Asia-Pacific Financial Markets

, Volume 15, Issue 3–4, pp 307–347 | Cite as

Recovery Process Model



Recently, because of Basel II and the subprime mortgage crisis, the quantification of the recovery size and the recovery rate for the debt of a defaulted company is a serious problem for financial institutions and their supervisors, but there has been no study of structure of the recovery process which is the relationship between time and the cumulative recovery size. Existent recovery models do not regard the recovery progress before the time of achievement of recovery. We directly model recovery process for the debt of a single defaulted company. We model the recovery process by a homogeneous compound Poisson process and extend our model to an inhomogeneous compound Poisson process. The interest rate is explicitly used in our model. By our model, the relationship between the cumulative recovery, the increment of recovery, the initial debt amount, the last recovery possible time and the interest rate can be analyzed. We derive the expected value and the variance of the survival value of the debt and the recovery rate, and also derive the probability distribution function and the expected value of the recovery completion time. Moreover we present the numerical methods for calculating the expected value and the variance based on Panjer recursion formula and the fast Fourier transformation, and show numerical results. Also we propose a new method of calculating the transition density of an inhomogeneous compound Poisson process. Our method is based on approximating an inhomogeneous compound Poisson process by a piecewise homogeneous compound Poisson process. This method is used to compute the expected value and the variance of an inhomogeneous compound Poisson process.


Recovery rate Loan Inhomogeneous compound Poisson process Credit risk BIS 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ahmed S.E., Saleh A.K.Md.E. (1999) Estimation of regression coefficients in an exponential regression model with censored observations. Journal of the Japan Statistical Society 29(1): 55–64Google Scholar
  2. Araten M., Jacobs M. Jr., Varshney P. (2004) Measuring LGD on commercial loans: An 18-year internal study. The RMA Journal 86(8): 96–103Google Scholar
  3. Asarnow E., Edwards D. (1995) Measuring loss on defaulted Bank loans: A 24-year study. The Journal of Commercial Lending 77(7): 11–23Google Scholar
  4. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2004). Basel II: International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards: A revised framework. Bank for International Settlements.Google Scholar
  5. Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chernobai A, Menn C., Trueck S., Rachev S. (2006) A note on the estimation of the frequency and severity distribution of operational losses. Mathematical Scientist 30(2): 87–97Google Scholar
  7. Čížek, P., Härdle, W., & Weron, R. (2005). Statistical tools for finance and insurance. Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Daley, D. J., & Vere-Jones, D. (2008). An introduction to the theory of point processes: General theory and structure (2nd ed., vol. 2). Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Dermine J., de Carvalho C.N. (2006) Bank loan losses-given-default: A case study. Journal of Banking & Finance 30: 1219–1243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Franks, J., de Servigny, A., & Davydenko, S. (2004). A comparative analysis of the recovery process and recovery rates for private companies in the UK, France and Germany. Technical Report, STANDARD & POORS RISK SOLUTIONS REPORT.Google Scholar
  11. Gerber H.U., Shiu E.S.W. (1998) On the time value of ruin. North American Actuarial Journal 2: 48–78Google Scholar
  12. Glasserman, P. (2004). Monte Carlo methods in financial engineering. Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Greene, W. H. (2007). Econometric analysis (6th ed.). Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Guo X., Jarrow R.A., Zeng Y. (2008) Modeling the recovery rate in a reduced form model. Mathematical Finance 19(1): 73–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hurt L., Felsovalyi A. (1998) Measuring loss on Latin American defaulted Bank loans: A 27-year study of 27 Countries. Journal of Lending & Credit Risk Management 80: 41–46Google Scholar
  16. Itoh, Y., & Yamashita, S. (2008). Empirical study of recovery rates of the loans for small company. FSA Research Review, 2007, 189–218 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  17. Jokivuolle E., Peura S. (2003) Incorporating collateral value uncertainty in loss given default estimates and loan-to-value ratios. European Financial Management 9(3): 271–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Klugman, S. A., Panjer, H. H., & Willmot, G. E. (2004). Loss models: From data to decisions. Wiley- Interscience.Google Scholar
  19. Lawless, J. F. (2003). Statistical models and methods for lifetime data (2nd ed.). Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Lindskog F., Mcneil A.J. (2003) Common poisson shock models: Applications to insurance and credit risk modelling. ASTIN Bulletin 33(2): 209–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Merton R.C. (1974) On the pricing of corporate debt: The risk structure of interest rates. Journal of Finance 29(2): 449–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mikosch, T. (2004). Non-life insurance mathematics: An introduction with stochastic processes. Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Panjer H.H. (1981) Recursive evaluation of a family of compound distributions. ASTIN Bulletin 12(1): 22–26Google Scholar
  24. Panjer, H. H. (2006). Operational risk: Modeling analytics. Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
  25. Panjer, H. H., & Willmot, G. E. (1992). Insurance risk models. Society of Actuaries.Google Scholar
  26. Rolski, T., Schmidli, H., Schmidt, V., & Teugels, J. (1999). Stochastic processes for insurance and finance. Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Taylor, H. M., & Karlin, S. (1998). An introduction to stochastic modeling (3rd ed.). Academic Press.Google Scholar
  28. Wu R., Wang G., Zhang C. (2005) On a joint distribution for the risk process with constant interest force. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 36(3): 365–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of EconomicsHitotsubashi UniversityKunitachi, TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations