Advertisement

Journal of Financial Services Research

, Volume 34, Issue 1, pp 1–34 | Cite as

The Sensitivity of the Loss Given Default Rate to Systematic Risk: New Empirical Evidence on Bank Loans

  • Stefano Caselli
  • Stefano Gatti
  • Francesca Querci
Article

Abstract

We verify the existence of a relation between loss given default rate (LGDR) and macroeconomic conditions by examining 11,649 bank loans concerning the Italian market. Using both the univariate and multivariate analyses, we pinpoint diverse macroeconomic explanatory variables for LGDR on loans to households and SMEs. For households, LGDR is more sensitive to the default-to-loan ratio, the unemployment rate, and household consumption. For SMEs, LGDR is influenced by the total number of employed people and the GDP growth rate. These findings corroborate the Basel Committee’s provision that LGDR quantification process must identify distinct downturn conditions for each supervisory asset class.

Keywords

Loss given default rate Bank loans Systematic risk New Basel Capital Accord 

JEL Classification Numbers

G21 G28 

References

  1. Acharya Viral V, Bharath Sreedhar T, Srinivasan A (2007) Does industry-wide distress affect defaulted firms? Evidence from creditor recoveries. J Financ Econ 85(3):787–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altman E, Brady B (2002) Explaining aggregate recovery rates on corporate bond defaults. NYU Salomon Center Working Paper, January. Available at http://pages.stern.nyu.edu
  3. Altman E, Resti A, Sironi A (2002) The link between default and recovery rates: effects on the procyclicality of regulatory capital ratios. BIS Working Papers, July, issue 113. Available at http://www.bis.org
  4. Altman E, Brady B, Resti A, Sironi A (2005a) The link between default and recovery rates: theory empirical evidence and implications. Journal of Business 78(6):2203–2227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Altman E, Brady B, Resti A, Sironi A (2005b) The PD/LGD link: empirical evidence from the bond market. In: Altman E, Resti A, Sironi A (eds) Recovery risk. Riskbooks, London, pp 217–233Google Scholar
  6. Altman E, Resti A, Sironi A (2005c) The PD/LGD link: implications for credit risk modelling. In: Altman E Resti A Sironi A (ed) Recovery risk. Riskbooks, London, pp 253–266Google Scholar
  7. Asarnow E, Edwards D (1995) Measuring loss on defaulted bank loans. J Commer Lend 77(7):11–23Google Scholar
  8. Asarnow E, Marker J (1995) Historical performance of the U.S. corporate loan market: 1988–1993. Commer Lend Rev 10(2):13–32Google Scholar
  9. Banca d’Italia, Appendice Statistica alla Relazione Annuale, from 1991 to 2005Google Scholar
  10. Banca d’Italia, Bollettino Statistico vol I, from 1991 to 2005Google Scholar
  11. Banca d’Italia (2001) Questionario recupero crediti: principali risultati. Bollettino di Vigilanza, December, issue 12Google Scholar
  12. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2004a) International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards. A revised framework. June. Available at http://www.bis.org
  13. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2004b) Background note on LGD quantification. December. Available at http://www.bis.org
  14. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2005a) An explanatory note on the Basel II IRB risk weight functions. July. Available at http://www.bis.org
  15. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2005b) Guidance on paragraph 468 of the framework document. July. Available at http://www.bis.org
  16. Carey M, Gordy M (2004) Measuring systematic risk in recoveries on defaulted debt I: firm-level ultimate LGDs. Federal Reserve Board of Governors Working Papers, December. Available at http://www.fdic.gov
  17. Davydenko S, Franks J (2008) Do bankruptcy codes matter? A study of defaults in France Germany and the UK. J Finance 63:565–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dermine J, Neto de Carvalho C (2006) Bank loan losses-given-default: a case study. J Bank Financ 30(4):1219–1243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Düllmann K, Trapp M (2004) Systematic risk in recovery rates—an empirical analysis of US corporate credit exposures. Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper, issue 2. Available at http://www.bundesbank.de
  20. Düllmann K, Trapp M (2005) Systematic risk in recovery rates of US corporate credit exposures. In: Altman E, Resti A, Sironi A (eds) Recovery risk. Riskbooks, London, pp 235–252Google Scholar
  21. Frye J (2000) Depressing recoveries. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Working Paper, Emerging Issues Series, 1–17 October. Available at http://www.chicagofed.org
  22. Frye J (2003) A false sense of security. Risk 16(8):63–68Google Scholar
  23. Frye J (2005) The effects of systematic credit risk: a false sense of security. In: Altman E, Resti A, Sironi A (eds) Recovery risk. Riskbooks, London, pp 187–200Google Scholar
  24. Granata E (2003) Il valore strategico per le piccole e medie imprese della riforma della disciplina delle crisi aziendali—Il punto di vista del sistema bancario. Available at http:// www.euromedfinanza.it
  25. Gupton G, Gates D, Carty L (2000) Bank loan loss given default. Moody’s Investors Service Special Comment, 1–24 November. Available at http://www.moodyskmv.com
  26. ISTAT, Annuario Statistico, from 1990 to 2004Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefano Caselli
    • 1
  • Stefano Gatti
    • 1
  • Francesca Querci
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Financial Markets and Financial IntermediationBocconi UniversityMilanItaly
  2. 2.Department of Business AdministrationUniversity of GenovaGenovaItaly

Personalised recommendations