Skip to main content
Log in

Climate and the evolution of serpentine endemism in California

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We asked whether evolutionary transitions to serpentine endemism are associated with transitions to more favorable environments. Theory and observation suggest that benign (e.g., high rainfall and less extreme temperatures) climates should favor the evolution of habitat specialism, both because such climates may facilitate persistence of small populations with novel adaptations, and because competition with non-specialists may be stronger in benign climates. Non-climatic factors, such as habitat availability, should also be associated with transitions to habitat specialism. We examined phylogenetic transitions to serpentine endemism in 23 Californian plant taxa. We contrasted transitions from serpentine-intolerant ancestors, where speciation entails novel adaptations to serpentine, with transitions from serpentine-tolerant ancestors, where the formation of a new serpentine-endemic taxon may result from an altered competitive environment. We found that transitions to endemism were strongly associated with transitions to regions with more benign climates, but only in the case of endemics arising from intolerant ancestors. In contrast, transitions to endemism from both types of ancestor were associated with transitions to regions with greater habitat availability. These results are consistent with the expectation that benign climates promote the persistence of small populations with novel adaptations both before and after speciation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerly DD (2003) Community assembly, niche conservatism, and adaptive evolution in changing environments. Int J Plant Sci 164:165–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anacker BL (2011) Phylogenetic patterns of endemism and diversity. In: Harrison SP, Rajakaruna N (eds) Serpentine: the evolution and ecology of a model system. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 49–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Anacker BL, Whittall JB, Goldberb EE et al (2011) Origins and consequences of serpentine endemism in the California flora. Evolution 63:365–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod D (1977) Outline history of California vegetation. In: Barbour M, Major J (eds) Terrestrial vegetation of California. Wiley-Interscience, New York, pp 139–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin BG (2005) Origin of the serpentine-endemic herb Layia discoidea from the widespread L. glandulosa (Compositae). Evolution 59:2473–2479

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks RR (1987) Serpentine and its vegetation: a multidisciplinary approach. Dioscorides Press, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie D, Mittelbach G, Cornell H et al (2004) Predictions and tests of climate-based hypotheses of broad-scale variation in taxonomic richness. Ecol Lett 7:1121–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly C, Neilson RP, Phillips DL (1994) A statistical-topographic model for mapping climatological precipitation over mountainous terrain. J Appl Meteorol 3:140–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Kok R (2002) Are plant adaptations to growing on serpentine soil rare or common? A few case studies from New Caledonia. Adansonia 24:229–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans M, Hearn D, Hahn W et al (2005) Climate and life-history evolution in evening primroses (Oenothera, Onagraceae): a phylogenetic comparative analysis. Evolution 59:1914–1927

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan W, Aumann C, Kennedy C et al (2005) Rarity, fragmentation, and the scale dependence of extinction risk in desert fishes. Ecology 86:34–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field R, Hawkins B, Cornell H et al (2009) Spatial species-richness gradients across scales: a meta-analysis. J Biogeogr 36:132–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fjeldsa J, Ehrlich D, Lambin E et al (1997) Are biodiversity “hotspots” correlated with current ecoclimatic stability? A pilot study using the NOAA-AVHRR remote sensing data. Biodiv Conserv 6:401–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma DJ, Moreno G (1988) The evolution of ecological specialization. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 19:207–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Blackburn TM (2000) Pattern and process in macroecology. Blackwell, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gentry A (1986) Endemism in tropical versus temperate plant communities. In: Soule M (ed) Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer, Sunderland, pp 153–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis. http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/BioEdit/bioedit.html

  • Harrison SP, Viers JH, Quinn JF (2000) Climatic and spatial patterns of diversity in the serpentine plants of California. Divers Distrib 6:153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison SP, Safford HD, Grace JB et al (2006) Regional and local species richness in an insular environment: serpentine plants in California. Ecol Monogr 76:41–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison S, Viers J, Thorne J et al (2008) Favorable environments and the persistence of naturally rare species. Conserv Lett 1:65–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins B, Field R, Cornell H et al (2003) Energy, water, and broad-scale geographic patterns of species richness. Ecology 84:3105–3117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansson R, Dynesius M (2002) The fate of clades in a world of recurrent climatic change: Milankovitch oscillations and evolution. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:741–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings C, Strand R (1977) Geologic map of California. California Geologic Data Map Series, Map 2

  • Jetz W, Rahbek C, Colwell R (2004) The coincidence of rarity and richness and the potential signature of history in centres of endemism. Ecol Lett 7:1180–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay KM, Ward KL, Watt LR et al (2011) Plant speciation. In: Harrison SP, Rajakaruna N (eds) Serpentine: the evolution and ecology of a model system. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 71–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruckeberg AR (1954) The ecology of serpentine soils. III. Plant species in relation to serpentine soils. Ecology 35:267–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruckeberg AR (1984) California serpentines: flora, vegetation, geology, soils and management problems. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruckeberg AR (1991) An essay: geoedaphics and island biogeography for vascular plants. Aliso 13:225–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Macnair MR, Gardner M (1998) The evolution of edaphic endemics. In: Howard D, Berlocher S (eds) Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 157–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer MS, Soltis PS (1994) The evolution of serpentine endemics: a chloroplast DNA phylogeny of the Streptanthus glandulosus complex (Cruciferae). Syst Botany 19:557–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer MS, Soltis PS, Soltis DE (1994) The evolution of the Streptanthus glandulosus complex (Cruciferae): genetic divergence and gene flow in serpentine endemics. Am J Bot 81:1288–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Mittermeier R, Mittermeier C et al (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Purvis A, Rambaut A (1995) Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC): an apple macintosh application for analysing comparative data. Bioinformatics 11:247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rambaut A, Charleston M (2001) TreeEdit: phylogenetic tree editor v. 1.0 alpha 10. University of Oxford

  • Raven PH, Axelrod DI (1978) Origin and relationships of the California Flora. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Safford HD, Viers JH, Harrison SP (2005) Serpentine endemism in the California flora: a database of serpentine affinity. Madroño 52:222–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharitz R, McCormick J (1973) Population dynamics of two competing annual plant species. Ecology 54:723–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins GL (1942) The genetic approach to problems of rare and endemic species. Madrono 6:241–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins GL, Major J (1965) Endemism and speciation in the California flora. Ecol Monogr 35:1–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tansley A (1917) On competition between Galium saxatile L. (G. hercynicum Weig.) and Galium sylvestre Poll. (G. asperum Schreb.) on different types of soil. The Journal of Ecology 5:173–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viers J, Thorne J, Quinn J (2006) CalJep: a spatial distribution database of CalFlora and Jepson plant species. San Francisco estuary and watershed science 4

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Carl Boettiger, Jonathan Davies, and Joshua Viers for discussion and comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian L. Anacker.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anacker, B.L., Harrison, S.P. Climate and the evolution of serpentine endemism in California. Evol Ecol 26, 1011–1023 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-011-9532-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-011-9532-4

Keywords

Navigation