Inequality aversion and the house money effect
- 598 Downloads
In this paper, we analyse if individual inequality aversion measured with simple experimental games depends on whether the monetary endowment in these games is either a windfall gain (“house money”) or a reward for a certain effort-related performance. We then examine whether the way of preference elicitation affects the explanatory power of inequality aversion in social dilemma situations. Our results indicate that individual inequality aversion measured by the model of Fehr and Schmidt (Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(3):817–868, 1999) is not generally robust to the way endowments emerge. The inequality aversion model has only low predictive power for individual behaviour. It performs best when the endowment is house money and relatively small.
KeywordsIndividual preferences Inequality aversion Experimental economics Prisoner’s dilemma House money
JEL ClassificationC91 C92 H41
The authors would like to thank two anonymous referees and the editor for very useful comments and suggestions. Financial support from the German Science Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.
- Brosig, J., Riechmann, T., & Weimann, J. (2007). Selfish in the end? An investigation of consistency and stability of individual behaviour. FEMM Working Paper No. 07005, University of Magdeburg. Google Scholar
- Dannenberg, A., Riechmann, T., Sturm, B., & Vogt, C. (2010), Stability and explanatory power of inequality aversion—an investigation of the house money effect. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 10-006, Mannheim. Google Scholar
- Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (2006). The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism—experimental evidence and new theories. In S.-C. Kolm & J. M. Ythier (Eds.), Handbook on the economics of giving, reciprocity and altruism (Vol. 1, pp. 615–691). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar
- Fischbacher, U., & Gächter, S. (2010). Social preferences, beliefs, and the dynamics of free riding in public goods experiments. The American Economic Review, American Economic Association, 100(1), 541–556. Google Scholar
- Greiner, B. (2003). An online recruitment system for economic experiments. In K. Kremer & V. Macho (Eds.), Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen 2003. GWDG Bericht 63 (pp. 79–93). Göttingen: Ges. für Wiss. Datenverarbeitung, 2004. Google Scholar
- Keeler, J., James, W., & Abdel-Ghany, M. (1985). The relative size of windfall income and the permanent income hypothesis. Journal of Business and Statistics, 3(3), 209–215. Google Scholar
- Reinstein, D., & Riener, G. (2009). House money effects on charitable giving: an experiment. Discussion paper. Google Scholar
- Teyssier, S. (2009). Inequity and risk aversion in sequential public good games. Working Paper 09-19, GATE, Écully. Google Scholar