Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 573–590 | Cite as

Structural blueprint and ontogeny determine the adaptive value of the plastic response to competition in clonal plants: a modelling approach

  • A.-K. Bittebiere
  • M. Garbey
  • M. Smaoui-Feki
  • B. Clément
  • C. Mony
Original Paper


Local competitive interactions strongly influence plant community dynamics. To maintain their performance under competition, clonal plants may plastically modify their network architecture to grow in the direction of least interference. The adaptive value of this plastic avoidance response may depend, however, on traits linked with the plant’s structural blueprint and ontogeny. We tested this hypothesis using virtual populations. We used an Individual Based Model to simulate competitive interactions among clones within a plant population. Clonal growth was studied under three competition intensities in plastic and non-plastic individuals. Plasticity buffered the negative impacts of competition at intermediate densities of competitors by promoting clone clumping. Success despite competition was promoted by traits linked with (1) the plant’s structural blueprint (weak apical dominance and sympodial growth) and (2) ontogenetic processes, with an increasing or a decreasing dependence of the elongation process on the branch generation level or length along the competition intensity gradient respectively. The adaptive value of the plastic avoidance response depended on the same traits. This response only modulated their importance for clone success. Our results show that structural blueprint and ontogeny can be primary filters of plasticity and can have strong implications for evolutionary ecology, as they may explain why clonal plants have developed many species-specific plastic avoidance behaviours.


Adaptive value Competition intensity Ontogeny Plasticity Structural blueprint 



This project benefited from the grant ANR-08-SYSC-012 provided by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (France). We thank the volunteers worldwide that contributed to the calculations.


  1. Alpert P, Simms EL (2002) The relative advantages of plasticity and fixity in different environments: when is it good for a plant to adjust? Evol Ecol 16:285–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson DP (2004) BOINC: a system for public-resource computing and storage. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Grid Computing. Pittsburgh, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  3. Begon M, Harper JL, Townsend CR (1996) Ecology. Blackwell Science, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell AD (1984) Dynamic morphology: a contribution to plant population ecology. In: Dirzo R, Sarukh′an J (eds) Perspectives in plant population ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland, pp 48–65Google Scholar
  5. Benot ML, Mony C, Puijalon S et al (2008) Responses of clonal architecture to experimental defoliation: a comparative study between ten grassland species. Plant Ecol 201:257–266Google Scholar
  6. Birch CPD, Oom SP, Beecham JA (2007) Rectangular and hexagonal grids used for observation, experiment and simulation in ecology. Ecol Model 206:347–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bittebiere AK, Mony C, Clément B et al (2012a) Modeling competition between plants using an individual based model: methods and effects on the growth of two species with contrasted growth forms. Ecol Model 234:38–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bittebiere AK, Renaud N, Clément B et al (2012b) Morphological response to competition for light in the clonal Trifolium repens (Fabaceae). Am J Bot 99:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bolker BM, Pacala S, Neuhauser C (2003) Spatial dynamics in model plant communities: What do we really know? Am Nat 162:135–148Google Scholar
  10. Bradshaw AD (1965) Evolutionary significance of plasticity in plants. Adv Genet 13:115–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cain ML (1994) Consequences of foraging in clonal plant species. Ecology 75:933–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheplick GP (1997) Responses to severe competitive stress in a clonal plant: differences between genotypes. Oikos 79:581–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheplick GP, Gutierrez CM (2000) Clonal growth and storage in relation to competition in genets of the rhizomatous perennial Amphibromus scabrivalvis. Can J Bot 78:537–546Google Scholar
  14. de Kroon H, Stuefer JF, Dong M et al (1994) On plastic and non-plastic variation in clonal plant morphology and its ecological significance. Folia Geobot 29:123–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Geber MA, Watson MA, Furnish R (1992) Genetic differences in the clonal demography in Eichhornia crassipes. J Ecol 80:329–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gibson DJ, Connolly J, Hartnett DC et al (1999) Designs for greenhouse studies of interactions between plants. J Ecol 87:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldberg DE (1987) Neighborhood competition in an old-field plant community. Ecology 68:1211–1223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grime JP (2001) Plant strategies, vegetation processes, and ecosystem properties. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  19. Herben T (2004) Physiological integration affects growth form and competitive ability in clonal plants. Evol Ecol 18:493–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Herben T, Novoplansky A (2010) Fight or flight: plastic behavior under self-generated heterogeneity. Evol Ecol 24:1521–1536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huber H, Lukács S, Watson MA (1999) Spatial structure of stoloniferous herbs: an interplay between structural blue-print, ontogeny and phenotypic plasticity. Plant Ecol 141:107–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Humphrey LD, Pike DA (1998) Demographic and growth responses of a guerrilla and a phalanx perennial grass in competitive mixtures. J Ecol 86:854–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lovett-Doust L (1981) Population dynamics and local specialization in a clonal perennial (Ranunculus repens). I. The dynamics of ramets in contrasting habitats. J Ecol 69:743–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marcuvitz S, Turkington R (2000) Differential effects of light quality, provided by different grass neighbours, on the growth and morphology of Trifolium repens L. (white clover). Oecologia 125:293–300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mony C, Garbey M, Smaoui M et al (2011) Large scale parameter study of an individual-based model of clonal plant with volunteer computing. Ecol Model 222:935–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Novoplansky A (2009) Picking battles wisely: plant behaviour under competition. Plant, Cell Environ 32:726–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Novoplansky A, Cohen D, Sachs T (1990) How Portulaca seedlings avoid their neighbors. Oecologia 82:490–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oborny B (1994) Growth rules in clonal plants and environmental predictability—a simulation study. J Ecol 82:341–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oborny B, Mony C, Herben T (2012) From virtual plants to real communities: a review of modelling clonal growth. Ecol Model 234:3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rees M, Grubb PJ, Kelly D (1996) Quantifying the impact of competition and spatial heterogeneity on the structure and dynamics of a four-species guild of winter annuals. Am Nat 147:1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Richards MLA, Aitkenhead MJ, McDonald AJS (2010) Improving the effectiveness of angular dispersion in plant neighbourhood models. Ecol Model 221:1649–1654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ross MA, Harper JL (1972) Occupation of biological space during seedling establishment. J Ecol 60:77–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sampaio MC, Araújo TF, Scarano FR et al (2004) Directional growth of a clonal bromeliad species in response to spatial habitat heterogeneity. Evol Ecol 18:429–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schlichting CD (1986) The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 17:667–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schmid B (1986) Spatial dynamics and integration within clones of grassland perennials with different growth form. Proc R Soc B 228:173–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schmid B, Harper JL (1985) Clonal growth in grassland perennials: I. Density and pattern-dependent competition between plants with different growth forms. J Ecol 73:793–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smaoui-Feki, M., Nguyen, V. H. & Garbey, M. (2009) Parallel genetic algorithm implementation for BOINC. In: Proceedings of the international conference on parallel computing. LyonGoogle Scholar
  38. Stoll P, Prati D (2001) Intraspecific aggregation alter competitive interactions in experimental plant communities. Ecology 82:319–327Google Scholar
  39. Sultan SE (1995) Phenotypic plasticity and plant adaptation. Acta Bot Neerland 44:363–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. van Groenendael JM, Klimeš L, Klimešová J et al (1996) Comparative ecology of clonal plants. Philos T R Soc B 351:1331–1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. van Kleunen M, Stuefer JF (1999) Quantifying the effects of reciprocal assimilate and water translocation in a clonal plant by the use of steam-girdling. Oikos 85:135–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. van Kleunen M, Fischer M, Schmid B (2000) Clonal integration in Ranunculus reptans: by-product or adaptation? J Evol Biol 13:237–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Warren J, Wilson F, Diaz A (2002) Competitive relationships in a fertile grassland community—does size matter? Oecologia 132:125–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weigelt A, Jolliffe P (2003) Indices of plant competition. J Ecol 91:707–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Weijschedé J, Berentsen R, de Kroon H et al (2008) Variation in petiole and internode length affects plant performance in Trifolium repens under opposing selection regimes. Evol Ecol 22:383–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wildová R, Gough L, Herben T et al (2007) Architectural and growth traits differ in effects on performance of clonal plants: an analysis using a field-parameterized simulation model. Oikos 116:836–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilson M (2007) Measuring the components of competition along productivity gradients. J Ecol 95:301–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Winkler E, Schmid B (1995) Clonal strategies of herbaceous plant species: a simulation study on population growth and competition. Abs Bot 19:17–28Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • A.-K. Bittebiere
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. Garbey
    • 3
  • M. Smaoui-Feki
    • 3
  • B. Clément
    • 1
  • C. Mony
    • 1
  1. 1.UMR 6553 EcobioUniversité de Rennes 1Rennes CedexFrance
  2. 2.Université de Lyon, UMR 5023 LEHNAUniversité Lyon 1, CNRS, ENTPEVilleurbanneFrance
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of HoustonHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations