Advertisement

Journal of Financial Services Research

, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 83–102 | Cite as

Mutual Fund Trading and Portfolio Disclosures

  • Cristina Ortiz
  • Gloria Ramírez
  • Luis Vicente
Article

Abstract

This is the first study in a large European market which analyzes monthly portfolios to obtain evidence of equity fund trading around quarterly reports. A new portfolio-weight approach shows that managers disclose large-cap and well-known stocks with higher returns and hide the same return-loser stocks in the reporting months. A fund-size agency problem plays an important role in this window dressing evidence. Fund trading also shows that managers benefits from the January effect by buying small-cap stocks at the beginning of the year rather than causing this anomaly.

Keywords

Mutual funds Window dressing January effect Agency problem Intra-quarter trading 

JEL Classification

G11 G12 G23 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the UCEIF Foundation, research project ECO2009-12819-C03-02 of the Spanish Department of Science, and research project 268–159 of the University of Zaragoza for their financial support. We appreciate insightful comments from David Musto (editor) and the anonymous referee, Manuel Armada, Alexander Kempf, Van Thi Tuong Nguyen, Auke Plantinga, José Luis Sarto, and the participants of the EFMA 2011 annual meeting. Any possible errors in this article are the exclusive responsibility of the authors.

References

  1. Ackert LF, Athanassakos G (2000) Institutional investors, analyst following, and the january anomaly. J Bus Finance Account 27(3–4):469–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agarwal V, Jiang W, Tang Y, Yang B (2013) Uncovering hedge fund skill from the portfolio holdings they hide. J Finance 68(2):739–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernhardt D, Davies RJ (2005) Painting the tape: aggregate evidence. Econ Letters 89(3):306–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown KC, Harlow WV, Starks LT (1996) Of tournaments and temptations: an analysis of managerial incentives in the mutual fund industry. J Finance 51(1):85–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carhart MM, Kaniel R, Musto D, Reed AV (2002) Leaning for the tape: evidence of gaming behavior in equity mutual funds. J Finance 57(2):661–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dyl EA (1977) Capital gains taxation and year-end stock market behavior. J Finance 32(1):165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elton EJ, Gruber MJ, Blake CR (2012) An examination of mutual fund timing ability using monthly holding data. Rev Finance 16(3):619–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elton EJ, Gruber MJ, Blake CR, Krasny Y, Ozelge SO (2010) The effect of holdings data frequency on conclusions about mutual fund behavior. J Banking Financ 34:912–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gallagher DR, Gardner P, Swan PL (2009) Portfolio pumping: an examination of investment manager quarter-end trading and impact on performance. Pacific-Basin Financ J 17:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haugen RA, Lakonishok J (1988) The incredible january effect: the stock market’s unsolved mystery. Dow-Jones-Irwin, Homewood, IIIGoogle Scholar
  11. He J, Ng L, Wang Q (2004) Quarterly trading patterns of financial institutions. J Bus 77(3):493–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ippolito RA (1992) Consumer reaction to measures of poor quality: evidence from the mutual fund industry. J Law Econ 35(1):45–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kacperczyk M, Sialm C, Zheng L (2008) Unobserved actions of mutual funds. Rev Financ Stud 21(6):2379–2416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kotomin V, Winters DB (2006) Quarter-End effects in banks: preferred habitat or window dressing. J Financ Serv Res 29(1):61–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lakonishok J, Shleifer A, Thaler R, Vishny R (1991) Window dressing by pension fund managers. Amer Econ Rev 81(2):227–231Google Scholar
  16. Lee C, Porter DC, Weaver DG (1998) Indirect tests of the haugen-Lakonishok small-firm/january effect hypotheses: window dressing versus performance hedging. Financ Rev 33(2):177–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liao T-L, Huang C-J, Wu C-Y (2010) Do fund managers herd to counter investor sentiment? J Bus Res 64(2):207–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meier I, Schaumburg E (2006) Do funds window dress? Evidence for U.S. domestic equity mutual funds. Northwestern UniversityGoogle Scholar
  19. Morey MR, O’Neal ES (2006) Window dressing in bond mutual funds. J Financ Res 29(3):325–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Musto D (1997) Portfolio disclosures and year-end price shifts. J Financ 52(4):1563–1588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Musto D (1999) Investment decisions depend on portfolio disclosures. J Financ 54(3):935–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ng L, Wang Q (2004) Institutional trading and the turn-of-the-year effect. J Financ Econ 74:343–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ortiz C, Ramírez G, Vicente LA (2010) Quarterly return patterns in the spanish stock market. Appl Financ Econ 20(23):1829–1838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ortiz C, Sarto JL, Vicente LA (2012) Portfolios in disguise? window dressing in bond fund holdings. J Bank Financ 36:418–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Petersen MA (2008) Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: comparing approaches. Rev Financ Stud 22:435–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sias RW, Starks LT (1997) Institutions and individuals at the turn-of-the-year. J Finance 52(4):1543–1562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sirri ER, Tufano P (1998) Costly search and mutual fund flows. J Financ 53(5):1589–1622CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Accounting and FinanceUniversidad de ZaragozaZaragozaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Industrial EngineeringUniversidad de AntioquiaMedellínColombia

Personalised recommendations