank loans: a 24-year study. J Commerc Lending 77:11–23Google Scholar
  9. Bastos JA (2010) Forecasting bank loans loss-given-default. J Bank Financ 34:2510–2517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Begley J, Ming J, Watts S (1996) Bankruptcy classification errors in the 1980s: an empirical analysis of Altman’s and Ohlson’s models. Rev Acc Stud 1:267–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bellotti T, Crook J (2012) Loss given default models incorporating macroeconomic variables for credit cards. Int J Forecast 28:171–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bharath ST, Shumway T (2008) Forecasting default with the Merton distance to default model. Rev Financ Stud 21:1339–1369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bhojraj S, Sengupta P (2003) The effect of corporate governance mechanisms on bond ratings and yields: the role of institutional investors and outside directors. J Bus 76:455–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blume ME, Lim F, MacKinlay AC (1998) The declining credit quality of U.S. corporate debt: myth or reality? J Financ 53:1389–1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Borooah VK (2002) Logit and probit. SAGE Publications, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Calabrese R (2014) Predicting bank loan recovery rates with mixed continuous-discrete model. Appl Stoch Model Bus Ind 30:99–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Calabrese R, Zenga M (2010) Bank loan recovery rates: measuring and nonparametric density estimation. J Bank Financ 34:903–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Campbell JY, Hilscher J, Szilagyi J (2008) In search of distress risk. J Financ 63:2899–2939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Caselli S, Gatti S, Querci F (2008) The sensitivity of the loss given default rate to systematic risk: New empirical evidence on bank loans. J Financ Serv Res 34:1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chava S, Stefanescu C, Turnbull S (2011) Modeling the loss distribution. Manage Sci 57:1267–1287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fawcett T (2006) An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recogn Lett 27:861–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ferrari SLP, Cribari-Neto F (2004) Beta regression for modeling rates and proportions. J Appl Stat 31:799–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Friedman CA, Sandow S (2005) Estimating conditional probability distributions of recovery rates: a utility-based approach. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=874754
  24. Härdle W, Moro RA, Schäfer D (2008) Graphical data representation in bankruptcy analysis. In: Chen C, Härdle W, Unwin A (eds) Handbook of data visualization. Springer, Berlin, pp 853–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hillegeist SA, Keating EK, Cram DP, Lundstedt KG (2004) Assessing the probability of bankruptcy. Rev Acc Stud 9:5–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hwang RC (2012) A varying-coefficient default model. Int J Forecast 28:675–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hwang RC, Cheng KF, Lee JC (2007) A semiparametric method for predicting bankruptcy. J Forecast 26:317–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hwang RC, Cheng KF, Lee CF (2009) On multiple-class prediction of issuer credit ratings. Appl Stoch Model Bus Ind 25:535–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hwang RC, Chung H, Chu CK (2010) Predicting issuer credit ratings using a semiparametric method. J Empir Financ 17:120–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaplan RS, Urwitz G (1979) Statistical models of bond ratings: a methodological inquiry. J Bus 52:231–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Loterman G, Brown I, Martens D, Mues C, Baesens B (2012) Benchmarking regression algorithms for loss given default modeling. Int J Forecast 28:161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maddala GS (1987) Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. McCullagh P (1980) Regression models for ordinal data. J R Stat Soc B 42:109–142Google Scholar
  34. Moody’s (2012) Annual default study: corporate default and recovery rates, 1920–2011. Moody’s Corporation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Ospina R, Ferrari SLP (2010) Inflated beta distributions. Stat Papers 51:111–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Qi M, Zhao X (2011) Comparison of modeling methods for loss given default. J Bank Financ 35:2842–2855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sigrist F, Stahel WA (2011) Using the censored gamma distribution for modeling fractional response variables with an application to loss given default. ASTIN Bull 41:673–710Google Scholar
  38. Standard & Poor’s (2012) Default, transition, and recovery: 2011 annual U.S. corporate default study and rating transitions. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, 2nd edn. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  40. Yashkir O, Yashkir Y (2013) Loss given default modeling: a comparative analysis. J Risk Model Valid 7:25–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of FinanceNational Dong Hwa UniversityHualienTaiwan
  2. 2.Graduate Institute of FinanceNational Chiao Tung UniversityHsinchuTaiwan
  3. 3.Department of Applied MathematicsNational Dong Hwa UniversityHualienTaiwan

Personalised recommendations