Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 1217–1233 | Cite as

Temperature- and density-dependence of diapause induction and its life history correlates in the geometrid moth Chiasmia clathrata (Lepidoptera: Geometridae)

  • Panu Välimäki
  • Sami M. Kivelä
  • Maarit I. Mäenpää
Original Paper


The relative roles of genetics and developmental plasticity in creating phenotypes adapted to prevailing conditions are insufficiently understood. In potentially multivoltine temperate insects, individuals that do not enter diapause but develop directly into reproductive adults within the same season are severely time-constrained. Direct development is, however, under selection only if expressed in the wild. Thus, adaptive correlates of the direct development are expected to evolve and persist only in multivoltine populations. We studied the genetic and phenotypic components of variation in juvenile development in the geometrid moth Chiasmia clathrata from univoltine and bivoltine regions. Larvae were reared at two temperatures (14/20 °C) and densities (low/high) in a factorial split-brood experiment. High temperature and low density promoted direct development, the former condition being associated with a short development time, high growth rate and large body size. Genotypes of bivoltine origin had a higher propensity for direct development and seemingly expressed an exaggerated plastic response to increasing temperature compared to the ones from univoltine populations. Alternative life history phenotypes associated with the induced developmental pathway emerged only in the bivoltine region, direct development resulting in a short larval period, high growth rate and small size at 20 °C there. The degree of differentiation between the developmental pathways was insensitive to larval density; high density only decreased both development time and body size to a certain degree. We conclude that the differences between the pathways are not due to the induction of a particular pathway itself, but geographically varying selection pressures shape the correlation structure among life history traits and their pathway-specific expression.


Developmental pathway Geographic variation Insects Phenotypic plasticity Thermal reaction norms 



We thank Matthew Symonds and three anonymous referees for useful comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript. This study was financed by Ella och Georg Ehrnrooths Stiftelse (grants to P.V. and S.M.K.), Finnish Cultural Foundation (P.V.) as well as Jenny and Antti Wihuri foundation (S.M.K.). All Finland’s guidelines and legal requirements for the use of animals in research were followed.

Supplementary material

10682_2013_9657_MOESM1_ESM.doc (634 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 635 kb)


  1. Aalberg Haugen IM, Berger D, Gotthard K (2012) The evolution of alternative developmental pathways: footprints of selection on life-history traits in a butterfly. J Evol Biol 25:1377–1388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agnew P, Hide M, Sidobre C, Michalakis Y (2002) A minimalist approach to the effects of density-dependent competition on insect lifehistory traits. Ecol Entomol 27:396–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angilletta MJ Jr (2009) Thermal adaptation, a theoretical and empirical synthesis. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson D, Sibly RM (1997) Why are organisms usually bigger in colder environments? Making sense of a life history puzzle. Trends Ecol Evol 12:235–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baayen RH (2011) languageR: data sets and functions with “analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics”. R Package, version 1.4. Available at
  6. Baayen RH, Davidson DJ, Bates DM (2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J Mem Lang 59:390–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bates D, Maechler M (2010) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R Package, version 0.999375-37. Available at:
  8. Blanckenhorn WU (1994) Fitness consequences of alternative life histories in water striders, Aquarius remigis (Heteroptera: Gerridae). Oecologia 97:354–365Google Scholar
  9. Blanckenhorn WU, Demont M (2004) Bergmann and converse Bergmann latitudinal clines in arthropods: two ends of a continuum? Integr Comp Biol 44:413–424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blanckenhorn WU, Fairbairn DJ (1995) Life history adaptation along a latitudinal cline in the water strider Aquarius remigis (Heteroptera: Gerridae). J Evol Biol 8:21–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Danks HV (1987) Insect dormancy: an ecological perspective. Biological Survey of Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  12. Davidowitz G, Nijhout HF (2004) The physiological basis of reaction norms: the interaction among growth rate, the duration of growth and body size. Integr Comp Biol 44:443–449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeWitt TJ, Sih A, Wilson DS (1998) Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity. Trends Ecol Evol 13:77–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diamond SE, Kingsolver JG (2010) Environmental dependence of thermal reaction norms: host plant quality can reverse the temperature-size rule. Am Nat 175:1–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fantinou AA, Tsitsipis JA (1999) Effect of larval density on development and diapause of Sesamia nonagrioides (Lef.) (Lep., Noctuidae) under laboratory conditions. J Appl Entomol 123:187–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Friberg M, Dahlerus J, Wiklund C (2012) Strategic larval decision-making in a bivoltine butterfly. Oecologia 169:623–635PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gomi T (1997) Geographic variation in critical photoperiod for diapause induction and its temperature dependence in Hyphantria cunea Drury (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). Oecologia 111:160–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gotthard K, Berger D (2010) The diapause decision as a cascade switch for adaptive developmental plasticity in body mass in a butterfly. J Evol Biol 23:1129–1137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hadfield J (2012) MCMCglmm: MCMC generalised linear mixed models. R Package, version 2.17. Available at
  20. Hanski I (1988) Four kinds of extra long diapause in insects: a review of theory and observations. Ann Zool Fenn 25:37–53Google Scholar
  21. Honěk A (1993) Intraspecific variation in body size and fecundity in insects: a general relationship. Oikos 66:483–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ishihara M (1999) Adaptive phenotypic plasticity and its difference between univoltine and multivoltine populations in a bruchid beetle, Kytorhinus sharpianus. Evolution 53:1979–1986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Karlsson B, Johansson A (2008) Seasonal polyphenism and developmental trade-offs between flight ability and egg laying in a pierid butterfly. Proc R Soc Lond B 275:2131–2136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Karlsson B, Stjernholm F, Wiklund C (2008) Test of a developmental trade-off in a polyphenic butterfly: direct development favours reproductive output. Funct Ecol 22:121–126Google Scholar
  25. Kivelä SM, Välimäki P (2008) Competition between larvae in a butterfly, Pieris napi, and maintenance of different life history strategies. J Anim Ecol 77:529–539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kivelä SM, Välimäki P, Carrasco D, Mäenpää MI, Oksanen J (2011) Latitudinal insect body size clines revisited: a critical evaluation of the saw-tooth model. J Anim Ecol 80:1184–1195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kivelä SM, Välimäki P, Mäenpää MI (2012) Genetic and phenotypic variation in juvenile development in relation to temperature and developmental pathway in a geometrid moth. J Evol Biol 25:881–891PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Larsdotter Mellström H, Friberg M, Borg-Karlsson A-K, Murtazina R, Palm M, Wiklund C (2010) Seasonal polyphenism in life history traits: time costs of direct development in a butterfly. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:1377–1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Messina FJ (1991) Life-history variation in a seed beetle: adult egg-laying vs. larval competitive ability. Oecologia 85:447–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moran NA (1992) The evolutionary maintenance of alternative phenotypes. Am Nat 139:971–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mousseau TA, Roff DA (1989) Adaptation to seasonality in a cricket: patterns of phenotypic and genotypic variation in body size and diapause expression along a cline in season length. Evolution 43:1483–1496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nijhout HF, Roff DA, Davidowitz G (2010) Conflicting processes in the evolution of body size and development time. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 365:567–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nylin S (1992) Seasonal plasticity in life history traits: growth and development in Polygonia c-album (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Biol J Linn Soc 47:301–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nylin S, Wickman P-O, Wiklund C (1989) Seasonal plasticity in growth and development of the speckled wood butterfly, Pararge aegeria (Satyrinae). Biol J Linn Soc 38:155–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pöykkö H, Hyvärinen M (2012) To grow fast or to grow big? Time-limited larvae of Eilema depressum speed up their growth and reduce the number of instars. Entomol Exp Appl 142:145–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pöykkö H, Tammaru T (2010) Countergradient vs. cogradient variation in growth and diapause in a lichen-feeding moth, Eilema depressum (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). J Evol Biol 23:1278–1285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Version 2.15.1. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at:
  38. Roff DA (1980) Optimizing development time in a seasonal environment: the ‘ups and downs’ of clinal variation. Oecologia 45:202–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Roff DA (2002) Life history evolution. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  40. Sauer KP, Spieth H, Grüner C (1986) Adaptive significance of genetic variability of photoperiodism in Mecoptera and Lepidoptera. In: Taylor F, Karvan R (eds) The evolution of insect life cycles. Springer, Berlin, pp 153–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scoble MJ (1992) The Lepidoptera—form, function and diversity. Oxford University Press, NYGoogle Scholar
  42. Sibly RM, Winokur L, Smith RH (1997) Interpopulation variation in phenotypic plasticity in the speckled wood butterfly, Pararge aegeria. Oikos 78:323–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Simmons LW (1987) Competition between larvae of the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) and its effects on some life-history components of fitness. J Anim Ecol 56:1015–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Spence JR (1989) The habitat templet and life history strategies of pond skaters (Heteroptera: Gerridae): reproductive potential, phenology, and wing dimorphism. Can J Zool 67:2432–2450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stearns SC, Koella JC (1986) The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in life-history traits: predictions of reaction norms for age and size at maturity. Evolution 40:893–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tammaru T, Esperk T (2007) Growth allometry in immature insects: larvae do not grow exponentially. Funct Ecol 21:1099–1105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tauber MJ, Tauber CA, Masaki S (1986) Seasonal adaptations of insects. Oxford University Press, NYGoogle Scholar
  49. Teder T, Esperk T, Remmel T, Sang A, Tammaru T (2010) Counterintuitive size patterns in bivoltine moths: late-season larvae grow larger despite lower food quality. Oecologia 162:117–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Välimäki P, Kivelä SM, Mäenpää MI, Tammaru T (2013) Latitudinal clines in alternative life histories in a geometrid moth. J Evol Biol 26:118–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Van Dyken JD, Wade MJ (2010) The genetic signature of conditional expression. Genetics 184:557–570PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Walters RJ, Hassall M (2006) The temperature size-rule in ectotherms: may a general explanation exist after all? Am Nat 167:510–523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wiklund C, Friberg M (2011) Seasonal development and variation in abundance among four annual flight periods in a butterfly: a 20-year study of the speckled wood (Pararge aegeria). Biol J Linn Soc 102:635–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wiklund C, Nylin S, Forsberg J (1991) Sex-related variation in growth rate as a result of selection for large size and protandry in a bivoltine butterfly, Pieris napi. Oikos 60:241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wilson K, Cotter SC (2008) Density-dependent prophylaxis in insects. In: Ananthekrishnan TN, Whitman DW (eds) Density dependent prophylaxis in insects. Science, Plymouth, pp 137–176Google Scholar
  56. Winterhalter WE, Mousseau TA (2007) Patterns of phenotypic and genetic variation for the plasticity of diapause incidence. Evolution 61:1520–1531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Panu Välimäki
    • 1
  • Sami M. Kivelä
    • 1
  • Maarit I. Mäenpää
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of OuluOuluFinland
  2. 2.Institute of Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations