Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 763–775 | Cite as

Costs of defense: correlated responses to divergent selection for foliar glucosinolate content in Brassica rapa

  • Kirk A. Stowe
  • Robert J. Marquis
Original Paper


The evolutionary response of plant populations to herbivore imposed selection for defense may theoretically be constrained by the costs of defense, yet few studies convincingly demonstrate such costs. We investigated possible constraints on the evolution of defense in rapid cycling Brassica rapa by divergently selecting lines for investment in foliar glucosinolate content, a chemical defense in this species. Costs would then result in a significant correlated response to artificially imposed selection in the direction opposite to the direct response of foliar glucosinolate production. Correlated responses of date of first flowering, total flower number, number of seeds per fruit, and mean seed mass were examined. After three generations of selection, there was a significant direct response in glucosinolate content of the leaves of B. rapa. Furthermore, we found significant correlated responses in both total flower production and number of seeds produced per fruit, but not date of first flowering or mean seed mass. Lines selected for high glucosinolates produced fewer flowers and seeds per fruit compared to those selected for low glucosinolates while lines selected for low glucosinolates showed the opposite response. Thus, costs of defense were demonstrated and may constrain the evolution of foliar glucosinolate production in this plant species.


Cost of defense Brassica rapa Glucosinolates Fitness 



We thank B. Reuter, R. Reese, J. Kramer, and R. Winter for lab and technical support, and S. Srinivasin of Malinkrodt Specialty Chemicals for HPLC grade water. C. Hochwender, J. Le Corff, J. Lill, J. Morisaki, R. Medina, and E. Wold for comments on the manuscript, and J. Cheverud and V. Sork for their advice. This work was partially supported by an NSF predoctoral fellowship, Sigma Xi, Garden Clubs of Missouri Inc., National Federation of State Garden Clubs, and a National Science Foundation Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant DEB#9310992 to K.A.S. This work was conducted as partial fullfilment for a Ph.D. at the University of Missouri-St. Louis.


  1. Agrawal AA, Strauss SY, Stout MJ (1999) Costs of induced responses and tolerance to herbivory in male and female fitness components of wild radish. Evolution 53:1093–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ågren J, Schemske DW (1993) The cost of defense against herbivores: an experimental study of trichome production in Brassica rapa. Am Nat 141:338–350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ågren J, Schemske DW (1994) Evolution of trichome number in a naturalized population of Brassica rapa. Am Nat 143:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alves MN, Sartoratto A, Trigo JR (2007) Scopolamine in Brugmansia suaveolens (Solanaceae): defense, allocation, costs, and induced response. J Chem Ecol 33:297–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrew RL, Wallis IR, Harwood CE et al (2007) Heritable variation in the foliar secondary metabolite sideroxylonal in Eucalyptus confers cross-resistance to herbivores. Oecologia 153:891–901PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berenbaum MR, Zangerl AR, Nitao JK (1986) Constraints on chemical coevolution: wild parsnips and the parsnip webworm. Evolution 40:1215–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergelson J, Purrington CB (1996) Surveying patterns in cost of resistance in plants. Am Nat 148:536–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Briggs MA, Schultz JC (1990) Chemical defense production in Lotus corniculatus L. II. Trade-offs among growth, reproduction and defense. Oecologia 83:32–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cates RB (1975) The interface between slugs and wild ginger: some evolutionary aspects. Ecology 56:391–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chapin FS III (1980) The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 11:233–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Charlesworth D, Morgan MT (1991) Allocation patterns of resource allocation to sex function in flowering plants. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 332:91–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chew FS, Renwick JAA (1994) Host plant choice in Pieris butterflies. In: Carde RT, Bell WJ (eds) Chemical ecology of insects II. Chapman Hall, New York, pp 214–238Google Scholar
  13. Cohen D, Dukas R (1990) The optimal number of female flowers and the fruits-to-flowers ratio in plants under pollination and resource limitation. Am Nat 135:218–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coley PD, Bryant JP, Chapin FS (1985) Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 230:895–899PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Devlin B, Stephenson AG (1987) Sexual variation among plants of perfect-flowering species. Am Nat 130:199–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elle E, van dam NM, Hare JD (1999) Cost of glandular trichomes, a “resistance” character in Datura wrightii Regel (Solancaceae). Evolution 53:22–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman Group Ltd., EssexGoogle Scholar
  18. Feeny PP (1976) Plant apparency and chemical defenses. Recent Adv Phytochem 10:1–40Google Scholar
  19. Fineblum WL, Rausher MD (1995) Tradeoff between resistance and tolerance to herbivore damage in a morning glory. Nature 377:517–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fraenkel GS (1959) The raison d’etre of secondary plant substances. Science 129:1466–1470PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Han K, Lincoln DE (1994) The evolution of carbon allocation to plant secondary metabolite: a genetic analysis of costs in Diplacus aurantiacus. Evolution 48:1550–1563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hare JD, Elle E (2004) Survival and seed production of sticky and velvety Datura wrightii in the field: a five year study. Ecology 85:615–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hare JD, Smith JL II (2005) Competition, herbivory, and reproduction of trichome phenotypes of Datura wrightii. Ecology 86:334–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hare JD, Elle E, van Dam NM (2003) Costs of glandular trichomes in Datura wrightii: a three year study. Evolution 57:793–805PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Herms DA, Mattson WJ (1992) The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Quart Rev Biol 67:283–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hill WG, Cabellero A (1992) Artificial selection experiments. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 23:287–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huang X, Renwick JAA (1994) Relative activities of glucosinolates as oviposition stimulants for Pieris rapae and P. napi oleracea. J Chem Ecol 5:1025–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Huang X, Renwick JAA, Chew FS (1995) Oviposition stimulants and deterrents control acceptance of Alliaria petiole by Pieris rapae and P. napi oleracea. Chemoecology 6:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Karban R, Baldwin IT (1997) Induced responses to herbivory. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  30. Koricheva J (1999) Interpreting phenotypic variation in plant allelochemistry: problems with the use of concentrations. Oecologia 119:467–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Koricheva J (2002) Meta-analysis of sources of variation in fitness costs of plant antiherbivore defenses. Ecology 83:176–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Louda SM, Mole S (1991) Glucosinolates: their chemistry and ecology. In: Rosenthal GA, Berenbaum MR (eds) Herbivores: their relation to plant secondary chemicals, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York, pp 275–310Google Scholar
  33. Louda SM, Rodman JE (1983) Concentration of glucosinolates in relation to habitat and insect herbivory for the native crucifer Cardamine cordifolia. Biochem Syst Ecol 11:199–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marak H, Biere A, Van Damme JMM (2003) Fitness costs of chemical defense in Plantago lanceolata of nutrient and competition stress. Evolution 57:2503–2519Google Scholar
  35. Marquis RJ (1990) Genotypic variation in leaf damage in Piper arieianum (Piperaceae) by a multi-species assemblage of herbivores. Evolution 44:104–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marquis RJ (1992) The selective impact of herbivores. In: Fritz RS, Simms EL (eds) Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 301–325Google Scholar
  37. Mattei JH (1992) Cost and benefits of chemical defense production in Brassica cultivars. Bull Ecol Soc Am 73:264Google Scholar
  38. Mauricio R, Rausher MD, Burdick DS (1997) Variation in the defense strategies of plants: are resistance and tolerance mutually exclusive? Ecology 78:1301–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McKey DM (1979) The distribution of secondary compounds within plants. In: Rosenthal GA, Janzen DH (eds) Herbivores, their interactions with secondary metabolites. Academic Press, New York, pp 55–133Google Scholar
  40. Minchington I, Sang J, Burke D et al (1982) Seperation of desulphoglucosinolates by reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography. J Chromotogr 247:141–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mothershead KM, Marquis RJ (2000) Indirect effects of leaf herbivores on plant-pollinator interactions in Oenothera macrocarpa (Onagraceae). Ecology 81:30–40Google Scholar
  42. Núñez-Farfán J, Dirzo R (1994) Evolutionary ecology of Datura stramonium L. in central Mexico: natural selection for resistance to herbivorous insects. Evolution 48:423–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pilson D (1996) Two herbivores and constraints on selection for resistance in Brassica rapa. Evolution 3:1492–1500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rausher MD (1996) Genetic analysis of coevolution between plants and their natural enemies. Trends Genet 12:212–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rausher MD, Simms EL (1989) The evolution of resistance to herbivory in Ipomoea purpurea. I. Attempts to detect selection. Evolution 43:563–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rhoades DF, Cates R (1976) Toward a general theory of plant antiherbivore chemistry. Rec Adv Phytochem 10:168–213Google Scholar
  47. Rigby MC, Hechinger RF, Stevens L (2002) Why should parasite resistance be costly? Trends Parasitol 18:116–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rodman JE (1991) A taxonomic analysis of glucosinolate-producing plants, part 2: cladistics. Syst Bot 16:619–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rose MR, Service PM, Hutchinson EW (1987) Three approaches to trade-offs in life-history evolution. In: Loeschcke V (ed) Genetic constraints on adaptive evolution. Springer, Berlin, pp 91–105Google Scholar
  50. Roy B, Kichner J (2000) Evolutionary dynamics of pathogen resistance and tolerance. Evolution 54:51–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Sagers CL, Coley PD (1995) Benefits and costs of defense in a neotropical shrub. Ecology 76:1835–1843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sakai S, Harada Y (1998) Does the trade-off between growth and reproduction select for female-biased sexual allocation in cosexual plants? Evolution 52:1204–1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. SAS Institute (1985) SAS user’s guide: statistics, version 5. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  54. Shroff R, Vergara F, Muck A et al (2008) Nonuniform distribution of glucosinolates in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves has important consequences for plant defense. PNAS 105:6196–6201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Siegler DS, Price PW (1976) Secondary compounds in plants: primary function. Am Nat 110:101–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Siemens DH, Mitchell-Olds T (1996) Glucosinolates and herbivory by specialists (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae, Lepidoptera: Plutellidae): consequences of concentration and induced resistance. Eviron Entomol 25:1344–1353Google Scholar
  57. Siemens DH, Mitchell-Olds T (1998) Evolution of pest-induced defense in Brassica plants: test of theory. Ecology 79:632–646Google Scholar
  58. Siemens DH, Garner SH, Mitchell-Olds T et al (2002) Cost of defense in the context of plant competition: Brassica rapa may grow and defend. Ecology 83:505–517Google Scholar
  59. Simms EL (1992) Cost of plant resistance to herbivores. In: Fritz RS, Simms EL (eds) Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 392–425Google Scholar
  60. Simms EL, Fritz RS (1990) The ecology and evolution of host-plant resistance to insects. TREE 5:356–360PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Simms EL, Rausher MD (1987) Costs and benefits of plant defense to herbivory. Am Nat 130:570–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Simms EL, Rausher MD (1989) The evolution of resistance to herbivory in Ipomoea purpurea. II. Natural selection and cost of resistance. Evolution 43:573–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sønderby IE, Geu-Flores F, Halkier BA (2010) Biosynthesis of glucosinolates—gene discovery and beyond. Trends Ecol Evol 15:283–290Google Scholar
  64. Sork VL, Stowe KA, Hochwender C (1993) Evidence for local adaptation in closely adjacent subpopulations of Northern Red Oak (Quercus rubra L.) expressed as resistance to herbivores. Am Nat 142:359–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stanton ML, Preston RE (1988) A qualitative model for evaluating the effects of flower attractiveness on male and female fitness in plants. Am J Bot 75:540–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stowe KA (1998a) Experimental evolution of resistance in Brassica rapa: correlated response of tolerance in lines selected for glucosinolate content. Evolution 52:703–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stowe KA (1998b) Realized defense of artificially selected lines of Brassica rapa: effects of quantitative genetic variation in foliar glucosinolate concentration. Environ Entomol 27:1166–1174Google Scholar
  68. Stowe KA, Sork VL, Farrell AW (1994) Effect of water availability on the phenotypic expression of herbivore resistance in northern red oak seedlings (Quercus rubra L.). Oecologia 100:309–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Strauss SY, Siemens DH, Decher MB et al (1999) Ecological costs of plant resistance to herbivores in the currency of pollination. Evolution 53:1105–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Strauss SY, Rudgers JA, Lau JA et al (2002) Direct costs of resistance to herbivory. TREE 17:278–285Google Scholar
  71. Strauss SY, Watson W, Allen MT (2003) Predictors of male and female tolerance to insect herbivory in Raphanus raphanistrum. Ecology 84:2074–2082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sutherland S, Delph LF (1984) On the importance of male fitness in plants: patterns of fruit set. Ecology 65:1093–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tiffin P (2000) Are tolerance, avoidance, and antibiosis evolutionary and ecologically equivalent responses of plants to herbivores? Am Nat 155:128–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Williams PH, Hill CB (1986) Rapid-cycling populations of Brassica. Science 232:1385–1389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Windle PN, Franz EH (1979) The effects of insect parasitism on plant competition: greenbugs and barley. Ecology 60:521–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zangerl AR, Bazzaz FA (1992) Theory and pattern in plant defense allocation. In: Fritz RS, Simms EL (eds) Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 363–391Google Scholar
  77. Zangerl AR, Berenbaum MR (1997) Costs of chemically defending seeds: furanocoumarins and Pastinaca sativa. Am Nat 150:491–504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Liberal StudiesBeacon CollegeLeesburgUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  3. 3.Department of BiologyUniversity of Missouri-St. LouisSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations