Advertisement

Euphytica

, Volume 193, Issue 3, pp 359–367 | Cite as

Molecular changes during intra and inter recurrent selection of two populations of maize: one adapted and one non adapted to the selection environment

  • J. Peña-Asin
  • A. Álvarez
  • B. Ordas
Article

Abstract

In several reciprocal recurrent selection (RRS) programs heterosis and favorable characteristics are achieved by means of one adapted and one non adapted population. We evaluated with molecular markers, an intrapopulation selection followed by RRS of one Spanish population adapted to Mediterranean Spain and one US Corn Belt population non adapted to Spanish conditions. Results from other authors suggest that during recurrent selection, non adapted populations have higher loss of variability, genetic differentiation and lower effective population size than expected according to the number of families selected each generation. This could be due to natural selection which is not under the breeder’s control and is expected to mainly act on non adapted populations. The number of markers with convergent allelic change was similar to the number of markers with divergent allelic change which explains the lack of genetic differentiation and the failure to increase heterosis during RRS because the effects of both types of changes compensate. It seems that the predominant mode of gene action depends on the particular germplasm involved in the RRS. By evaluating the allelic changes during selection, we identified four regions (2.04, 4.06, 6.03, 9.02) that significantly changed during selection in our selection experiment and that have been associated to selection in other selection experiments and to multiple traits in QTL experiments.

Keywords

RRS Variability Genetic diversity Zea mays 

Abbreviations

RRS

Reciprocal recurrent selection

SSR

Simple sequence repeat

LD

Linkage disequilibrium

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Spanish Plan of I+D (project AGL2010-22254-C02-01). Javier Peña-Asín acknowledges a fellowship from the Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain and Bernardo Ordas acknowledges a Parga Pondal postdoctoral contract from the Xunta of Galicia.

Supplementary material

10681_2013_934_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (172 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 171 kb)
10681_2013_934_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (182 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 182 kb)
10681_2013_934_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (172 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 171 kb)

References

  1. Ajmone-Marsan P, Monfredini G, Ludwig WF, Melchinger AE, Franceschini P, Pagnotto G, Motto M (1995) In an elite cross of maize a major quantitative trait locus controls one-fourth of the genetic variation for grain yield. Theor Appl Genet 90:415–424Google Scholar
  2. Álvarez A, Garay G, Jiménez J, Ruíz de Galarreta JI (1993) Heterosis entre dos sintéticos de maíz expresada sobre caracteres morfológicos y reproductivos. Investigación Agraria: Producción y Protección vegetal 8:333–340Google Scholar
  3. Andorf CM, Lawrence CJ, Harper LC, Schaeffer ML, Campbell DA, Sen TZ (2010) The locus lookup tool at MaizeGDB: identification of genomic regions in maize by integrating sequence information with physical and genetic maps. Bioinformatics 26:434–436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beavis W, Smith O, Grant D, Fincher R (1994) Identification of quantitative trait loci using a small sample of topcrossed and F4 progeny from maize. Crop Sci 34:882–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butron A, Tarrio R, Revilla P, Malvar RA, Ordas A (2003) Molecular evaluation of two methods for developing maize synthetic varieties. Mol Breed 12:329–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Butron A, Tarrío R, Revilla P, Ordás A, Malvar RA (2005) Molecular changes in the maize composite EPS12 during selection for resistance to pink stem borer. Theor Appl Genet 110:044–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butruille DV, Silva HD, Kaeppler SM, Coors JG (2004) Response to selection and genetic drift in three populations derived from the Colden Clow maize population. Crop Sci 44:1527–1534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caicedo MB (2010) Obtención de líneas puras en maíz con selección y sin selección: comparación de métodos. Thesis Master of Science, Instituto Agronómico Mediterráneo, Zaragoza, IAMZ-CIHEAMGoogle Scholar
  9. Causse M, Rocher JP, Henry AM, Charcosset A, Prioul JL, Devienne D (1995) Genetic dissection of the relationship between carbon metabolism and early growth in maize, with emphasis on key-enzyme loci. Mol Breed 1:259–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman Group, HarlowGoogle Scholar
  11. Garay G, Igartua E, Álvarez A (1996a) Responses to S1 selection in flint and dent synthetic maize populations. Crop Sci 36:1129–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garay G, Igartua E, Álvarez A (1996b) Combining ability associated with S1 recurrent selection in two maize synthetic. Maydica 41:263–269Google Scholar
  13. Goldman I, Rocheford TR, Dudley JW (1993) Quantitative trait loci influencing protein and starch concentration in the Illinois long term selection maize strains. Theor Appl Genet 87:217–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hinze LL, Kresovich S, Nason JD, Lamkey KR (2005) Population genetic diversity in a maize reciprocal recurrent selection program. Crop Sci 45:2435–2442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ho JC, Kresovich S, Lamkey KR (2005) Extent and distribution of gene tic variation in US maize: historically important lines and their open pollinated dent and flint progenitors. Crop Sci 45:1891–1900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keeratinijakal V, Lamkey KR (1993) Genetic effects associated with reciprocal recurrent selection in BSSS and BSCB1 maize populations. Crop Sci 33:78–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Labate JA, Lamkey KR, Lee M, Woodman WL (1997) Molecular genetic diversity after reciprocal recurrent selection in BSSS and BSCB1 maize populations. Crop Sci 37:416–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Labate JA, Lamkey KR, Lee M, Woodman WL (1999) Temporal changes in allele frequencies in two reciprocally selected maize populations. Theor Appl Genet 99:1166–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Labate JA, Lamkey KR, Lee M, Woodman WL (2000) Hardy–Weinberg and linkage equilibrium estimates in the BSSS and BSCB1 random mated populations. Maydica 45:243–255Google Scholar
  20. Labate JA, Lamkey KR, Mitchell SE, Kresovich S, Sullivan H, Smith JSC (2003) Molecular and historical aspects of corn belt dent diversity. Crop Sci 43:80–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lewis PO, Zaykin D (2001) Genetic Data Analysis: Computer program for the analysis of allelic data. Versión 1.0 (d16c). http://www.eeb.uconn.edu/people/plewis/software.php. Accessed 1 Nov 2012
  22. Liu YG, Whittier RF (1994) Preparation of megabase plant DNA from nuclei in agarose plugs and microbeads. Nucleic Acids Res 22:2168–2169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mikel MA (2011) Genetic diversity and improvement of contemporary proprietary North American dent corn. Crop Sci 48:1686–1695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mikel MA, Dudley JW (2006) Evolution of North American dent corn from public to proprietary germplasm. Crop Sci 46:1193–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nei M (1978) Estimation of average heterozigosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583–590PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Nei M, Tajima F (1981) Genetic drift and estimation of effective population size. Genetics 98:625–640PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ordás A (1991) Heterosis in crosses between American and Spanish populations of maize. Crop Sci 31:931–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Peña-Asin J, Álvarez A, Ordás A, Ordás B (2012) Evaluation of three cycles of full-sib reciprocal recurrent selection in two maize populations from the Northeast of Spain. Euphytica. doi: 10.1007/s10681-012-0856-0 Google Scholar
  29. Pinto LR, Vieira MCL, de Souza CL, de Souza AP (2003) Genetic diversity assessed by microsatellites in tropical maize populations submitted to a high-intensity reciprocal recurrent selection. Euphytica 134:277–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reif JC, Hallauer AR, Melchinger AE (2005) Heterosis and heterotic patterns in maize. Maydica 50:215–223Google Scholar
  31. Reif JC, Warburton ML, Xia XC, Hoisington DA, Crossa J, Taba S, Muminovic J, Bohn M, Frisch M, Melchinger AE (2006) Grouping of accessions of Mexican races of maize revisited with SSR markers. Theor Appl Genet 113:177–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reif JC, Fischer S, Schrag TA, Lamkey KR, Klein D, Dhillon BS, Utz HF, Melchinger AE (2010) Broadening the genetic base of European maize heterotic pools with US corn belt germplasm using field and molecular marker data. Theor Appl Genet 120:301–310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Revilla P, Boyat A, Álvarez A, Gouesnard B, Ordás B, Rodríguez VM, Ordás A, Malvar RA (2006) Contribution of autochthonous maize populations for adaptation to European conditions. Euphytica 152:275–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Romay MC, Ordas B, Revilla P, Ordas A (2011) Three cycles of full-sib reciprocal recurrent selection in two Spanish maize populations. Crop Sci 51:1016–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Romay MC, Butron A, Ordas A, Revilla P, Ordas B (2012) Effect of recurrent selection on the genetic structure of two broad-based populations. Crop Sci 52:1493–1502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. SAS Institute (2008) The SAS system for Windows Release 9.2, SAS Institute Inc, CaryGoogle Scholar
  37. Schaffer HE, Yardley D, Anderson WW (1977) Drift or selection: a statistical test of gene frequency variation over generations. Genetics 87:371–379PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Schön CC, Melchinger AE, Boppenmaier J, Brunklaus-Jung E, Herrmann R, Seitzer JF (1994) RFLP mapping in maize—quantitative trait loci affecting testcross performance of elite European flint lines. Crop Sci 34:378–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schön CC, Dhillon BS, Utz HF, Melchinger AE (2010) High congruency of QTL positions for heterosis of grain yield in three crosses of maize. Theor Appl Genet 120:321–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Solomon KF, Martin I, Zeppa A (2010) Temporal genetic structure patterns under reciprocal recurrent selection. Euphytica 176:239–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sprague GF, Eberhart SA (1977). Corn breeding. pp: 305–362. In: Sprague GF & Dudley JW (ed.). Corn and Corn Improvement. Agronomy Monographies 18. ASA, CSSA, SSSA Madison, WisconsinGoogle Scholar
  42. Stuber CW, Moll RH, Goodman MM, Schaffer HE, Weir BS (1980) Allozyme frequency changes associated with selection for increased grain yield in maize (Zea mays L.). Genetics 95:225–236PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Taller JM, Bernardo R (2004) Diverse adapted populations for improving Northern maize inbreds. Crop Sci 44:1444–1449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Veldboom L, Lee M (1996) Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci in maize in stress and non stress environments II. plant height and flowering. Crop Sci 36:1320–1327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Veldboom LR, Lee M, Woodman WL (1994) Molecular marker-facilitated studies in an elite maize population: I. Linkage analysis and determination of QTL for morphological traits. Theor Appl Genet 88:7–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Walsh B (2004) Population and quantitative genetic models of selection limits. In: Janick J (ed) Plant breeding reviews 24. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  47. Waples RS (1989) A generalized approach for estimating effective population size from temporal changes in allele frequency. Genetics 121:379–391PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Estación Experimental de Aula DeiEEAD-CSICZaragozaSpain
  2. 2.Misión Biológica de GaliciaMBG-CSICPontevedraSpain

Personalised recommendations