Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 31, Issue 6, pp 847–864 | Cite as

Rapid morphological divergence in two closely related and co-occurring species over the last 50 years

  • Virginie MillienEmail author
  • Ronan Ledevin
  • Cédric Boué
  • Andrew Gonzalez
Original Paper


We studied morphological variation in two closely related and ecologically similar species of mice of the genus Peromyscus, the deer mouse (P. maniculatus) and white-footed mouse (P. leucopus), over the last 50 years in Southern Quebec. We found that contemporary populations of the two species are distinct in morphology and interpret this differentiation as a reflection of resource partitioning, a mechanism favouring their local coexistence. While there was no size trend, geographic or temporal, both species displayed a concomitant change in the shape of their skull over the last 50 years, although this change was much more apparent in the white-footed mouse. As a result, the two species diverged over time and became more distinct in their morphology. The observed changes in morphology are large given the short time scale. During this period, there was also a shift in abundance of the two species in Southern Quebec, consistent with the northern displacement of the range of the white-footed mouse in the last 15 years. Our study thus reports the changes in morphology of two co-occurring mammal species that were accompanied by changes in distribution and local abundance, potentially in response to rapid climate change.


Character displacement Morphometry Peromyscus Rodent Phenotypic variation Species segregation 



We are grateful to landowners and park managers, the staff at the Gault Nature Reserve, field-work assistants and the many graduate students who participated in specimen collection, A. Howell for his help with the Redpath Museum specimens, K. Khidas at the Canadian Museum of Nature, R. Smith who collected the data used in Fig. S2, A. Cardini, the editor and associate editor, and two anonymous reviewers for comments on a previous draft of this manuscript. This work was supported by a FQRNT Team Grant #147236 to VM and AG, NSERC Discovery Grants # 341918-2012 to VM and # 2014-05840 to AG, a Canada Research Chair Tier 1, a Liber Ero Chair and Killam Fellowship to AG, and support from the LabEx Sciences archéologiques de Bordeaux (#ANR-10-LABX-52) to RL.

Supplementary material

10682_2017_9917_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (139 kb)
Fig. S1 Position of the 20 landmarks digitized on the left ventral view of the skull. (1) Anterior extremity between both incisors in the premaxilla; (2) Antero-lateral extremity of left incisor alveolus; (3) Anterior extremity of left incisive foramen; (4) Anterior lateral extremity swelling of the rostrum corresponding to the premaxilla-maxilla suture; (5) Contact point between the maxillary arm and the rostrum; (6) Anterior extremity of the zygomatic arc; (7) Posterior extremity of anterior incisive foramen; (8) Anterior extremity of dental tooth row located on the left first upper molar; (9) Labial-side point inserted between left first and second upper molars; (10) Posterior foramen palatine; (11) Posterior extremity of dental tooth row; (12) Posterior extremity of palatine; (13) Anterior maximum point of curvature of the squamosal; (14) Foramen ovale; (15) Meeting point between the basiphenoid, basioccipital and tympanic bulla; (16) Mid-point of the basioccipital-basisphenoid suture; (17) Posterior tip of the external auditory meatus; (18) Mid-basioccipital point; (19) Anterior extremity of foramen magnum; (20) Internal flexion of the occipital condyle (PDF 138 kb)
10682_2017_9917_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (80 kb)
Fig. S2 Proportion of small mammal species collected for historical (1959, 1960 and 1966; 284 specimens total) and recent (2007 to 2013; 332 specimens) field surveys conducted at sites MSH, MR and MY in Southern Quebec. All specimens are housed at the Redpath Museum, McGill University. Although these collection surveys are not an accurate estimate of actual species abundance, these data clearly show a shift from communities dominated by the deer mouse, P. maniculatus (in dark orange), to communities dominated by the white-footed mouse, P. leucopus (in dark blue) (PDF 79 kb)
10682_2017_9917_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (58 kb)
Fig. S3 Mean monthly temperature from 1913 to 2016 at the Weather station of Drumondville (45.53 N, 72.29 W, Climate Identifier: 7022160). Temperature increased between 1913 and 2016 for all 12 months of the year (all P < 0.01). Source of data: Government of Canada, Environment and natural resources, (PDF 57 kb)
10682_2017_9917_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx (377 kb)
Table S1 This table contains all the specimen data: centroid size, PC shape axes and raw coordinates of the rotated configurations projected into tangent space, body mass (in gram) and head-and-body length (in mm). VM, QC and RM specimens are from the Redpath Museum, McGill University, and CMN specimens are from the Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa (XLSX 377 kb)
10682_2017_9917_MOESM5_ESM.xlsx (57 kb)
Table S2 Eigenvalue, percent variance explained and loadings of the first 11 PCA axes (XLSX 57 kb)


  1. Adams DC, Otárola-Castillo E (2013) Geomorph: an R package for the collection and analysis of geometric morphometric shape data. Methods Ecol Evol 4:393–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander JM, Diez JM, Levine JM (2015) Novel competitors shape species’ responses to climate change. Nature 525:515–518CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Alhajeri BH, Steppan SJ (2015) Association between climate and body size in rodents: a phylogenetic test of Bergmann’s rule. Mamm Biol 81:219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson CS, Cady AB, Meikle DB (2003) Effects of vegetation structure and edge habitat on the density and distribution of white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) in small and large forest patches. Can J Zool 81:897–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aquadro CF, Patton JC (1980) Salivary amylase variation in Peromyscus: use in species identification. J Mammal 61:703–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ashton KG, Tracy MC, Queiroz A (2000) Is Bergmann’s rule valid for mammals? Am Nat 156:390–415Google Scholar
  7. Austin GE, Rehfisch MM (2005) Shifting nonbreeding distributions of migratory fauna in relation to climatic change. Glob Change Biol 11:31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baker RH (1968) Habitats and distributions. In: King JA (ed) Biology of Peromyscus (Rodentia). The American Society of Mammalogists, Stillwater, pp 98–122Google Scholar
  9. Barun A, Simberloff D, Meiri S et al (2015) Possible character displacement of an introduced mongoose and native marten on Adriatic Islands, Croatia. J Biogeogr 42:2257–2269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B et al (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bengtsson J (1989) Interspecific competition increases local extinction rate in a metapopulation system. Nature 340:713–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blois JL, Zarnetske PL, Fitzpatrick MC et al (2013) Climate change and the past, present, and future of biotic interactions. Science 341:499–504CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bocedi G, Atkins KE, Liao J et al (2013) Effects of local adaptation and interspecific competition on species’ responses to climate change. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1297:83–97PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bookstein FL (1991) Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown WL, Wilson EO (1956) Character displacement. Syst Zool 5:49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Caumul R, Polly PD (2005) Phylogenetic and environmental components of morphological variation: skull, mandible, and molar shape in marmots (Marmota, Rodentia). Evolution 59:2460–2472CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen I-C, Hill JK, Ohlemüller R et al (2011) Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science 333:1024–1026CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Choate JR (1973) Identification and recent distribution of white-footed mice (Peromyscus) in New England. J Mammal 54:41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Choate JR, Dowler RC, Krause JE (1979) Mensural Discrimination between Peromyscus leucopus and P. maniculatus (Rodentia) in Kansas. Southwest Nat 24:249–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cox PG, Rayfield EJ, Fagan MJ et al (2012) Functional evolution of the feeding system in rodents. PLoS ONE 7(4):e36299CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Cramer MJ (2014) Seeds of doubt: feeding preferences of white-footed deer mice (Peromyscus leucopus noveboracensis) and woodland deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus gracilis) on maple (genus Acer) seeds. Can J Zool 92:771–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Davis MB, Shaw RG (2001) Range shifts and adaptive responses to Quaternary climate change. Science 292:673–679CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Davis MB, Shaw RG, Etterson JR (2005) Evolutionary responses to changing climate. Ecology 86:1704–1714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dayan T, Simberloff D (2005) Ecological and community-wide character displacement: the next generation. Ecol Lett 8:875–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Diffenbaugh NS, Field CB (2013) Changes in ecologically critical terrestrial climate conditions. Science 341:486–492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Dray S, Dufour A-B (2007) The ade4 package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. J Stat Softw 22:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Drickamer LC (1972) Experience and selection behavior in the food habits of Peromyscus: use of olfaction. Behaviour 41:269–287CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Eiserhardt WL, Borchsenius F, Plum CM et al (2015) Climate-driven extinctions shape the phylogenetic structure of temperate tree floras. Ecol Lett 18:263–272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Fiset J, Tessier N, Millien V et al (2015) Phylogeographic structure of the white-footed mouse and the deer mouse, two Lyme disease reservoir hosts in Quebec. PLoS ONE 10:e0144112CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Gaitan J, Millien V (2016) The effect of stress level and parasite load on movement pattern in a small mammal reservoir host for Lyme disease. Can J Zool 94:565–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gardner JL, Peters A, Kearney M et al (2011) Declining body size: a third universal response to warming? Trends Ecol Evol 26:285–291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Gienapp P, Teplitsky C, Alho JS et al (2008) Climate change and evolution: disentangling environmental and genetic responses. Mol Ecol 17:167–178CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Gingerich PD (1993) Quantification and comparison of evolutionary rates. Am J Sci 293A:453–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grant PR (1976) An 11-year study of small mammal populations at Mont St. Hilaire, Quebec. Can J Zool 54:2156–2173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grant PR, Grant BR (2006) Evolution of character displacement in Darwin’s Finches. Science 313:224–226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Graves S, Maldonado J, Wolff JO (1988) Use of ground and arboreal microhabitats by Peromyscus leucopus and Peromyscus maniculatus. Can J Zool 66:277–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Haldane JBS (1949) Suggestions as to quantitative measurement of rates of evolution. Evolution 3:51–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Hamilton WJ Jr (1941) The food of small forest mammals in eastern United States. J Mammal 22:250–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hedrick PW (2013) Adaptive introgression in animals: examples and comparison to new mutation and standing variation as sources of adaptive variation. Mol Ecol 22:4606–4618CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Herrel A, Huyghe K, Vanhooydonck B et al (2008) Rapid large-scale evolutionary divergence in morphology and performance associated with exploitation of a different dietary resource. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:4792–4795CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Hibbard CW (1968) Paleontology. In: King JA (ed) Biology of Peromyscus (Rodentia). The American Society of Mammalogists, Stillwater, pp 6–26Google Scholar
  42. Holmes MW, Boykins GK, Bowie RC, Lacey EA (2016) Cranial morphological variation in Peromyscus maniculatus over nearly a century of environmental change in three areas of California. J Morphol 277:96–106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Holt RD (1990) The microevolutionary consequences of climate change. Trends Ecol Evol 5:311–315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Hughes L (2000) Biological consequences of global warming: is the signal already apparent? Trends Ecol Evol 15:56–61CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. James FC (1970) Geographic size variation in birds and its relationship to climate. Ecology 51:365–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Johansson J (2008) Evolutionary responses to environmental changes: how does competition affect adaptation? Evolution 62:421–435CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Kamler JF, Pennock DS, Welch C et al (1998) Variation in morphological characteristics of the white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus) and the deer mouse (P. maniculatus) under allotopic and syntopic conditions. Am Midl Nat 140:170–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Landry P, Lapointe F-J (2001) Within-population craniometric variability of insular populations of deer mice, Peromyscus maniculatus, elucidated by landscape configuration. Oikos 95:136–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ledevin R, Michaux JR, DeFontaine V, Henttonen H, Renaud S (2010) Evolutionary history of the banl vole Myodes glareolus: a morphometric perspective. Biol J Linn Soc 100:681–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ledevin R, Millien V (2013) Congruent morphological and genetic differentiation as a signature of range expansion in a fragmented landscape. Ecol Evol 3:4172–4182CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Ledevin R, Quéré J-P, Michaux JR et al (2012) Can tooth differentiation help to understand species coexistence? The case of wood mice in China. J Zool Syst Evol Res 50:315–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Leibold MA, McPeek MA (2006) Coexistence of the niche and neutral perspectives in community ecology. Ecology 87:1399–1410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Leo ST, Millien V (2016) Microsatellite markers reveal low frequency of natural hybridization between the white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus) and deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) in southern Quebec, Canada. Genome 60:454–463CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Logan T, Charron I, Chaumont D, Houle D (2011) Atlas of climate scenarios for Québec forests. Techical Report ISBN 978-2- 923292-11-3. Produced by Ouranos for Ministère des Ressources naturelles and de la Faune du Québec, pp 1–132Google Scholar
  55. Long CA (1996) Ecological replacement of the deer mouse, Peromyscus maniculatus, by the white-footed mouse, P. leucopus, in the Great Lakes Region. Can Field Nat 110:271–277Google Scholar
  56. MacArthur R, Levins R (1964) Competition, habitat selection, and character displacement in a patchy environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci 51:1207–1210CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Marrotte R, Gonzalez A, Millien V (2014) Landscape resistance and habitat combine to provide an optimal model of genetic structure and connectivity at the range margin of a small mammal. Mol Ecol 23:3983–3998CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Martin PR, Martin TE (2001) Ecological and fitness consequences of species coexistence: a removal experiment with wood warblers. Ecology 82:189–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Meiri S, Dayan T (2003) On the validity of Bergmann’s rule. J Biogeogr 30:331–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Millar JS (1989) Reproduction and development. In: King JA (ed) Biology of Peromyscus (Rodentia). The American Society of Mammalogists, Stillwater, pp 169–232Google Scholar
  61. Millien V (2006) Morphological evolution is accelerated among island mammals. PLoS Biol 4:e321CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Millien V, Lyons SK, Olson L et al (2006) Ecotypic variation in the context of global climate change: revisiting the rules. Ecol Lett 9:853–869CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Myers P, Lundrigan BL, Gillespie BW, Zelditch ML (1996) Phenotypic plasticity in skull and dental morphology in the prairie deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii). J Morphol 229:229–237CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Myers P, Lundrigan BL, Hoffman SMG et al (2009) Climate-induced changes in the small mammal communities of the Northern Great Lakes region. Glob Change Biol 15:1434–1454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ouranos (2015) Vers l’adaptation. Synthèse des connaissances sur les changements climatiques au Québec, MontréalGoogle Scholar
  66. Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:637–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pelletier F, Garant D, Hendry AP (2009) Eco-evolutionary dynamics. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 364:1483–1489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pergams ORW, Ashley MV (1999) Rapid morphological change in island deer mice. Evolution 53:1573–1581CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Pergams ORW, Lacy RC (2008) Rapid morphological and genetic change in Chicago-area Peromyscus. Mol Ecol 17:450–463CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Pergams ORW, Lawler JJ (2009) Recent and widespread rapid morphological change in rodents. PLoS ONE 4:e6452CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Pergams ORW, Nyberg D (2001) Museum collections of mammals corroborate the exceptional decline of prairie habitat in the Chicago region. J Mammal 82:984–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team (2014) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-117. Available from Accessed July 2017
  73. R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  74. Reed AW, Kennedy PK, Beck ML et al (2004) Using morphologic characters to identify Peromyscus in sympatry. Am Midl Nat 152:190–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rich SM, Kilpatrick W, Shippee JL et al (1996) Morphological differentiation and identification of Peromyscus leucopus and P. maniculatus in Northeastern North America. J Mammal 77:985–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rogic A, Tessier N, Legendre P et al (2013) Genetic structure of the white-footed mouse in the context of the emergence of Lyme disease in southern Québec. Ecol Evol 3:2075–2088CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. Rohlf FJ, Slice D (1990) Extensions of the procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst Zool 39:40–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Roy-Dufresne E, Logan T, Chmura G et al (2013) Poleward expansion of the white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus) under climate change and implications for the spread of Lyme disease. PLoS ONE 8:e80724CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. Schlager S (2015) Morpho: calculations and visualizations related to Geometric Morphometrics. R package version 2.3.0. Available from Accessed July 2017
  80. Seifert VA, Clarke BL, Crossland JP et al (2016) A method to distinguish morphologically similar Peromyscus species using extracellular RNA and high-resolution melt analysis. Anal Biochem 508:65–72CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Simberloff D, Dayan T, Jones C et al (2000) Character displacement and release in the small Indian mongoose, Herpestes javanicus. Ecology 81:2086–2099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Slatkin M (1980) Ecological character displacement. Ecology 61:163–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ (2012) Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling, 2nd edn. Sage Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  84. Souto-Lima R, Millien V (2014) The influence of environmental factors on the morphology of red-backed voles Myodes gapperi (Rodentia, Arvicolinae) in Quebec and Western Labrador. Biol J Linn Soc 112:204–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Stuart YE, Losos JB (2013) Ecological character displacement: Glass half full or half empty? Trends Ecol Evol 28:402–408CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Stuart YE, Campbell TS, Hohenlohe PA et al (2014) Rapid evolution of a native species following invasion by a congener. Science 346:463–466CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Teplitsky C, Millien V (2013) Climate warming and Bergmann’s rule through time: is there any evidence? Evol Appl 7:156–168CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  88. Tessier N, Noel S, Lapointe F-J (2004) A new method to discriminate the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) from the white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus) using species-specific primers in multiplex PCR. Can J Zool 82:1832–1835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Theurillat J, Guisan A (2001) Potential impact of climate change on vegetation in the european Alps: a review. Clim Change 50:77–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Thompson TG, Conley W (1983) Discrimination of coexisting species of Peromyscus in South-Central New Mexico. Southwest. Nat 28:199–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Tobias JA, Cornwallis CK, Derryberry EP et al (2013) Species coexistence and the dynamics of phenotypic evolution in adaptive radiation. Nature 506:359–363CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. VanValkenburgh B, Theodor J, Friscia A et al (2004) Respiratory turbinates of canids and felids: a quantitative comparison. J Zool 264:281–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Walsh RE, Aprigio Assis AP, Patton JL, Marroig G, Dawson TE, Lacey EA (2016) Morphological and dietary responses of chipmunks to a century of climate change. Glob Change Biol 22:3233–3253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Walther G, Post E, Convey P et al (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416:389–395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Wolf M, Friggens M, Salazar-Bravo J (2009) Does weather shape rodents? Climate related changes in morphology of two heteromyid species. Naturwissenschaften 96:93–101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Wolff JO (1985) The effects of density, food, and interspecific interference on home range size in Peromyscus leucopus and Peromyscus maniculatus. Can J Zool 63:2657–2662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wolff JO, Freeberg MH, Dueser RD (1983) Interspecific territoriality in two sympatric species of Peromyscus (Rodentia: Cricetidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12:237–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wolff JO, Dueser RD, Berry KS et al (1985) Food habits of sympatric Peromyscus leucopus and Peromyscus maniculatus. J Mammal 66:795–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Yom-Tov Y, Geffen E (2006) Geographic variation in body size: the effects of ambient temperature and precipitation. Oecologia 148:213–218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Redpath MuseumMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.UMR5199 PACEAUniversité de BordeauxPessacFrance
  3. 3.Department of BiologyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations