Experimental Economics

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 132–153 | Cite as

Cognitive bubbles

  • Ciril Bosch-Rosa
  • Thomas Meissner
  • Antoni Bosch-Domènech
Original Paper

Abstract

Smith et al. (Econometrica 56(5):1119, 1988) reported large bubbles and crashes in experimental asset markets, a result that has been replicated many times. Here we test whether the occurrence of bubbles depends on the experimental subjects’ cognitive sophistication. In a two-part experiment, we first run a battery of tests to assess the subjects’ cognitive sophistication and classify them into low or high levels. We then invite them separately to two asset market experiments populated only by subjects with either low or high cognitive sophistication. We observe classic bubble and crash patterns in markets populated by subjects with low levels of cognitive sophistication. Yet, no bubbles or crashes are observed with our sophisticated subjects, indicating that cognitive sophistication of the experimental market participants has a strong impact on price efficiency.

Keywords

Asset market experiment Bubbles Cognitive sophistication 

JEL Classification

C91 D12 D84 G11 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the helpful comments of Michael Greenacre, Frank Heinemann, Joaquim Silvestre, Stefan Palan, Luba Petersen and participants of the Berlin Behavioral Economics colloquium. They also thank Ernan Haruvy, Yaron Lahav, and Charles Noussair for their help with the experimental software, and Pablo Lopez-Aguilar for helping with its implementation. The first author acknowledges financial support by the German Science Foundation through CRC TRR 190. The first two authors acknowledge financial support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) through CRC 649 “Economic Risk”. The last author acknowledges the financial support from the Spanish Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte under research project ECO2011-25295. The first author would also like to thank the Small Grants Program of the International Foundation for Research in Experimental Economics and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) through CRC TRR 190 "Rationality and Competition" for financial support.

Supplementary material

10683_2017_9529_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (704 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (pdf 704 KB)

References

  1. Andersson, O., Tyran, J.-R., Wengström, E., & Holm, H. (2015). Risk aversion relates to cognitive ability: Preferences or noise? Journal of the European Economic Association, 14(5), 1129–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baghestanian, S., & Walker, T. B. (2015). Anchoring in experimental asset markets. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 116, 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caginalp, G., Porter, D., & Smith, V. (1998). Initial cash/asset ratio and asset prices: An experimental study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(2), 756–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caginalp, G., Porter, D., & Smith, V. L. (2000). Overreactions, momentum, liquidity, and price bubbles in laboratory and field asset markets. Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets, 1(1), 24–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheung, S. L., Hedegaard, M., & Palan, S. (2014). To see is to believe: Common expectations in experimental asset markets. European Economic Review, 66, 84–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Corgnet, B., Hernán-González, R., Kujal, P., & Porter, D. (2015). The effect of earned versus house money on price bubble formation in experimental asset markets. Review of Finance, 19(4), 1455–1488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Costa-Gomes, M. A., & Crawford, V. P. (2006). Cognition and behavior in two-person guessing games: An experimental study. The American Economic Review, 96(5), 1737–1768. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cueva, C., & Rustichini, A. (2015). Is financial instability male-driven? Gender and cognitive skills in experimental asset markets. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 119, 330–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2010). Are risk aversion and impatience related to cognitive ability? The American Economic Review, 100(3), 1238–1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dufwenberg, M., Lindqvist, T., & Moore, E. (2005). Bubbles and experience: An experiment. American Economic Review, 95(5), 1731–1737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eckel, C. C., & Füllbrunn, S. (2015). Thar SHE blows? Gender, competition, and bubbles in experimental asset markets. American Economic Review, 105(2), 906–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2), 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gneezy, U., Rustichini, A., & Vostroknutov, A. (2010). Experience and insight in the race game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 75(2), 144–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Greiner, B. (2015). Subject pool recruitment procedures: organizing experiments with ORSEE. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 1, 114–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Güth, W., Kocher, M., & Sutter, M. (2002). Experimental beauty contests with homogeneous and heterogeneous players and with interior and boundary equilibria. Economics Letters, 74(2), 219–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hanaki, N., Akiyama, E., Funaki, Y., & Ishikawa, R. (2015). Diversity in cognitive ability enlarges mispricing, mimeo. Google Scholar
  18. Haruvy, E., Lahav, Y., & Noussair, C. N. (2007). Traders’ expectations in asset markets: Experimental evidence. American Economic Review, 97(5), 1901–1920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haruvy, E., & Noussair, C. N. (2006). The effect of short selling on bubbles and crashes in experimental spot asset markets. The Journal of Finance, 61(3), 1119–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644–1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huber, J., & Kirchler, M. (2012). The impact of instructions and procedure on reducing confusion and bubbles in experimental asset markets. Experimental Economics, 15(1), 89–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hussam, R. N., Porter, D., & Smith, V. L. (2008). Thar she blows: Can bubbles be rekindled with experienced subjects? American Economic Review, 98(3), 924–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kirchler, M., Bonn, C., Huber, J., & Razen, M. (2015). The “inflow-effect”-Trader inflow and price efficiency. European Economic Review, 77, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kirchler, M., Huber, J., & Stöckl, T. (2012). Thar she bursts: Reducing confusion reduces bubbles. American Economic Review, 102(2), 865–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Knott, J. H. (2012). The president, congress, and the financial crisis: Ideology and moral hazard in economic governance. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 42(1), 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kocher, M. G., & Sutter, M. (2006). Time is money—Time pressure, incentives, and the quality of decision-making. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 61(3), 375–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Levitt, S. D., List, J. A., & Sadoff, S. E. (2011). Checkmate: Exploring backward induction among chess players. American Economic Review, 101(2), 975–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McCabe, K. A., & Smith, V. L. (2000). A comparison of naive and sophisticated subject behavior with game theoretic predictions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(7), 3777–3781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nagel, R. (1995). Unraveling in guessing games: An experimental study. American Economic Review, 85(5), 1313–1326.Google Scholar
  30. Noussair, C., Robin, S., & Ruffieux, B. (2001). Price bubbles in laboratory asset markets with constant fundamental values. Experimental Economics, 4(1), 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Noussair, C., & Tucker, S. (2006). Futures markets and bubble formation in experimental asset markets. Pacific Economic Review, 11(2), 167–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Noussair, C. N., Tucker, S. J., & Xu, Y. (2014). “A futures market reduces bubbles but allows greater profit for more sophisticated traders,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2490326. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.Google Scholar
  33. Oechssler, J., Roider, A., & Schmitz, P. W. (2009). Cognitive abilities and behavioral biases. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72(1), 147–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Palan, S. (2013). A review of bubbles and crashes in experimental asset markets. Journal of Economic Surveys, 27(3), 570–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Petersen, L., & Winn, A. (2014). Does money illusion matter? Comment. American Economic Review, 104(3), 1047–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Porter, D. P., & Smith, V. L. (1995). Futures contracting and dividend uncertainty in experimental asset markets. Journal of Business, 68(4), 509–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith, V. L., Boening, Mv, & Wellford, C. P. (2000). Dividend timing and behavior in laboratory asset markets. Economic Theory, 16(3), 567–583.Google Scholar
  38. Smith, V. L., Suchanek, G. L., & Williams, A. W. (1988). Bubbles, crashes, and endogenous expectations in experimental spot asset markets. Econometrica, 56(5), 1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stöckl, T., Huber, J., & Kirchler, M. (2010). Bubble measures in experimental asset markets. Experimental Economics, 13(3), 284–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stöckl, T., Huber, J., & Kirchler, M. (2014). Multi-period experimental asset markets with distinct fundamental value regimes. Experimental Economics, 18(2), 314–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Williams, A. W. (2008). Chapter 29 price bubbles in large financial asset markets. In C. R. Plott & V. L. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of experimental economics results (Vol. 1, pp. 242–246). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Economic Science Association 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ciril Bosch-Rosa
    • 1
    • 2
  • Thomas Meissner
    • 3
  • Antoni Bosch-Domènech
    • 4
  1. 1.Berlin University of TechnologyBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Colegio Universitario de Estudios FinancierosMadridSpain
  3. 3.Maastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Universitat Pompeu Fabra and Barcelona GSEBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations