Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 25–43 | Cite as

Inbreeding-environment interactions for fitness: complex relationships between inbreeding depression and temperature stress in a seed-feeding beetle

  • Charles W. Fox
  • R. Craig Stillwell
  • William G. Wallin
  • Carrie L. Curtis
  • David H. Reed
Original Paper


It is commonly argued that inbred individuals should be more sensitive to environmental stress than are outbred individuals, presumably because stress increases the expression of deleterious recessive alleles. However, the degree to which inbreeding depression is dependent on environmental conditions is not clear. We use two populations of the seed-feeding beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus, to test the hypotheses that (a) inbreeding depression varies among rearing temperatures, (b) inbreeding depression is greatest at the more stressful rearing temperatures, (c) the degree to which high or low temperature is stressful for larval development varies with inbreeding level, and (d) inbreeding depression is positively correlated between different environments. Inbreeding depression (δ) on larval development varied among temperatures (i.e., there was a significant inbreeding-environment interaction). Positive correlations for degree of inbreeding depression were consistently found between all pairs of temperatures, suggesting that at least some loci affected inbreeding depression across all temperatures examined. Despite variation in inbreeding depression among temperatures, inbreeding depression did not increase consistently with our proxy for developmental stress. However, inbreeding changed which environments are benign versus stressful for beetles; although 20°C was not a stressful rearing temperature for outbred beetles, it became the most stressful environment for inbred larvae. The finding that inbreeding-environment interactions can cause normally benign environments to become stressful for inbred populations has important consequences for many areas of evolutionary genetics, artificial breeding (for conservation or food production), and conservation of natural populations.


Genetic load Inbreeding depression Stress Temperature 



We thank Frank Messina for providing the SI and BF colonies used in this experiment. This work was funded by the Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station (to CWF) and by the US National Institutes for Health Training Grant #1 K12 GM00708 to the Center for Insect Science, University of Arizona (Postdoctoral Excellence in Research and Teaching fellowship to RCS).

Supplementary material

10682_2010_9376_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (375 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 376 kb)


  1. Armbruster P, Reed DH (2005) Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity 95:235–242CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson D (1994) Temperature and organism size—a biological law for ectotherms. Adv Ecol Res 25:1–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bijlsma R, Bundgaard J, Van Putten WF (1999) Environmental dependence of inbreeding depression and purging in Drosophila melanogaster. J Evol Biol 12:1125–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bijlsma R, Bundgaard J, Boerema AC (2000) Does inbreeding affect the extinction risk of small populations? Predictions from Drosophila. J Evol Biol 13:502–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bilde T, Maklakov AA, Meisner K, la Guardia L, Friberg U (2009) Sex differences in the genetic architecture of lifespan in a seed beetle: extreme inbreeding extends male lifespan. BMC Evol Biol 9:33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chandrakantha J, Mathavan S (1986) Changes in developmental rates and biomass energy in Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) reared on different foods and temperatures. J Stored Prod Res 22:71–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chandrakantha J, Muthukrishnan J, Mathavan S (1987) Effect of temperature and host seed species on the fecundity of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). Proc Indian Acad Sci Anim Sci 96:221–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1987) Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:237–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conti B (2008) Considerations on temperature, longevity and aging. Cell Mol Life Sci 65:1626–1630CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Crnokrak P, Barrett SCH (2002) Purging the genetic load: a review of the experimental evidence. Evolution 56:2347–2358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dahlgaard J, Hoffmann AA (2000) Stress resistance and environmental dependency of inbreeding depression in Drosophila melanogaster. Conserv Biol 14:1187–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dahlgaard J, Loeschcke V (1997) Effects of inbreeding in three life stages of Drosophila buzzatii after embryos were exposed to a high temperature stress. Heredity 78:410–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dahlgaard J, Krebs RA V, Loeschcke V (1995) Heat shock tolerance and inbreeding in Drosophila buzzatii. Heredity 74:157–163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dilda CL, Mackay TFC (2002) The genetic architecture of drosophila sensory bristle number. Genetics 162:1655–1674PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dudash MR (1990) Relative fitness of selfed and outcrossed progeny in a self-compatible, protandrous species, Sabatia angularis (Gentianaceae): a comparison of three environments. Evolution 44:1129–1139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fowler K, Whitlock MC (2002) Environmental stress, inbreeding, and the nature of phenotypic and genetic variance in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 269:677–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fox CW (2005) Problems in measuring among-family variation in inbreeding depression. Am J Bot 92:1929–1932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fox CW, Stillwell RC (2009) Environmental effects on sex differences in the genetic load for adult lifespan in a seed-feeding beetle. Heredity 103:62–72CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fox CW, Bush ML, Roff DA, Wallin WG (2004a) Evolutionary genetics of lifespan and mortality rates in two populations of the seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus. Heredity 92:170–181CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Fox CW, Czesak ME, Wallin WG (2004b) Complex genetic architecture of population differences in adult lifespan of a beetle: nonadditive inheritance, gender differences, body size and a large maternal effect. J Evol Biol 17:1007–1017CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Fox CW, Scheibly KL, Wallin WG, Hitchcock LJ, Stillwell RC, Smith BP (2006) The genetic architecture of life span and mortality rates: gender and species differences in inbreeding load of two seed-feeding beetles. Genetics 174:763–773CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Fox CW, Scheibly KL, Smith BP, Wallin WG (2007) Inbreeding depression in two seed-feeding beetles, Callosobruchus maculatus and Stator limbatus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Bull Entomol Res 97:49–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Fry JD, Heinsohn SL (2002) Environment dependence of mutational parameters for viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 161:1155–1167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Fry JD, Nuzhdin SV, Pasyukova RG, McKay TFC (1998) QTL mapping of genotype-environment interaction for fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res 71:133–141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Haag CR, Sakwiñska O, Ebert D (2003) Test of synergistic interaction between infection and inbreeding in Daphnia magna. Evolution 57:777–783PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Harbison ST, Yamamoto AH, Fanara JJ, Norga KK, Mackay TFC (2004) Quantitative trait loci affecting starvation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 166:1807–1823CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hayes CN, Winsor JA, Stephenson AG (2005) Environmental variation influences the magnitude of inbreeding depression in Cucurbita pepo ssp texana (Cucurbitaceae). J Evol Biol 18:147–155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Jasnos L, Tomala K, Paczesniak D, Korona R (2008) Interactions between stressful environment and gene deletions alleviate the expected average loss of fitness in yeast. Genetics 178:2105–2111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Joron M, Brakefield PM (2003) Captivity masks inbreeding effects on male mating success in butterflies. Nature 424:191–194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Keller LF, Grant PR, Grant BR, Petren K (2002) Environmental conditions affect the magnitude of inbreeding depression in survival of Darwin’s finches. Evolution 56:1229–1239PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Killick SC, Carlsson AM, West SA, Little TJ (2006) Testing the pluralist approach to sex: the influence of environment on synergistic interactions between mutation load and parasitism in Daphnia magna. J Evol Biol 19:1603–1611CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kingsolver JG, Huey RB (2008) Size, temperature, and fitness: three rules. Evol Ecol Res 10:251–268Google Scholar
  33. Kondrashov AS, Houle D (1994) Genotype-environment interactions and the estimation of the genomic mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 258:221–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kristensen TN, Dahlgaard J, Loeschcke V (2003) Effects of inbreeding and environmental stress on fitness—using Drosophila buzzatii as a model organism. Conserv Gen 4:453–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kristensen TN, Sørensen P, Kruhøffer M, Pedersen KS, Loeschcke V (2005) Genome-wide analysis on inbreeding effects on gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 171:157–167CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Kristensen TN, Sørensen P, Pedersen KS, Kruhøffer M, Loeschcke V (2006) Inbreeding by environmental interactions affect gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 173:1329–1336CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kristensen TN, Barker JSF, Pedersen KS, Loeschcke V (2008) Extreme temperatures increase the deleterious consequences of inbreeding under laboratory and semi-natural conditions. Proc R Soc B 275:2055–2061CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Lale NES, Vidal S (2003) Effect of constant temperature and humidity on oviposition and development of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) and Callosobruchus subinnotatus (Pic) on bambara groundnut Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdcourt. J Stor Prod Res 39:459–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Liao W, Reed DH (2009) Inbreeding-environment interactions increase extinction risk. Anim Conserv 12:54–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, Inc, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  41. Marr AB, Arcese P, Hochachka WM, Reid JM, Keller LF (2006) Interactive effects of environmental stress and inbreeding on reproductive traits in a wild bird population. J Anim Ecol 75:1406–1415CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Martin G, Lenormand T (2006) The fitness effect of mutations across environments: a survey in light of fitness landscape models. Evolution 60:2413–2427PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Mbata GN, Johnson M, Phillips TW, Payton M (2005) Mortality of life stages of cowpea weevil (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) exposed to low pressure at different temperatures. J Econ Entomol 98:1070–1075CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Meagher S, Penn DJ, Potts WK (2000) Male-male competition magnifies inbreeding depression in wild house mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:3324–3329CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Messina FJ (1991) Life history variation in a seed beetle: adult egg-laying vs larval competitive ability. Oecologia 85:447–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Messina FJ (1993) Heritability and evolvability of fitness components in Callosobruchus maculatus. Heredity 71:623–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Messina FJ (2004) Predictable modification of body size and competitive ability following a host shift by a seed beetle. Evolution 58:2788–2797PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Mitchell R (1991) The traits of a biotype of Callosobruchus maculatus (F) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) from south India. J Stor Prod Res 27:221–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pedersen KS, Kristensen TN, Loeschcke V (2005) Effects of inbreeding and rate of inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster—Hsp70 expression and fitness. J Evol Biol 18:756–762CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Pedersen KS, Kristensen TN, Loeschcke V, Petersen BO, Duus JO, Nielsen NC, Malmendal A (2008) Metabolomic signatures of inbreeding at benign and stressful temperatures in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 180:1233–1243CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Pray LA, Schwartz JM, Goodnight CJ, Stevens L (1994) Environmental dependency of inbreeding depression—implications for conservation biology. Conserv Biol 8:562–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reed DH, Bryant EH (2001) The relative effects of mutation accumulation versus inbreeding depression on fitness in experimental populations of the housefly. Zoo Biol 20:145–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Reed DH, Lowe EH, Briscoe DA, Frankham R (2003a) Fitness and adaptation in a novel environment: effect of inbreeding, prior environment, and lineage. Evolution 57:1822–1828PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Reed DH, O’Grady JJ, Ballou JD, Frankham R (2003b) Frequency and severity of catastrophic die-offs in vertebrates. Anim Conserv 6:109–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Reed DH, Nicholas AC, Stratton GE (2007) The genetic quality of individuals directly impacts population dynamics. Animal Conserv 10:275–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Roff DA (1998) Effects of inbreeding on morphological and life history traits of the sand cricket, Gryllus firmus. Heredity 81:28–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shabalina SA, Yampolsky LY, Kondrashov AS (1997) Rapid decline of fitness in panmictic populations of Drosophila melanogaster maintained under relaxed natural selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci 94:13034–13039CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Shade RE, Murdock LL, Kitch LW (1999) Interactions between cowpea weevil (Coleoptera : Bruchidae) populations and Vigna (Leguminosae) species. J Econ Entomol 92:740–745Google Scholar
  59. Smartt J (1985) Evolution of grain legumes. 3. Pulses in the genus Vigna. Exper Agric 21:87–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stanton ML, Thiede DA (2005) Statistical convenience vs biological insight: consequences of data transformation for the analysis of fitness variation in heterogeneous environments. New Phytol 166:319–337CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Stillwell RC, Fox CW (2007) Environmental effects on sexual size dimorphism of a seed-feeding beetle. Oecologia 153:273–280CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Stillwell RC, Wallin WG, Hitchcock LJ, Fox CW (2007) Phenotypic plasticity in a complex world: interactive effects of food and temperature on fitness components of a seed beetle. Oecologia 153:309–321CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Swindell WR, Bouzat JL (2006) Selection and inbreeding depression: effects of inbreeding rate and inbreeding environment. Evolution 60:1014–1022PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Szafraniec K, Borts RH, Korona R (2001) Environmental stress and mutational load in diploid strains of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98:1107–1112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Tanaka Y (1990) Age specificity of inbreeding depression during a life cycle of Callosobruchus chinensis (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Res Popul Ecol 32:329–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tanaka Y (1993) A genetic mechanism for the evolution of senescence in Callosobruchus chinensis (the azuki bean weevil). Heredity 70:318–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tran BMD, Credland PF (1995) Consequences of inbreeding for the cowpea seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (F) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Biol J Linn Soc 56:483–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Van Noordwijk AJ, Scharloo W (1981) Inbreeding in an island population of the great tit. Evolution 35:674–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vermeulen CJ, Bijlsma R (2004) Changes in mortality patterns and temperature dependence of lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster caused by inbreeding. Heredity 92:275–281CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Vermeulen CJ, Bijlsma R, Loeschcke V (2008) A major QTL affects temperature sensitive adult lethality and inbreeding depression in life span in Drosophila melanogaster. BMC Evol Biol 8:297CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Vieira C, Pasyukova EG, Zeng ZB, Hackett JB, Lyman RF, Mackay TFC (2000) Genotype-environment interaction for quantitative trait loci affecting life span in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 154:213–227PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Waller DM, Dole J, Bersch AJ (2008) Effects of stress and phenotypic variation on inbreeding depression in Brassica rapa. Evolution 62:917–931CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Weinig C, Dorn LA, Kane NC, German ZM, Halldorsdottir SS, Ungerer MC, Toyonaga Y, Mackay TFC, Purugganan MD, Schmitt J (2003) Heterogeneous selection at specific loci in natural environments in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 165:321–329PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Willi Y, Dietrich S, van Kleunen M, Fischer M (2007) Inter-specific competitive stress does not affect the magnitude of inbreeding depression. Evol Ecol Res 9:959–974Google Scholar
  75. Zhong D, Pai A, Yan G (2005) Costly resistance to parasitism: evidence from simultaneous quantitative trait loci mapping for resistance and fitness in Tribolium castaneum. Genetics 169:2127–2135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles W. Fox
    • 1
  • R. Craig Stillwell
    • 1
    • 2
  • William G. Wallin
    • 1
  • Carrie L. Curtis
    • 1
  • David H. Reed
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EntomologyUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of EntomologyUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  3. 3.Department of BiologyUniversity of LouisvilleLouisvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations