“Comparable Workers” and the Part-Time Workers Regulations
- 69 Downloads
The House of Lords majority decision in Matthews v. Kent and Medway Towns Fire Authority overturns the narrow interpretation given to key aspects of the Part-Time Workers (Protection of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations’ core comparator mechanism in the lower tribunals and the Court of Appeal. It is a contextually astute judgment, which recognises the reductionist implications of an overly narrow approach to establishing comparability for the purposes of a less favourable treatment claim on the grounds of part-time work. The positive aspect of this decision remains overshadowed, however, by the fact that this interpretation provides little consolation to the large majority of part-time women workers whose disadvantage and inequality remains outside the scope of the Regulations’ protection.
Keywordscomparators comparable full-time workers less favourable treatment part-time workers Part-Time Workers Regulations
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
I am grateful to Dimitra Nassimpian for casting a critical eye over this note. The usual disclaimer applies.
- Conaghan, J., “Time to Dream? Flexibility, Families, the Regulation of Working Time”, in Precarious Work, Women, and the New Economy eds. J. Fudge & R. Owens (Oxford: Hart, 2006), 101–129Google Scholar
- Department for Communities and Local Government, Government Action Plan – Implementing the Women and Work Commission Recommendations (London: HMSO, 2006)Google Scholar
- Jouhette, S. & Romans, F., EU Labour Force Survey: Principal Results 2005 (Eurostat, 2006)Google Scholar