Advertisement

Euphytica

, Volume 205, Issue 2, pp 369–380 | Cite as

Simultaneous selection in beans for architecture, grain yield and minerals concentration

  • Sandra Maria Maziero
  • Nerinéia Dalfollo Ribeiro
  • Lindolfo Storck
Article

Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify the most efficient selection strategy to select common bean lines with erect architecture, high grain yield and high concentration of potassium, phosphorus, zinc and copper in grains. For this purpose, 160 F6:8 common bean lines and nine parents were evaluated in two growing seasons in Santa Maria/RS, Brazil. The tested selection strategies were direct selection, and six different selection indices were used: classic, base, parameters and weight-free, based on desired gains, multiplicative and rank sum. Two economic weights were established: genetic the variation coefficient and 10 % gain in relation to the mean, tested without restriction (weights in all characters) and with restriction (economic weight equal to zero for two minerals). The grain yield was not correlated with the insertion of the first pod; however, it showed low negative correlation with the potassium (r = −0.29), phosphorus (r = −0.41) and zinc concentrations (r = −0.34) at 1 % probability. The direct selection enabled a high selection gain for individual characters, but caused undesirable changes in the other characters under selection. The selection indices were not in agreement in the identification of superior common bean lines and the use restriction was not advantageous in selection. The multiplicative index is the most efficient strategy of simultaneous selection for erect architecture, high grain yield and high potassium, phosphorus and zinc concentrations in grains in common bean lines. L 72, L 97, L 137 and L 146 are the most promising common bean lines and will be selected to compose the preliminary evaluation trial.

Keywords

Phaseolus vulgaris L. Agronomic performance Biofortified lines Direct selection Selection indices Selection gain 

Notes

Acknowledgment

We thank the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) and the National Council of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq) and the for the grants awarded. The authors would also like to thank Mr. Euzébio Maziero for his assistance in conducting experiments.

References

  1. Adams MW (1967) Basis of yield component compensation in crop plants with special reference to the field bean, Phaseolus vulgaris. Crop Sci 7:505–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almeida LM, Viana AP, Amaral Júnior AT, Júnior C, de Barros J (2014) Breeding full-sib families of sugar cane using selection index. Cienc Rural 44:605–611. doi: 10.1590/S0103-84782014000400005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertoldo JG, Barili LD, do Vale NM, Coimbra JLM, Stahelin D, Guidolin AF (2010) Genetic gain in agronomic traits of common bean in the region of Planalto Catarinense. Euphytica 171:381–388. doi: 10.1007/s10681-009-0043-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blair MWJ (2013) Mineral biofortification strategies for food staples: the example of common bean. J Agric Food Chem 61:8287–8294. doi: 10.1021/jf400774y PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Costa MM, Di Mauro AO, Unêda-Trevisoli SH, Arriel NHC, Bárbaro IM, Muniz FRS (2004) Ganho genético por diferentes critérios de seleção em populações segregantes de soja. Pesq Agropec Bras 39:1095–1102. doi: 10.1590/S0100-204X2004001100007 Google Scholar
  6. Cruz CD (1990) Aplicação técnica de análise multivariada no melhoramento de plantas. Monografia, Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”Google Scholar
  7. Cruz CD (2013) Genes - a software package for analysis in experimental statistics and quantitative genetics. Acta Sci Agron 35:271–276. doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v35i3.21251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cruz CD, Carneiro PCS (2006) Modelos biométricos aplicados ao melhoramento genético, 2nd edn. Universidade Federal de Viçosa, ViçosaGoogle Scholar
  9. Cruz CD, Regazzi AJ (1997) Modelos biométricos aplicados ao melhoramento genético. Universidade Federal de Viçosa, ViçosaGoogle Scholar
  10. de Magalhães Bertini CHC, de Almeida WS, da Silva APM, Lima JW, Teófilo EM (2010) Análise multivariada e índice de seleção na identificação de genótipos superiores de feijão-caupi. Acta Sci Agron 32:613–619. doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v32i4.4631 Google Scholar
  11. de Vasconcelos ES, de Ferreira R, Cruz CD, Moreira A, Rassini JB, Freitas AR (2010) Estimativas de ganho genético por diferentes critérios de seleção em genótipos de alfafa. Rev Ceres 57:205–210. doi: 10.1590/S0034-737X2010000200011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elston RC (1963) A weight-free index for the purpose of ranking or selection with respect to several traits at a time. Biometrics 19:85–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Falconer DS (1987) Introdução à genética quantitativa. Imprensa Universitária UFV, ViçosaGoogle Scholar
  14. Franco G (2005) Tabela de composição química dos alimentos, 9th edn. Atheneu, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  15. Hazel LN (1943) The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics 28:476–490PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hazel LN, Lush JL (1942) The efficiency of three methods of selection. J Hered 33:393–399Google Scholar
  17. Jost E, Ribeiro ND, Maziero SM, Possobom MTDF, Rosa DP, da Silva Domingues L (2013) Comparison among direct, indirect and index selections on agronomic traits and nutritional quality traits in common bean. J Sci Food Agric 93:1097–1104. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.5856 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mendes FF, Ramalho MAP, Abreu AFB (2009) Índice de seleção para escolha de populações segregantes de feijoeiro-comum. Pesq Agropec Bras 44:1312–1318. doi: 10.1590/S0100-204X2009001000015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Miyazawa M, Pavan MA, Muraoka T, Carmo CAFS, Mello WJ (1999) Análises químicas de tecido vegetal. In: Silva FC (ed) Manual de análises químicas de solos, plantas e fertilizantes. EMBRAPA Solos, Brasília, pp 171–223Google Scholar
  20. Moura MM, Carneiro PCS, Carneiro JES, Cruz CD (2013) Potencial de caracteres na avaliação da arquitetura de plantas de feijão. Pesq Agropec Bras 48:417–425. doi: 10.1590/S0100-204X2013000400010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mulamba NN, Mock JJ (1978) Improvement of yield potential of the Eto Blanco maize (Zea mays L.) population by breeding for plant traits. Egypt J Genet Cytol 7:40–51Google Scholar
  22. Oliveira TC (2007) Fósforo: função, metabolismo e recomendações. Rev Dig Nut 1:1–24Google Scholar
  23. Pesek J, Baker RJ (1969) Desired improvement in relation to selected indices. Can J Plant Sci 49:803–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pfeiffer WH, Mcclafferty B (2007) HarvestPlus: breeding crops for better nutrition. Crop Sci 47:S88–S105. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2007.09.0020IPBS CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Poersch NL, Ribeiro ND, Rosa DP, Possobom MTDF (2011) Genetic control of potassium content of common bean seeds. Pesq Agropec Bras 46:626–632. doi: 10.1590/S0100-204X2011000600008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Poersch NL, Ribeiro ND, Rosa DP, Maziero SM, Jost E (2013) Genetics of the concentration of copper in common bean seeds. Acta Sci Agron 35:301–306. doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v35i3.16520 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ribeiro ND, Jost E, Cerutti T, Maziero SM, Poersch NL (2008) Composição de microminerais em cultivares de feijão e aplicações para o melhoramento genético. Bragantia 67:267–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ribeiro EH, Pereira MG, de Coelho K, Freitas Júnior SPF (2009) Estimativas de parâmetros genéticos e seleção de linhagens endogâmicas recombinants de feijoeiro comum (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Rev Ceres 56:580–590Google Scholar
  29. Ribeiro ND, Rosa SS, Jost E, Rosa DP, Poersch NL, Maziero SM (2011) Genetics of phosphorus content in common bean seeds. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol 11:250–256. doi: 10.1590/S1984-70332011000300007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ribeiro ND, Mambrin RB, Storck L, Prigol M, Nogueira CW (2013) Combined selection for grain yield, cooking quality and minerals in the common bean. Rev Cienc Agron 44:869–877. doi: 10.1590/S1806-66902013000400025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ribeiro ND, Rodrigues JA, Prigol M, Nogueira CW, Storck L, Gruhn EM (2014) Evaluation of special grains bean lines for grain yield, cooking time and mineral concentrations. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol 14:15–22. doi: 10.1590/S1984-70332014000100003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rosa SS, Ribeiro ND, Jost E, Reiniger LRS, Rosa DP, Cerutti T, Possobom MTDF (2010) Potential for increasing the zinc content in common bean using genetic improvement. Euphytica 175:207–213. doi: 10.1007/s10681-010-0163-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Santos CAF, de Araújo FP (2001) Aplicação de índices para seleção de caracteres agronômicos de feijão-de-corda. Rev Ciênc Agron 32:78–84Google Scholar
  34. Silva HD, Ferreira DF, Pacheco CAP (2000) Avaliação de quatro alternativas de análise de experimentos em látice quadrado, quanto à estimação de componentes de variância. Bragantia 59:117–123. doi: 10.1590/S0006-87052000000100018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Silva JG, Aidar H, Kluthcouski J (2009) Colheita direta de feijão com colhedora automotriz axial. Pesq Agropec Trop 39:371–379Google Scholar
  36. Silva CA, Abreu AFB, Ramalho MAP, Maia LGS (2012) Chemical composition as related to seed color of common bean. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol 12:132–137. doi: 10.1590/S1984-70332012000200006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith HF (1936) A discriminant function for plant selection. Ann Eugen 7:240–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Subandi W, Compton A, Empig LT (1973) Comparison of the efficiencies of selection indices for three traits in two variety crosses of corn. Crop Sci 13:184–186. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1973.0011183X001300020011x Google Scholar
  39. Williams JS (1962) The evaluation of a selection index. Biometrics 18:375–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra Maria Maziero
    • 1
  • Nerinéia Dalfollo Ribeiro
    • 1
  • Lindolfo Storck
    • 1
  1. 1.DF-CCR-UFSMSanta MariaBrazil

Personalised recommendations