Skip to main content
Log in

Reproductive barriers between populations of the cereal rust mite Abacarus hystrix confirm their host specialization

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that certain host populations of the cereal rust mite Abacarus hystrix are highly specialized in their host use and it is likely that reproductive isolation exists between them. Here I verified this expectation by testing for reproductive barriers between ryegrass and quackgrass populations of A. hystrix. I performed reciprocal crosses between individuals from both populations and observed results of crosses. Leaves of the three grass species, ryegrass, quackgrass and wheat, were used as mating arenas. I used two criteria to determine reproductive barriers between strains: the proportion of female progeny and viability of progeny. If studied populations of this haplodiploid species are reproductively isolated a male-biased sex ratio and/or hybrid progeny of reduced viability would be expected. I found that in the presence of quackgrass and ryegrass pre-zygotic barriers between studied populations exists. On wheat I observed asymmetry in reproductive barriers. Between females from quackgrass and males from ryegrass a pre-zygotic barrier existed (only males obtained). However, the opposite reciprocal cross (females from ryegrass and males from quackgrass) produced progeny of both sexes. A male-biased sex ratio and low adult emergence suggests that post-zygotic mechanisms acted here. Low viability of progeny obtained from crosses in which females from ryegrass were engaged suggests that the origin of the female nymph acted as a predictor of hybrid inviability. The pattern of sterility observed in the cereal rust mite indicates that in the presence of three hosts (ryegrass, quackgrass and wheat) pre- and post-zygotic reproductive barriers between quackgrass and ryegrass populations of this mite exist. In addition to host fidelity (which acts as pre-zygotic barrier) there are post-zygotic barriers to gene flow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amrine J, Stasny TA (1994) Catalog of the Eriophyoidea (Acarina, Prostigmata) of the world. Indira Publishing House, West Bloomfield, Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton NH, Hewitt GM (1985) Analysis of hybrid zones. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16:113–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlocher SH, Feder JL (2002) Sympatric speciation in phytophagous insects: moving beyond controversy? Annu Rev Entomol 47:773–815

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bush GL (1969) Sympatric host race formation and speciation in frugivorous flies of the genus Rhagoletis (Diptera, Tephritidae). Evolution 23:237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman GP (2002) The biology of grasses. CABI Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig TP, Itami JK, Abrahamson WG, Horner JD (1993) Behavioral evidence for host-race formation in Eurosta solidaginis. Evolution 47:1696–1710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diehl SR, Bush GL (1989) The role of habitat preference in adaptation and speciation. In: Otte D, Endler JA (eds) Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp 345–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzanskhy T (1970) Genetics of the evolutionary process. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dres M, Mallet J (2002) Host races in plant-feeding insects and their importance in sympatric speciation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 357:471–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Emelianov I, Mallet J, Baltensweiler W (1995) Genetic differentiation in Zeiraphera diniana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae, the larch budmoth): polymorphism, host races or sibling species. Heredity 75:416–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emelianov I, Marec F, Mallet J (2004) Genomic evidence for divergence with gene flow in host races of the larch budmoth. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feder JL, Opp S, Wlazlo B, Reynolds K, Go W, Spisak S (1994) Host fidelity is an effective pre-mating barrier between sympatric races of the apple maggot fly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:7990–7994

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forister ML (2004) Oviposition preference and larval performance within a diverging lineage of lycaenid butterflies. Ecol Entomol 29:264–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost WE, Ridland PM (1996) Grasses. In: Lindquist EE, Sabelis MW, Bruin J (eds) Eriophyoid mites—their biology, natural enemies and control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 619–629

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Funk DJ, Filchak KE, Feder JL (2002) Herbivorous insects: model systems for the comparative study of speciation ecology. Genetica 116:251–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helle W, Wysoki M (1996) Arrhenotokous parthenogenesis. In: Lindquist EE, Sabelis MW, Bruin J (eds) Eriophyoid mites—their biology, natural enemies and control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 169–172

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Insightful Corporation (2005) S-PLUS 7.0 for windows professional edition. Insightful Corporation, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PA, Hoppensteadt FC, Smith JJ, Bush GL (1996) Conditions for sympatric speciation: a diploid model incorporating habitat fidelity and non-habitat assortative mating. Evol Ecol 10:187–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly JK, Noor MAF 1996. Speciation by reinforcement: a model derived from studies of Drosophila. Genetics 143:1485–1497

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitter C, Farrell B, Weigmann B (1988) The phylogenetic study of adaptive zones: has phytophagy promoted insect diversification? Am Nat 132:107–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mopper S (1996) Adaptive genetic structure in phytophagous insect populations. Tree 11:235–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Nault LR, Styer WE (1969) The dispersal of Aceria tulipae and three other grass-infesting eriophyid mites in Ohio. Ann Entomol Soc Am 62:1446–1455

    Google Scholar 

  • Nice CC, Fordyce JA, Shapiro AM, Ffrench-Constant R (2002) Lack of evidence for reproductive isolation among ecologically specialised lycaenid butterflies. Ecol Entomol 27:702–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishimura S, Hinomoto N, Takafuji A (2005) Gene flow and spatio-temporal genetic variation among sympatric populations of Tetranychus kanzawai (Acari: Tetranychidae) occurring on different host plants, as estimated by microsatellite gene diversity. Exp Appl Acarol 35:59–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nosil P (2007) Divergent host plant adaptation and reproductive isolation between ecotypes of Timema cristinae walking sticks. Am Nat 169:151–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield GN (1996) Diversity and host plant specificity. In: Lindquist EE, Sabelis MW, Bruin J (eds) Eriophyoid mites—their biology, natural enemies and control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 199–216

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield GN, Michalska K (1996) Spermatophore deposition, mating behaviour and population mating structure. In: Lindquist EE, Sabelis MW, Bruin J (eds) Eriophyoid mites—their biology, natural enemies and control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 185–198

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield GN, Proeseler G (1996) Eriophyoid mites as vectors of plant pathogens. In: Lindquist EE, Sabelis MW, Bruin J (eds) Eriophyoid mites—their biology, natural enemies and control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 259–273

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rice WR (1987) Speciation via habitat specialization: the evolution of reproductive isolation as correlated character. Evol Ecol 1:301–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rundle HD, Whitlock M (2001) A genetic interpretation of ecologically dependent isolation. Evolution 55:198–201

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sabelis MW, Bruin J (1996) Evolutionary ecology: life history patterns, food plant choice and dispersal. In: Lindquist EE, Sabelis MW, Bruin J (eds) Eriophyoid mites—their biology, natural enemies and control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 329–365

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schluter D (2001) Ecology and the origin of species. Trends Ecol Evol 16:372–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skoracka A, Kuczyński L (2004) Demography of the cereal rust mite Abacarus hystrix (Acari: Eriophyoidea) on quack grass. Exp Appl Acarol 32:231–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skoracka A, Kuczyński L (2006a) Is the cereal rust mite, Abacarus hystrix really a generalist?—testing colonization performance on novel hosts. Exp Appl Acarol 38:1–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skoracka A, Kuczyński L (2006b) Host related differences in the development and reproduction of the cereal rust mite, Abacarus hystrix (Acari: Eriophyidae) in Poland. Int J Acarol 32:394–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skoracka A, Kuczyński L, Magowski W (2002) Morphological variation in different host populations of Abacarus hystrix (Nalepa, 1896) (Acari: Prostigmata: Eriophyoidea). Exp Appl Acarol 26:187–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skoracka A, Kuczyński L, Rector B (2007) Divergent host-acceptance behavior suggests host specialization in populations of the polyphagous mite Abacarus hystrix (Nalepa) (Acari: Prostigmata: Eriophyidae). Environ Entomol (in press)

  • Strong DR, Lawton JH, Southwood TRE (1984) Insects on plants—community patterns and mechanisms. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Via S (1990) Ecological genetics and host adaptation in herbivorous insects: the experimental study of evolution in natural and agricultural systems. Annu Rev Entomol 35:421–446

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Via S (1991) The genetic structure of host plant adaptation in a spatial patchwork: demographic variability among reciprocally transplanted pea aphid clones. Evolution 45:827–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Via S (1999) Reproductive isolation between sympatric races of pea aphids. I. Gene flow restriction and habitat choice. Evolution 53:1446–1457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virdee SR, Hewitt MH (1994) Clines for hybrid dysfunction in a grasshopper hybrid zone. Evolution 48:392–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh BD (1864) On phytophagic varieties and phytophagic species. Proc Entomol Soc Phil 3:403–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Waring GL, Abrahamson WG, Howard DJ (1990) Genetic differentiation among host-associated populations of the gallmaker Eurosta solidaginis (Diptera, Tephritidae). Evolution 44:1648–1655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu C, Beckenbach AT (1983) Evidence for extensive genetic differentiation between the sex-ratio and the standard arrangement of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis and identification of hybrid sterility factors. Genetics 105:71–86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Lechosław Kuczyński (AMU, Poland), Brian Rector (USDA-ARS-EBCL, Montpellier) and anonymous referees for helpful and valuable remarks on the manuscript. The study was supported by the Polish Committee for Scientific Research (grant no. 3P04C03825).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Skoracka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skoracka, A. Reproductive barriers between populations of the cereal rust mite Abacarus hystrix confirm their host specialization. Evol Ecol 22, 607–616 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-007-9185-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-007-9185-5

Keywords

Navigation