Abstract
SPAD-502 (Minolta Ltd, Osaka Japan), a hand-held chlorophyll meter is widely used in the synchronization of N supply with actual crop demand, however it is also known, that genotype and environment may effect SPAD value. Consequently, the aim of this study was to evaluate the genetic and environmental variation in SPAD value and to determine the relationship between SPAD value at heading (GS 59) and grain yield. Field experiments were conducted in three consecutive cropping seasons between 2012 and 2015 in Hungary and forty winter wheat varieties were tested at two nitrogen levels. Strong significant positive correlation was found between grain yield and SPAD values, but it was highly influenced by cultivars. The proportion of the phenotypical variance explained by the cultivars was different in each growing season and was ranged from 12.50 to 59.04 %. Additionally, it was revealed that the cultivars can be categorised by different SPAD—yield relationship and modern cultivar can be separated into five groups. While same SPAD value can predict different yield level in different cultivars it can be concluded, that SPAD value should be calibrated for cultivar. Based on regression analysis, such an option is also presented here for forty important wheat cultivars. Hence, cultivar specific SPAD value at heading can provide a more accurate estimate of the final yield in wheat.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balla K, Karsai I, Kiss T, Bencze S, Bedő Z, Veisz O (2012) Productivity of a doubled haploid winter wheat population under heat stress. Open Life Sci. doi:10.2478/s11535-012-0097-1
Bavec F, Bavec M (2001) Chlorophyll meter readings of winter wheat cultivars and grain yield prediction. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 32:2709–2719. doi:10.1081/CSS-120000956
Bojović B, Marković A (2009) Correlation between nitrogen and chlorophyll content in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Kragujev J Sci 31:69–74
Debaeke P, Rouet P, Justes E (2006) Relationship between the normalized SPAD index and the nitrogen nutrition index: application to durum wheat. J Plant Nutr 29:75–92. doi:10.1080/01904160500416471
Denuit J-P, Olivier M, Goffaux M-J, Herman J-L, Goffart J-P, Destain J-P, Frankinet M (2002) Management of nitrogen fertilization of winter wheat and potato crops using the chlorophyll meter for crop nitrogen status assessment. Agronomie 22:847–853. doi:10.1051/agro:2002065
Fox RH, Piekielek WP, Macneal KM (1994) Using a chlorophyll meter to predict nitrogen fertilizer needs of winter wheat. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 25:171–181. doi:10.1080/00103629409369027
Giunta F, Motzo R, Deidda M (2002) SPAD readings and associated leaf traits in durum wheat, barley and triticale cultivars. Euphytica 125:197–205
Hoel BO, Solhaug KA (1998) Effect of irradiance on chlorophyll estimation with the Minolta SPAD-502 leaf chlorophyll meter. Ann Bot 82:389–392. doi:10.1006/anbo.1998.0683
Houlès V, Guérif M, Mary B (2007) Elaboration of a nitrogen nutrition indicator for winter wheat based on leaf area index and chlorophyll content for making nitrogen recommendations. Eur J Agron 27:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2006.10.001
Islam MR, Haque KMS, Akter N, Karim MA (2014) Leaf chlorophyll dynamics in wheat based on SPAD meter reading and its relationship with grain yield. Sci Agric 4:13–18. doi:10.15192/PSCP.SA.2014.4.1.1318
Křen J, Klem K, Svobodová I, Míša P, Lukas V (2015) Influence of sowing, nitrogen nutrition and weather conditions on stand structure and Yield of spring barley. Cereal Res Commun 43:326–335. doi:10.1556/CRC.2014.0036
Lawlor DW, Lemaire G, Gastal F (2001) Plant nitrogen. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg
Le Bail M, Jeuffroy M-H, Bouchard C, Barbottin A (2005) Is it possible to forecast the grain quality and yield of different varieties of winter wheat from Minolta SPAD meter measurements? Eur J Agron 23:379–391. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2005.02.003
Mary B, Beaudoin N, Benoit M (1997) Prevention of nitrogen pollution in watersheds. In: Lemaire G, Nicolardot B (eds) Controlling nitrogen concentration in agrosystems. Inst natl recherche agronomique, Paris, pp 289–312
Monje OA, Bugbee B (1992) Inherent limitations of nondestructive chlorophyll meters: a comparison of two types of meters. HortScience 27:69–71
Olfs HW, Blankenau K, Brentrup F, Jasper J, Link A, Lammel J (2005) Soil- and plant-based nitrogen-fertilizer recommendations in arable farming. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 168:414–431. doi:10.1002/jpln.200520526
Peng S, Garcia F, Laza R, Cassman K (1993) Adjustment for specific leaf weight improves chlorophyll meters estimate of rice leaf nitrogen concentration. Agron J 85:987–990
Richardson AD, Duigan SP, Berlyn GP (2002) An evaluation of noninvasive methods to estimate foliar chlorophyll content. New Phytol 153:185–194. doi:10.1046/j.0028-646X.2001.00289.x
Snyder CSS, Bruulsema TWW, Jensen TLL, Fixen PEE (2009) Review of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production systems and fertilizer management effects. Agric Ecosyst Environ 133:247–266. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2009.04.021
Szabó É (2014) Effect of some physiological properties on the quality parameters of different winter wheat varieties in a long-term experiment. Cereal Res Commun 42:126–138. doi:10.1556/CRC.2013.0048
Uddling J, Gelang-Alfredsson J, Piikki K, Pleijel H (2007) Evaluating the relationship between leaf chlorophyll concentration and SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter readings. Photosynth Res 91:37–46. doi:10.1007/s11120-006-9077-5
Wang Q, Chen J, Li Y (2004) Nondestructive and rapid estimation of leaf chlorophyll and nitrogen status of peace lily using a chlorophyll meter. J Plant Nutr 27:557–569. doi:10.1081/PLN-120028878
Wang G, Bronson KF, Thorp KR, Mon J, Badaruddin M (2014) Multiple leaf measurements improve effectiveness of chlorophyll meter for durum wheat nitrogen management. Crop Sci 54:817–826. doi:10.2135/cropsci2013.03.0160
Wood CW, Reeves DW, Himelrick DG (1993) Relationships between chlorophyll meter readings and leaf chlorophyll concentration, N status, and crop yield: a review. Proc Agron Soc New Zeal 23:1–9
Xiong D, Chen J, Yu T, Gao W, Ling X, Li Y, Peng S, Huang J (2015) SPAD-based leaf nitrogen estimation is impacted by environmental factors and crop leaf characteristics. Sci Rep 5:1–12. doi:10.1038/srep13389
Yıldırım M, Kılıç H, Kendal E, Karahan T (2010) Applicability of chlorophyll meter readings as yield predictor in durum wheat. J Plant Nutr 34:151–164. doi:10.1080/01904167.2011.533319
Yuan Z, Ata-Ul-Karim ST, Cao Q, Lu Z, Cao W, Zhu Y, Liu X (2016) Indicators for diagnosing nitrogen status of rice based on chlorophyll meter readings. F Crop Res 185:12–20. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2015.10.003
Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res 14:415–421. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.x
Zhao B, Liu Z, Ata-Ul-Karim ST, Xiao J, Liu Z, Qi A, Ning D, Nan J, Duan A (2016) Rapid and nondestructive estimation of the nitrogen nutrition index in winter barley using chlorophyll measurements. F Crop Res 185:59–68. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2015.10.021
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Hungarian Research Fund (Országos Tudományos Kutatási Alap OTKA K101794) and authors would like to thank you to Mónika E. Fehér and Imréné Horváth for their excellent technical assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Monostori, I., Árendás, T., Hoffman, B. et al. Relationship between SPAD value and grain yield can be affected by cultivar, environment and soil nitrogen content in wheat. Euphytica 211, 103–112 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1741-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1741-z