Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 381–393 | Cite as

Correlated patterns of variation in phenology and seed production in populations of two annual grasses along an aridity gradient

  • Sergei Volis
Original Paper


I applied a comparative approach to reveal correlated patterns of variation in phenology and seed production in four populations of two annual grasses Hordeum spontaneum and Avena sterilis, sampled in the same environments distributed along an aridity gradient in Israel. The steep aridity gradient in Israel represents two parallel clines of environmental productivity (annual rainfall) and predictability (variation in amount and timing of annual rainfall) that is likely to induce similar responses in natural plant populations distributed along the gradient, if (1) selection is strong, (2) species share the same ecological niche, and (3) there is genetic variation for ecologically important traits. I found in plants of both species (1) ultimate advance in onset of flowering, and (2) more but smaller seeds, with increasing aridity. The broad sense heritabilities of onset of flowering, seed size and seed yield in both species were very high, moderate and low, respectively. It appears that the observed adaptive complex of traits have evolved in both species in response to this specific array of environments.


Local adaptation Seed size-number trade-off Population differentiation Comparative approach 



I would like to thank Mark van Kleunen and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.


  1. Andersson S (1996) Floral variation in Saxifraga granulata: phenotypic selection, quantitative genetics and predicted response to selection. Heredity 77:217–223Google Scholar
  2. Aronson J, Kigel J, Shmida A (1990) Comparative plant sizes and reproductive strategies in desert and Mediterranean populations of ephemeral plants. Isr J Bot 39:413–430Google Scholar
  3. Aronson J, Kigel J, Shmida A, Klein J (1992) Adaptive phenology of desert and Mediterranean populations of annual plants grown with and without water stress. Oecologia 89:17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bitan A, Rubin S (1991) Climatic atlas of Israel for physical and environmental planning and design The Israeli Ministry of Transport, JerusalemGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonnin I, Prosperi JM, Olivieri I (1997) Comparison of quantitative genetic parameters between two natural populations of a selfing plant species, Medicago truncatula Gaertn. Theor Appl Genet 94:641–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown AHD, Zohary D, Nevo E (1978) Outcrossing rates and heterozygosity in natural populations of Hordeum spontaneum Koch in Israel. Heredity 41:49–62Google Scholar
  7. Cohen D (1966) Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment. J Theor Biol 12:119–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen D (1971) Maximizing final yield when growth is limited by time or by limiting resources. J Theor Biol 33:299–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper JP (1963) Species and population differences in climatic response. In: Evans LT (ed) Environmental control of plant growth. Academic Press, New York, pp 381–403Google Scholar
  10. Davis MB, Shaw RG, Etterson JR (2005) Evolutionary responses to changing climate. Ecology 86:1704–1714Google Scholar
  11. Del Pozo A, Ovalle C, Aronson J, Avendano J (2002) Ecotypic differentiation in Medicago polymorpha L. along an environmental gradient in central Chile. I. Phenology, biomass production and reproductive patterns. Plant Ecol 159:119–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellner S (1987) Alternative plant life hystory strategies and coexistence in randomly varying environments. Vegetatio 69:199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Etterson JR (2004) Evolutionary potential of Chamaecrista fasciculata in relation to climate change. I. Clinal patterns of selection along an environmental gradient in the Great Plains. Evolution 58:1446–1458PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Greene DF, Johnson EA (1994) Estimating the mean annual seed production of trees. Ecology 75:642–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Gross KL (1984) Effects of seed size and growth form on seedling establishment of 6 monocarpic perennial plants. J Ecol 72:369–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gross KL, Smith AD (1991) Seed mass and emergence time effects on performance of Panicum dichotomiflorum Michx across environments. Oecologia 87:270–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gutterman Y (1992) Ecophysiology of Negev upland annual grasses. In: Chapman GP (ed) Desertified grasslands: their biology and management. Academic Press, London, pp 145–162Google Scholar
  19. Gutterman Y (1993) Seed germination in desert plants. Springer Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  20. Gutterman Y, Gozlan S (1998) Amounts of winter or summer rain triggering germination and ‘the point of no return’ of seedling desiccation tolerance, of some Hordeum spontaneum local ecotypes in Israel. Plant Soil 204:223–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harlan RJ, Zohary D (1966) Distribution of wild wheats and barley. Science 153:1074–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harvey AP, Pagel MD (1991) The comparative method. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  23. Houle D (1992) Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130:195–204PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Jakobsson A, Eriksson O (2000) A comparative study of seed number, seed size, seedling size and recruitment in grassland plants. Oikos 88:494–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jakobsson A, Eriksson O (2003) Trade-offs between dispersal and competitive ability: a comparative study of wind-dispersed Asteraceae forbs. Evol Ecol 17:233–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson AW (1968) The evolution of desert vegetation in western North America. In: Brown GW (ed) Desert Biology. Academic Press, New York, pp 101–140Google Scholar
  27. Kadmon R, Danin A (1997) Floristic variation in Israel: a GIS analysis. Flora 192:341–345Google Scholar
  28. Kaplan RH, Cooper WS (1984) The evolution of developmental plasticity in reproductive characteristics: an application of the adaptive coin-flip principle. Am Nat 123:393–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. King D, Roughgarden J (1982) Graded allocation between vegetative and reproductive growth for annual plants in growing seasons of random length. Theor Popul Biol 22:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lacey EP (1986) The genetic and environmental control of reproductive timing in a short-lived monocarpic species Daucus carota (Umbelliferae). J Ecol 74:73–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lalonde RG, Roitberg BD (1989) Resource limitation and offspring size and number trade-offs in Cirsium arvense (Asteraceae). Am J Bot 76:1107–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leishman MR, Westoby M (1994a) The role of large seed size in shaded conditions – experimental evidence. Funct Ecol 8:205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leishman MR, Westoby M (1994b) The role of seed size in seedling establishment in dry soil conditions – experimental evidence from semiarid species. J Ecol 82:249–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leishman MR, Wright IJ, Moles AT, Westoby M (2000) The evolutionary ecology of seed size. In: Fenner M (ed) Seeds: the ecology of regeneration in plant communities. CAB Int., Wallingford, UK, pp 31–57Google Scholar
  35. Levitt J (1980) Responses of plants to environmental stress. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. McGinley MA (1989) Within and among plant variation in seed mass and pappus size in Tragopogon dubios. Can J Bot 67:1298–1304Google Scholar
  37. Partridge L, Sibly R (1991) Constraints in the evolution of life histories. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 332:3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peterson CJ, Facelli JM (1992) Contrasting germination and seedling growth of Betula alleghaniensis and Rhus typhina subjected to various amounts and types of plant litter. Am J Bot 79:1209–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Phillips TD, Murphy JP, Goodman MM (1993) Isozyme variation in germplasm accessions of the wild oat Avena sterilis L. Theor Appl Genet 86:54–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Price MV, Joyner JW (1997) What resources are available to desert granivores: Seed rain or soil seed bank? Ecology 78:764–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Price T, Langen T (1992) Evolution of correlated characters. Trends Evol Ecol 7:307–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reader RJ (1993) Control of seedling emergence by ground cover and seed predation in relation to seed mass for some old-field species. J Ecol 81:169–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rehfeldt GE, Ying CC, Spittlehouse DL, Hamilton DA (1999) Genetic responses to climate in Pinus contorta: niche breadth, climate change, and reforestation. Ecol Monogr 69:375–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rodriguez-Girones MA, Sandsten H, Santamaria L (2003) Asymmetric competition and the evolution of propagule size. J Ecol 91:554–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sanchez Del Arco MJ, Torner C, Fernandez Quintanilla C (1995) Seed dynamics in populations of Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana. Weed Res 35:477–487Google Scholar
  46. Seger J, Brockmann HJ (1987) What is bet-hedging?. In: Harvey PH, Partridge L (eds) Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 182–211Google Scholar
  47. Shipley B, Dion J (1992) The allometry of seed production in herbaceous angiosperms. Am Nat 139:467–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stanton ML, Roy BA, Thiede DA (2000) Evolution in stressful environments. I. Phenotypic variability, phenotypic selection, and response to selection in five distinct environmental stresses. Evolution 54:93–111PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. StatSoft Inc. (2004) STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 7. www.statsoft.comGoogle Scholar
  50. Stearns SC (1976) Life-history tactics: a review of the ideas. Q Rev Biol 51:3–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stearns SC (1977) The evolution of life history traits. A critique of the theory and a review of the data. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 8:145–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  53. Thompson K, Band SR, Hodgson JG (1993) Seed size and shape predict persistance in the soil. Funct Ecol 7:236–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Turnbull LA, Rees M, Crawley MJ (1999) Seed mass and the competition/colonization trade-off: a sowing experiment. J Ecol 87:899–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. van Groenendael JM (1985) Differences in life histories between two ecotypes of Plantago lanceolata L. In: White J (ed) Studies on plant demography: a Festschrift for John L. Harper. Academic Press, London, pp 51–67Google Scholar
  56. Volis S, Mendlinger S, Ward D (2002a) Adaptive traits of wild barley plants of Mediterranean and desert origin. Oecologia 133:131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Volis S, Mendlinger S, Ward D (2002b) Differentiation in populations of Hordeum spontaneum along a gradient of environmental productivity and predictability: life history and local adaptation. Biol J LinnSoc 77:479–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Volis S, Mendlinger S, Ward D (2002c) Differentiation in populations of Hordeum spontaneum Koch along a gradient of environmental productivity and predictability: plasticity in response to water and nutrient stress. Biol J Linn Soc 75:301–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Volis S, Mendlinger S, Ward D (2004a) Demography and role of the seed bank in Mediterranean and desert populations of wild barley, Hordeum spontaneum Koch. Basic and Applied Ecology 5:53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Volis S, Verhoeven K, Mendlinger S, Ward D, (2004b) Phenotypic selection and regulation of reproduction in different environments in wild barley. J Evol Biol 17:1121–1131Google Scholar
  61. Wardle DA, Barker GM, Bonner KI, Nicholson KS (1998) Can comparative approaches based on plant ecophysiological traits predict the nature of biotic interactions and individual plant species effects in ecosystems? J Ecol 86:405–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Weber E, Schmid B (1998) Latitudinal population differentiation in two species of Solidago (Asteraceae) introduced into Europe. Am J Bot 85:1110–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Weiner J, Thomas SC (1986) Size variability and competition in plant monocultures. Oikos 47:211–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zohary D (1983) Wild genetic resources of crops in Israel. Isr J Bot 32:97–127Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Life Sciences DepartmentBen-Gurion University of the NegevBeer ShevaIsrael

Personalised recommendations