The pointing system of the Herschel space observatory

Description, Calibration, Performance and improvements

Abstract

We present the activities carried out to calibrate and characterise the performance of the elements of attitude control and measurement on board the Herschel spacecraft. The main calibration parameters and the evolution of the indicators of the pointing performance are described, from the initial values derived from the observations carried out in the performance verification phase to those attained in the last year and half of mission, an absolute pointing error around or even below 1 arcsec, a spatial relative pointing error of some 1 arcsec and a pointing stability below 0.2 arsec. The actions carried out at the ground segment to improve the spacecraft pointing measurements are outlined. On-going and future developments towards a final refinement of the Herschel astrometry are also summarised. A brief description of the different components of the attitude control and measurement system (both in the space and in the ground segments) is also given for reference. We stress the importance of the cooperation between the different actors (scientists, flight dynamics and systems engineers, attitude control and measurement hardware designers, star-tracker manufacturers, etc.) to attain the final level of performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Notes

  1. 1.

    Quaternions are a single example of a more general class of hypercomplex numbers. By analogy with the complex numbers, a quaternion can also be written as a linear combination of a real and three imaginary components. It is easy to represent the concatenation of rotations in quaternion format, constituting a very convenient and compact means of representing S/C attitudes. It is outside the scope of this paper to give even an introduction to quaternions. A good introduction to this topic is given in [28].

  2. 2.

    The actual packet rate was 1 Hz but many ACMS parameters were super-commutated (four samples per packet).

  3. 3.

    Beware that APE is not the proper APE, that is defined in temporal terms. A justification for the use of this proxy is given in [26], where it is shown that it introduces an additional error of typically only 0.1 arcsec.

  4. 4.

    The PDE was not explicitly measured within PVP, but the long-stare pointing tests carried out indicated that the requirement was met, provided that the S/C was kept out of “warm” attitudes (see definition below).

  5. 5.

    Minor STR plate scale errors were present in the early phases of the mission. The result of the CCD reference temperature lowering was a substantial increase of the effect. The attitude measurements have been improved by applying corrections in the ground processing. See Table 10 and Section 5.1.

  6. 6.

    The term “cold” refers to those S/C attitudes that keep the service module away from heating by solar radiation, in contrast to “warm” attitudes. Originally, only those with SAA ≥ 110 were considered as problematic due to the risk of heating some components of the STR support structure.

  7. 7.

    A cycle is a series of ODs where all the instruments are used in sequence. Typically comprises 14 ODs.

  8. 8.

    As demonstrated by measurements derived from CCD dumps performed at the initial and final STR2 CCD reference temperature.

  9. 9.

    http://naif.jpl.nasa.gov/naif/about.html

  10. 10.

    http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/horizons.cgi

  11. 11.

    http://iau-comm4.jpl.nasa.gov/de405iom/de405iom.pdf

  12. 12.

    The STR is roughly pointing in the opposite direction to the telescope boresight.

References

  1. 1.

    Herschel/Planck ACMS Users’ Manual, H-P-4-DS-MA-001 (December 2006)

  2. 2.

    ASTR for Herschel/Planck User Manual, H-P-4-GAF-MA-0001, rev. 7 (October 2006)

  3. 3.

    Aussel, H.: Towards an accurate reconstruction of the Herschel pointing. Technical Report SAp-PACS-HA-0729-11, issue 1.0, CEA Saclay (November 2011)

  4. 4.

    Aussel, H.: PACS pointing jitter: the GYR view. Technical Report SAp-PACS-HA-0729-11, issue 1.0. CEA Saclay ((November 2011))

  5. 5.

    Aussel, H.: A first look into the STR catalog, CEA Saclay (27 July 2011)

  6. 6.

    Berrighi, G., Lorenzini, S.: Key Parameters for Herschel STR Catalogue Generation, Technical Note H-P-GAF-TN-0010, rev. 0 (4 February 2005)

  7. 7.

    De Grauuw, Th, et al.: The herschel-heterodyne instrument for the far-infrared (HIFI). A&A 518, L6 (2010)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Dungate, D.G.: Pointing Error Handbook, E S A, ESA-NCR-502 (Vol. 1), issue 1 (19 February1993)

  9. 9.

    Elfving, A., Rasmussen, I.: Herschel pointing accuracy and calibration procedures, SCI-PT-19552, rev. 1.3 (5 December 2003)

  10. 10.

    Feuchtgruber, H.: Herschel Guide stars – Assessment of Quality, PICC-ME-TN-040, rev. 1.0 (8 December 2011)

  11. 11.

    Feuchtgruber, H., Herschel, STR-A CCD: Sub-Pixel Structure, PICC-ME-TN-041, rev. 2.0 (26 March 2012)

  12. 12.

    Feuchtgruber, H.: Reconstruction of the Herschel Pointing Jitter, Technical Report PICC-ME-TN-042, rev. 1.0 (September 2012)

  13. 13.

    Griffin, M.J., et al.: The Herschel-SPIRE instrument and its in-flight performance. A&A 518, L3 (2010)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kessler, M.F., Mller, T.G., Leech, K., et al.: The ISO Handbook, Volume I: ISO – Mission & Satellite Overview, ESA SP-1262 (2003)

  15. 15.

    Klaas, U., et al.: PACS Performance Verification Phase Plan, PICC-MA-PL-001, Issue 2.0 (2010)

  16. 16.

    Lutz, D. et al.: PACS photometer PSF, PICC-ME-TN-033, rev. 2.0 (4 April 2012) Available at http://herschel.esac.esa.int/twiki/pub/Public/PacsCalibrationWeb/bolopsf_20.pdf.

  17. 17.

    Marston, A. P., Sánchez-Portal, M.: the Herschel Pointing Working Group, Herschel Pointing Calibration Plan, HERSCHEL-HSC-DOC-1139, rev. 1.1 (2 April 2009)

  18. 18.

    Müller, T., et al.: A&A 558, 97 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Nielbock, M., et al.: PACS pointing calibration sources, PICC-MA-TN-003, rev. 1.1 (10 April 2008)

  20. 20.

    Nielbock, M., Müller, T., Klaas, U., et al.: The Herschel PACS photometer calibration - A time dependent flux calibration for the PACS chopped point-source photometry AOT mode. Exp. Astron., 35 (2013)

  21. 21.

    Ott, S.: ASP Conference Series 434, 139 (2010)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Pilbratt, G.L., et al.: Herschel space observatory. A&A 518, L1 (2010)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Poglitsch, A., et al.: The photodetector array camera and spectrometer (PACS) on the herschel space observatory. A&A 518, L2 (2010)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Sánchez-Portal, M., Marston, A. P., the Herschel Pointing Working Group: Herschel Routine Phase Pointing Calibration Plan, HERSCHEL-HSC-DOC-1622, rev. 0.1 (12 February 2010)

  25. 25.

    Sánchez-Portal, M., et al.: Herschel Pointing Calibration Report, HERSCHEL-HSC-DOC-1515, rev. 1.0, (25 November 2009).// Available at http://herschel.esac.esa.int/twiki/pub/Public/SpacecraftObservatoryWeb/pointing_calibration_report_v10.pdf

  26. 26.

    Stephenson, C.A.: Calculation of the 68th percentile of the Absolute Pointing Error, HERSCHEL-HSC-TN-2059, Issue 1.0, (December 2013)

  27. 27.

    Tuttlebee, M.: Herschel/Planck Star Tracker Performance Assessment and Calibration, PT-CMOC-OPS-RP-6435-HSO-GF, Issue 1.0 (August 2013)

  28. 28.

    Wertz, J. R. (Ed.): Spacecraft Attitude Determination and Control, Kluwer Academic Publishers (1978)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the anonymous referee for his/her valuable comments and suggestions. The Herschel spacecraft was designed, built, tested, and launched under a contract to ESA managed by the Herschel/Planck Project team by an industrial consortium under the overall responsibility of the prime contractor Thales Alenia Space (Cannes), and including Astrium (Friedrichshafen) responsible for the payload module and for system testing at spacecraft level, Thales Alenia Space (Turin) responsible for the service module, and Astrium (Toulouse) responsible for the telescope, with in excess of a hundred subcontractors.

PACS has been developed by a consortium of institutes led by MPE (Germany) and including UVIE (Austria); KU Leuven, CSL, IMEC (Belgium); CEA, LAM (France); MPIA (Germany); INAF-IFSI/OAA/OAP/OAT, LENS, SISSA (Italy); IAC (Spain). This development has been supported by the funding agencies BMVIT (Austria), ESA-PRODEX (Belgium), CEA/CNES (France), DLR (Germany), ASI/INAF (Italy), and CICYT/MCYT (Spain).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel Sánchez-Portal.

Additional information

Herschel is an ESA space observatory with science instruments provided by European-led Principal Investigator consortia and with important participation from NASA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sánchez-Portal, M., Marston, A., Altieri, B. et al. The pointing system of the Herschel space observatory. Exp Astron 37, 453–479 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-014-9396-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Herschel space observatory
  • Spacecraft
  • Pointing
  • Alignment
  • Calibration
  • Performance