Abstract
Sexual selection theory implies a tight coupling between the evolution of male sexual display and the sensory capabilities of the female. In sexually dimorphic species it is proposed that this might lead to sex differences in a species’ perceptive abilities. However, supporting evidence for this is rare, and to date there is only one example; three-spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Here, the female’s visual system is reported to become more red-sensitive during the summer breeding season; a time when sexually mature males display a red throat and belly to potential mates. In contrast, a shift in sensitivity is not apparent in males. These results, although commonly quoted, are surprising because previous observations suggest that both sexes may benefit from the detection of the male’s red colour patch; in females the intensity of red coloration can influence the choice of mate, and in males the conspicuous red colouration can aid the detection of rival males. To investigate this paradox we repeated the original optomotor experiment using a fully controlled design. In contrast to the earlier result, we found that both males and females exhibit a shift in their sensitivity to red during the reproductive period. These new data therefore do not support the hypothesis that sex differences in perceptual abilities occur in sexually dimorphic species.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 3–52
Bakker TCM, Mundwiler B (1994) Female mate choice and male red coloration in a natural three-spine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) population. Behav Ecol 5:74–80
Beatty DD (1966) A study of the succession of visual pigments in Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus). Can J Zool 44:429–455
Boughman JW (2001) Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature 411:944–947
Boulcott, Pand Braithwaite VA (2005) Ultraviolet light and visual behaviour in the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 78:736–743
Braithwaite VA, Barber I (2000) Limitations to colour based sexual preferences in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47:413–416
Bridges CDB (1972) The rhodopsin-porphyropsin visual system. In: Dartnall HJA (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology, Vol. VII/1. Springer Verlag, New York, pp 471–480
Capranica RR (1976) Morphology and physiology of the auditory system. In: Llinas R, Precht W (eds) Frog neurobiology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 551–575
Cronin TW, Jarvilehto M, Weckstrom M, Lall AB (2000) Tuning of photoreceptor sensitivity in fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). J Comp Physiol A 186:1–12
Cronly-Dillon JR, Sharma SC (1968) Effect of season and sex on the photopic sensitivity of the three-spined stickleback. J Exp Biol 49:679–687
Douglas RH, Hawryshyn CW (1990) Behavioural studies of fish vision: an analysis of visual capabilities. In: Douglas RH, Djamgoz MBA (eds) The Visual System of Fish. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 279–343
Endler JA (1992) Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am Nat. 139:S125–S153
Endler JA (1993) Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems. Philos T Roy Soc B 340:215–225
Endler JA, McLellan T (1988) The processes of evolution: towards a newer synthesis. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 19:395–421
Fisher RA (1915) The evolution of sexual preference. Eugen Rev 7:184–192
Fleishman LJ (1988) Sensory influences on physical design of a visual display. Anim Behav 36:1420–1424
Hoy RR (1978) Acoustic communication in crickets: A model system for the study of feature detection. Fed Proc 37:2316–2323
Kirkpatrick M (1982) Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36:1–12
Kröger RHH, Knoblauch B, Wagner H-J (2003) Rearing in different photic and spectral environments changes the optomotor response to chromatic stimuli in cichlid fish (Aequidens pulcher). J Exp Biol 206:1643–1648
Knowles A, Dartnall HJA (1977) The photobiology of vision. In Davson H (ed) The eye. Academic Press, London , pp 247–497
Lorenz K (1970) Studies in animal and human behaviour. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 403 pp
McDonald CG, Hawryshyn CW (1995) Intraspecific variation of the spectral sensitivity in the three-spine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) from different photic regimes. J Comp Physiol A 176:255–260
McLennan DA, McPhail JD (1990) Experimental investigations of the evolutionary significance of sexually dimorphic nuptial coloration in Gasterosteus aculeatus (L.): the relationship between male colour and female behaviour. Can J Zool 68:482–492
Muntz WRA, Northmore DPM (1973) Scotopic spectral sensitivity in a teleost fish, (Scardinius erythrophthalmus) adapted to different daylengths. Vision Res 13:245–252
Muntz WBA, Wainwright AW (1978) Annual cycles in the light environments and visual mechanisms of fishes. In: Thorpe JE (ed) Rhythmic activity of fishes. Academic Press: London, pp 105–129
Ostlund-Nilsson S, Holmlund M (2003) The artistic three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteous aculeatus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 53:214–220
Partridge JC, Cummings ME (1999) Adaptation of visual pigments to the aquatic environment. In: Archer SN, Djamgoz MBA, Loew ER, Partridge JC, Valerga S (eds) Adaptive mechanisms in the ecology of vision. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, pp 251–284
Pelkwijk JJ Ter, Tinbergen N (1937) Eine reizbiologische Analyse einiger Verhaltensweisen von Gasterosteus aculeatus L. Z Tierz Züchtungsbio 1:193–204
Reimchen TE (1989) Loss of nuptial colour in three-spine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Evolution 43:450–460
Reimchen TE (1994) Predators and morphological evolution in threespine stickleback. In: Bell MA, Foster SA (eds) The evolutionary ecology of the threespine stickleback. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 240–273
Rick IP, Modarressie R, Bakker TCM (2006) UV wavelengths affect female mate choice in three-spined sticklebacks. Anim Behav 71:307–313
Rowe MP, Baube CL, Loew ER, Phillips JB (2004) Optimal mechanisms for finding and selecting mates: how threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) should encode male throat colors. J Comp Physiol A 190:241–256
Rowland WJ (1994) Proximate determinants of stickleback behaviour: an evolutionary perspective. In: Bell MA, Foster SA (eds) The evolutionary ecology of the threespine stickleback. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 297–344
Ryan MJ (1990a) Signals, species and sexual selection. Am Sci 78:46–52
Ryan MJ (1990b) Sexual selection, sensory systems and sensory exploitation. In: Futuyma D, Antonovics J (eds) Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology, vol 7. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 157–195
Sargent RC, Rush VN, Wisenden BD, Yan HY (1998) Courtship and mate choice in fishes: integrating behavioural and sensory ecology. Am Zool 38:82–96
Scott RJ (2001) Sensory drive and nuptial colour loss in the three-spined stickleback. J Fish Biol 59:1520–1528
Smith C, Barber I, Wootton RJ, Chittka L (2004) A receiver bias in the origin of three-spined stickleback mate choice. Proc Roy Soc B 271:949–955
Thorpe A, Douglas RH (1993) Spectral transmission and short-wave absorbing pigments in the fish lens—II. Effects of age. Vision Res 33:301–307
Tinbergen N (1951) (1989) The study of instinct. Clarendon, Oxford, 154 pp
Wootton RJ, Smith C (2000) A long-term study of a short-lived fish: the demography of Gasterosteus aculeatus. Behaviour 137:981–997
Acknowledgements
We thank Derek Cosens for his invaluable advice and practical assistance throughout the course of this study, Loch Lomond and The Trossachs National Park, Julian Partridge, and the Darwin Workshop for their help in the construction of experimental apparatus. We would also like to acknowledge the valuable input from two anonymous referees during the compilation of this paper. Funding for this experiment came from Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boulcott, P., Braithwaite, V.A. Colour perception in three-spined sticklebacks: sexes are not so different after all. Evol Ecol 21, 601–611 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-006-9138-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-006-9138-4