Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Unravelling the effects of differential maternal allocation and male genetic quality on offspring viability in the dung beetle, Onthophagus sagittarius

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Good genes models of mate choice assume heritability of fitness-related traits. However, maternal effects can inflate estimates of trait heritability, and genotype-environment interactions can have significant effects on good genes processes of evolution. Thus, partitioning genetic and maternal/environmental sources of variation in studies of good genes mate choice represents an empirical challenge. In this study, we used the dung beetle Onthophagus sagittarius to examine additive genetic and maternal effects on egg-to-adult offspring viability. We used a half-sib full-sib breeding design and manipulated the maternally provided environment by reducing or increasing the mass of the brood ball within which each offspring developed. We found evidence of differential allocation of investment by females in the brood balls they produced. However, experimental manipulations of maternal allocation to brood balls had only a weak and non-significant influence on the sire effects on offspring viability. Significant additive genetic effects on offspring viability were pervasive across our manipulations of the maternally provided larval environment. This finding indicates that although females do show differential allocation to offspring based on sire phenotype, ‘good genes’ benefits of mate choice are not dependent upon differential maternal allocation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilde T, Friberg U, Maklakov AA, Fry JD, Arnqvist G (2008) The genetic architecture of fitness in a seed beetle: assessing the potential for indirect genetic benefits of female choice. BMC Evol Biol 8:295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burley N (1988) The differential allocation hypothesis: an experimental test. Am Nat 132:611–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bussière LF, Hunt J, Stölting KN, Jennions MD, Brooks R (2008) Mate choice for genetic quality when environments vary: sugestions for empirical progress. Genetica 134:69–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cook DF (1998) Sexual selection in dung beetles. II. Female fecundity as an estimate of male reproductive success in relation to horn size, and alternative behavioural strategies in Onthophagus binodis Thunberg (Scarabaeidae: Coleoptera). Aust J Zool 36:521–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham EJA, Russell AF (2000) Egg investment is influenced by male attractiveness in the mallard. Nature 404:74–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • David P, Bjorksten T, Fowler K, Pomiankowski A (2000) Condition-dependent signalling of genetic variation in stalk-eyed flies. Nature 406:186–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Lope F, Møller AP (1993) Female reproductive effort depends on the degree of ornamentation of their mates. Evolution 47:1152–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen DJ (1994) Environmental control of horn length dimorphism in the dung beetle Onthophagus acuminatus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Proc R Soc Lond B 256:131–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen DJ (1997) Alternative reproductive tactics and male dimorphism in the horned beetle Onthophagus acuminatus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:335–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, Essex

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Gonzalez F, Simmons LW (2011) Good genes and sexual selection in dung beetles (Onthophagus taurus): genetic variance in egg-to-adult and adult viability. PLoS One 6:e16233. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halffter G, Edmonds WD (1982) The nesting behavior of dung beetles (Scarabaeinae), an ecological and evolutive approach. Instituto de Ecologia, Mexico, DF

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasselquist D, Bensch S, von Schantz T (1996) Correlation between male song repertoire, extra-pair paternity and offspring survival in the great reed warbler. Nature 381:229–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hedges LV (2009) Effect sizes in nested designs. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC (eds) The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 337–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoikkala A, Aspi J, Suvanto L (1998) Male courtship song frequency as an indicator of male genetic quality in an insect species. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:503–508

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Houle D (1992) Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130:195–204

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Houle D (1998) How should we explain variation in genetic variation of traits? Genetica 102(103):241–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt J, Simmons LW (1997) Patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in beetle horns: an experimental examination of the honest signaling hypothesis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:109–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt J, Simmons LW (1998) Patterns of parental provisioning covary with male morphology in a horned beetle (Onthophagus taurus) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 42:447–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt J, Simmons LW (2000) Maternal and paternal effects on offspring phenotype in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. Evolution 54:936–941

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt J, Simmons LW (2002) Behavioural dynamics of biparental care in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. Anim Behav 64:65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt J, Simmons LW (2004) Optimal maternal investment in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:302–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingleby FC, Hunt J, Hosken DJ (2010) The role of genotype-by-environment interactions in sexual selection. J Evol Biol 23:2031–2045

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jia F-Y, Greenfield MD (1997) When are good genes good? Variable outcomes of female choice in wax moths. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 264:1057–1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia F-Y, Greenfield MD, Collins RD (2000) Genetic variance of sexually selected traits in Waxmoths: maintenance by Genotype x environment interaction. Evolution 54:953–967

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kishi S, Nishida T (2006) Adjustment of parental investment in the dung beetle Onthophagus atripennis (Col., Scarabaeidae). Ethology 112:1239–1245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotiaho JS (2002) Sexual selection and condition dependence of courtship display in three species of horned dung beetles. Behav Ecol 13:791–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotiaho JS, Simmons LW (2003) Longevity cost of reproduction for males but no longevity cost of mating or courtship for females in the male-dimorphic dung beetle Onthophagus binodis. J Insect Physiol 49:817–822

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kotiaho JS, Simmons LW, Tomkins JL (2001) Towards a resolution of the lek paradox. Nature 410:684–686

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kotiaho JS, Simmons LW, Hunt J, Tomkins JL (2003) Males influence maternal effects that promote sexual selection: a quantitative genetic experiment with dung beetles Onthophagus taurus. Am Nat 161:852–859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moczek A, Emlen DJ (1999) Proximate determination of male horn dimorphism in the beetle Onthophagus taurus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). J Evol Biol 12:27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moczek AP, Emlen DJ (2000) Male horn dimorphism in the scarab beetle, Onthophagus taurus: do alternative reproductive tactics favour alternative phenotypes? Anim Behav 59:459–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Qvarnström A (1999) Genotype-by-environment interactions in the determination of the size of a secondary sexual character in the collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis). Evolution 53:1564–1572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qvarnström A, Price TD (2001) Maternal effects, paternal effects and sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol 16:95–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roff DA (1997) Evolutionary quantitative genetics. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roff DA (2008) Comparing sire and dam estimates of heritability: jackknife and likelihood approaches. Heredity 100:32–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon BC (2000) Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications. Trend Ecol Evol 15:397–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (2011) Sexual selection after mating: the evolutionary consequences of sperm competition and cryptic female choice in onthophagines. In: Simmons LW, Ridsdill-Smith TJ (eds) Ecology and evolution of dung beetles. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW, Emlen DJ (2008) No fecundity cost of female secondary sexual trait expression in the horned beetle Onthophagus sagittarius. J Evol Biol 21:1227–1235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW, Holley R (2011) Offspring viability but no apparent costs of mating with high quality males. Biol Lett. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2010.0976

  • Sowig P (1996) Duration and benefits of biparental brood care in the dung beetle Onthophagus vacca (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Ecol Entomol 21(1):81–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucic N, Mikuljanac S, Stojkovic O (1997) Genetic variation and covariation among life history traits in populations of Acanthoscelides obtectus maintained on different hosts. Ent Exp Appl 85:247–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Schantz T, Wittzell H, Göransson G, Grahn M, Persson K (1996) MHC genotype and male ornamentation: genetic evidence for the Hamilton-Zuk model. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 263:265–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson NL, Simmons LW (2010a) Mate choice in the dung beetle Onthophagus sagittarius: are female horns ornaments? Behav Ecol 21:424–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson NL, Simmons LW (2010b) Reproductive competition promotes the evolution of female weaponry. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 277:2035–2040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch AM (2003) Genetic benefits of a female mating preference in gray tree frogs are context-dependent. Evolution 57:883–893

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi A (1975) Mate selection—a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol 53:205–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Australian Research Council, and an International Postgraduate Research Scholarship to NLW. We thank Phil Baker, Peta Compton and Amanda Worth for technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Evolutionary Biology, School of Animal Biology (M092), The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia

    Nicola L. Watson & Leigh W. Simmons

Authors
  1. Nicola L. Watson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leigh W. Simmons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leigh W. Simmons.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watson, N.L., Simmons, L.W. Unravelling the effects of differential maternal allocation and male genetic quality on offspring viability in the dung beetle, Onthophagus sagittarius . Evol Ecol 26, 139–147 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-011-9484-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-011-9484-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation