Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 32, Issue 2–3, pp 127–139 | Cite as

Reproductive melanization may protect sperm from harmful solar radiation

  • Jennifer L. Delmore
  • Patricia L. R. Brennan
  • Teri J. OrrEmail author
Original Paper


Animal pigmentation is incredibly diverse, serving a variety of functions. However, the function of the pigmentation that surrounds the testes of some vertebrates is unknown. Why are the tissues surrounding the testes (scrotum, tunica vaginalis and/or tunica albuginea) melanized in some species but not others? We examined this question in bats, where there is extensive species-specific variation in the presence of darkly pigmented (melanized) tissues surrounding the male gonads, as well as diversity in their ecologies, mating systems, and physiologies. Using data from 136 species of bats, we found that melanin surrounding the testes and epididymis is associated with more exposed roosting sites (presumably with greater sun exposure- and UV radiation), and with the occurrence of long-term male sperm storage. These findings suggest that scrotal melanin may protect mature sperm from UV damage, and from oxidative damage in species with male sperm storage. We found no evidence of an association between group size or mating system with reproductive melanin, or that phylogeny explains the distribution of pigmentation. Although our study suggests that scrotal melanin may protect sperm, the mechanism remains unknown. We outline several avenues for future work on reproductive pigmentation aimed at investigating additional roles of reproductive melanization in male bats.


Melanin Reproductive pigments Roost Scrotal pigments Sperm storage UV radiation 



We thank Kate Doyle and the UMass Natural History Collection; Mariana Muñoz-Romo, John Cubit, Al Hicks and Jennifer Wen for photographs; M. Brock Fenton and Nancy Simmons for support in field endeavors, Tom Eiting, Theodore Garland, Jr., Anthony Ives, Diane Kelly, Chi-Yun Kuo, Casey Gilman, Rachael Juvinall, Jenna Okun, Christopher Delmore and Robert Timm for useful comments. We also wish to thank two anonymous reviewers for insightful comments. Material is based upon work supported by NSF Postdoctoral Research Fellowship in Biology to TJO under Grant No. (DBI-1202871).

Supplementary material

10682_2018_9932_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (30 kb)
Supplement 1 Data used in analyses. Roost exposure categorization is based on roosting type and thus both use the same citations. Pigment was assigned from Kermott and Timm or other sources (as referenced in supplementary table citations) and verified when possible by additional sources as present (1) or absent (0). In a few cases where species is in parentheses none was specified in the original source (genus level only). Finally, in one case our observations differed from those of Kermott and Timm (Saccopteryx bilineata) in which we noted reproductive melanization but Kermott and Timm did not. In this case we went with our personal observations in the lab and field. Given the diminutive size of this species as well as cryptic nature of the genitalia (males and females are difficult to discern even when males are reproductive) we believe this to present a unique case. (XLSX 30 kb)
10682_2018_9932_MOESM2_ESM.docx (29 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 28 kb)


  1. Becker LA (2000), UCCS. Accessed 20 March 2000
  2. Blomberg SP, Garland T Jr, Ives AR (2003) Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717–745CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowmaker JK (2008) Evolution of vertebrate visual pigments. Vision Res 48:2022–2041CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brenner M, Hearing VJ (2008) The protective role of melanin against UV damage in human skin. J Photochem Photobiol 84:539–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, vol 2. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Crichton EG (2000) Sperm storage and fertilization. In: Crichton EG, Krutzsch P (eds) Reproductive biology of bats. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 295–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dávalos LM (2010) Earth history and the evolution of Caribbean bats. In: Fleming TH, Racey PA (eds) Island bats: ecology, evolution, and conservation. University of Chicago, Chicago, pp 96–115Google Scholar
  8. Dechmann DKN, Safi K (2005) Studying communication in bats. Cogn Brain Behav 9:479–496Google Scholar
  9. Endler JA (1978) A predator’s view of animal color patterns. Evol Biol 11:319–364Google Scholar
  10. Endler JA (1991) Variation in the appearance of guppy color patterns to guppies and their predators under different visual conditions. Vision Res 31:587–608CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fenton MB (1992) Pelage patterns and crypsis in roosting bats: Taphazous mauritianus and Epomophorus species. Koedoe 35:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Galván I, Moller AP, Erritzoe J (2011) Testicular melanization has evolved in birds with high mtDNA mutation rates. J Evol Biol 24:988–998CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gartner GEA, Hicks JW, Manzani PR et al (2010) Phylogeny, ecology, and heart position in snakes. Physiol Biochem Zool 83:43–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gerald MS, McGuire MT (2007) Secondary sexual coloration and CSF 5-HIAA are correlated in vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus). J Med Primatol 36:348–354CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Grether GF, Hudon J, Endler JA (2001) Carotenoid scarcity, synthetic pteridine pigments and the evolution of sexual coloration in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268:1245–1253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guillette LJ Jr, Weigel J, Flater G (1983) Unilateral testicular pigmentation in the Mexican lizard Sceloporus variabilis. Copeia 1:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoekstra HE, Coyne JA (2007) The locus of evolution: evo devo and the genetics of adaptation. Evolution 61:995–1016CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoffmann FG, Baker RJ (2003) Comparative phylogeography of short-tailed bats (Carollia: Phyllostomidae). Mol Ecol 12:3403–3414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ives AR, Garland T Jr (2010) Phylogenetic logistic regression for binary dependent variables. Syst Biol 59:9–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Jablonski NG, Chaplin G (2013) Epidermal pigmentation in the human lineage is an adaptation to ultraviolet radiation. J Hum Evol 65(5):671–675CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones KE, Binninda-Emonds ORP, Gittleman JL (2005) Bats, clocks, and rocks: diversification patterns in Chiroptera. Evolution 59:2243–2255CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kamilar JM, Cooper N (2013) Phylogenetic signal in primate behaviour, ecology and life history. Philos Trans R Soc B 368(1618):20120341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kermott LH, Timm RM (1988) Scrotal melanins in bats (Chiroptera): description, distribution and function. J Zool 214:519–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kunz TH, Parsons S (eds) (1988) Ecological and behavioral methods for the study of bats, 1st edn. Smithsonian Institution Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  26. Kunz TH, Parsons S (eds) (2009) Ecological and behavioral methods for the study of bats, 2nd edn. Smithsonian Institution Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  27. Maddison WP, Maddison DR (2011) Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis, version 2.75. Accessed 4 Nov 2011
  28. McGraw KJ, Mackillop EA, Dale J et al (2002) Different colors reveal different information: how nutritional stress affects the expression of melanin- and structurally based ornamental plumage. J Exp Biol 205:3747–3755PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mehlis M, Frommen JG, Rahn AK et al (2012) Inbreeding in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.): effects on testis and sperm traits. Biol J Lin Soc 107:510–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Orr TJ, Brennan PLR (2015) Sperm storage: distinguishing selective processes and evaluating criteria. Trends Ecol Evol 30(5):261–272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Orr TJ, Zuk M (2013) Does delayed fertilization facilitate sperm competition in bats? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:1903–1913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Penacchio O, Cuthill IC, Lovell PG et al (2015) Orientation to the sun by animals and its interaction with crypsis. Funct Ecol 29:1165–1177CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Racey PA (1979) The prolonged storage and survival of spermatozoa in Chiroptera. J Reprod Fertil 56(1):391–402CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Racey PA (1988) Reproductive assessment in bats. In: Kunz TH (ed) Ecological and behavioral methods for the study of bats. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp 31–45Google Scholar
  35. Ramm SA, Schärer L (2014) The evolutionary ecology of testicular function: size isn’t everything. Biol Rev 89:874–888CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Reid F (1997) A field guide to the mammals of Central America and Southeast Mexico. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  37. Rick IP, Mehlis M, Eßer E, Bakker TC (2014) The influence of ambient ultraviolet light on sperm quality and sexual ornamentation in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Oecologia 174:393–402CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Rosenblum EB, Hoekstra HE, Nachman MW (2004) Adaptive reptile color variation and the evolution of the Mc1r gene. Evolution 58:1794–1808PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Santana SE, Dial TO, Eiting TP et al (2011) Roosting ecology and the evolution of pelage markings in bats. PLoS ONE 6:e25845. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Scott JN, Fritz HI (1979) Brief note nonpigmented tunica vaginalis testis in the Opossum. Ohio J Sci 79:79–80Google Scholar
  41. Stuart-Fox DM, Moussalli A, Johnston GR, Owens IP (2004) Evolution of color variation in dragon lizards: quantitative tests of the role of crypsis and local adaptation. Evolution 58:1549–1559CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Velando A, Torres R, Alonso-Alvarez C (2008) Avoiding bad genes: oxidatively damaged DNA in germ line and mate choice. BioEssays 30:1212–1219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilkinson GS, McCracken GF (2003) Bats and balls: sexual selection and sperm competition in the Chiroptera. In: Kunz TH, Fenton MB (eds) Bat ecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 128–155Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer L. Delmore
    • 1
  • Patricia L. R. Brennan
    • 2
  • Teri J. Orr
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesMount Holyoke CollegeSouth HadleyUSA
  3. 3.Department of BiologyUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations