Advertisement

Euphytica

, Volume 191, Issue 2, pp 269–277 | Cite as

Genetic interrelationships among medium to late maturing tropical maize inbred lines using selected SSR markers

  • Abera Wende
  • Hussein Shimelis
  • John Derera
  • Worku Mosisa
  • Jedidah Danson
  • Mark D. Laing
Article

Abstract

Understanding the genetic relationships among breeding lines is fundamental in crop improvement programs. The objectives of this study were to apply selected polymorphic single sequence repeat (SSR) DNA markers and cluster medium to late maturing tropical elite maize inbred lines for effective hybrid breeding. Twenty elite inbred lines were genotyped with 20 SSR markers. The analysis detected a total of 108 alleles. The unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean allocated the inbred lines into five clusters consistent with the known pedigrees. The tested inbred lines that were adapted to mid-altitude, sub-humid agro-ecologies were classified in different clusters, except for a few discrepancies. The greatest genetic distance was identified between the clusters of lines CML-202 and Gibe-1-91-1-1-1-1. The analysis determined the genetic grouping present in the source population, which will assist in effective utilization of the lines in tropical hybrid maize breeding programs to exploit heterosis.

Keywords

Genetic diversity Inbred lines SSR markers Tropics Zea mays 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) is sincerely thanked for financial support to initiate the study. The Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR) is acknowledged for providing leave of absence and hosting the field research to the first author. The all round support provided by the national maize research project of Ethiopia is highly appreciated.

References

  1. Ajmone-Marsan P, Castiglioni P, Fusari F, Kuiper M, Motto M (1998) Genetic diversity and its relationship to hybrid performance in maize as revealed by RFLP and AFLP markers. Theor Appl Genet 96:219–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbosa AAM, Geraldi IO, Benchimol LL, Garcia AAF, Souza AP (2003) Relationship of intra- and inter-population tropical maize single cross hybrid performance and genetic distance computed from AFLP and SSR. Euphytica 130:87–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boppenmeier J, Melchinger AE, Brunklaus-Jung E, Geiger HH, Herrmann RG (1992) Genetic diversity for RFLP in European maize inbreds: in Relation to performance of flint × dent crosses for forage traits. Crop Sci 32:895–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Byerlee D, Spielman DJ, Alemu D, Gautam M (2007) Policies to promote cereal intensification in Ethiopia: a review of evidence and experience. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), discussion paper no. 707. IFPRI, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  5. CSA (2010) Agricultural sample survey 2009/2010. Report on farm management practices. Private peasant holdings, Meher season. Statistical Bulletin. Addis Ababa, EthiopiaGoogle Scholar
  6. CSA (2011) Agricultural sample survey 2010/2011. Report on farm management practices. Private peasant holdings, Meher season. Statistical Bulletin. Addis Ababa, EthiopiaGoogle Scholar
  7. Dawit A, Wilfred M, Nigussie M, Spielman DJ (2008) The maize seed system in Ethiopia: challenges and opportunities in drought prone areas. Afr J Agric Res 3:305–314Google Scholar
  8. Doss CR, Mwangi W, Verkuijl H, de Groote H (2003) Adoption of maize and wheat technologies in eastern Africa: a synthesis of the findings of 22 case studies. CIMMYT Economics Working Paper 03–06, CIMMYT, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  9. Dubreuil P, Dufour P, Krejci P, Causse M, Vienne D, Gallais A, Charcosset S (1996) Organization of RFLP diversity among inbred lines of maize representing the most significant heterotic groups. Crop Sci 36:790–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Enoki H, Sato H, Koinuma K (2002) SSR analysis of genetic diversity among maize inbred lines adapted to cold regions of Japan. Theor Appl Genet 104:12070–12133Google Scholar
  11. Fehr WR (1987) Principals of cultivar development: Theory and Technique, vol 1. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Gonzalez S, Cordova H, Rodriguez S, de Leon H, Serrato VM (1997) Determinacion de un patron heterotico a partir de la evaluacion de un dialelo de diez lineas de maiz subtropical. Agron Mesoam 8:1–7Google Scholar
  13. Hallauer AR (1990) Methods used in developing maize inbred. Maydica 35:1–16Google Scholar
  14. Hallauer AR, Lopez-Perez E (1979) Comparisons among testers for evaluating lines of corn. Crop Sci 34:57–75Google Scholar
  15. Hallauer AR, Miranda JB (1988) Quantitative genetics in maize breeding, 2nd edn. Iowa State University Press, AmesGoogle Scholar
  16. Han GC, Vasal SK, Beck DL, Elis E (1991) Combining ability of inbred lines derived from CIMMYT maize (Zea mays L.) germplasm. Maydica 36:57–64Google Scholar
  17. Heckenberger M, Bohn M, Zeigle JS, Joe LK, Hauser JD, Hutten M, Melchinger AE (2002) Variation of DNA fingerprints among accessions within maize inbred lines and implications for identification of essentially derived varieties I. Genetic and technical sources of variation in SSR data. Mol Breed 10:181–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Konstantinov K, Drinic SM (2000) Heterosis in maize molecular markers polymorphism and probability of prediction. In: Quantitative Genetics and Breeding Methods: The Way Ahead, Paris, France, August 30–September 1, 2000, pp.310–312Google Scholar
  19. Lange DA, Penuela S, Denny LR, Mudge J, Concidido VC, Orf JC, Young ND (1998) A plant isolation protocol suitable for polymerase chain reaction based marker-assisted breeding. Crop Sci 138:217–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lanza LLB, de Souza Jr CL, Ottoboni LM, Vieira MLC, de Souza AP (1997) Genetic distance of inbred lines and prediction of maize single cross performance using RAPD markers. Theor Appl Genet 94:1023–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee M, Godshalk EB, Lamkey KR, Woodman WW (1989) Association of restriction fragment length polymorphisms among maize inbreds with agronomic performance of their crosses. Crop Sci 29:1067–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Legesse WB, Myburg AA, Pixley KV, Botha AM (2007) Genetic diversity of maize inbred lines revealed by SSR markers. Hereditas 144:10–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li Y, Du J, Wang T, Shi Y, Song Y, Jia J (2002) Genetic diversity and relationships among Chinese maize inbred lines revealed by SSR markers. Maydica 47:93–101Google Scholar
  24. Lin JJ, Fleming R, Kuo J, Mathews BF, Saunders JA (2000) Detection of plant genes using a rapid, nonorganic DNA purification method. Biotechnology 28:346–350Google Scholar
  25. Livini C, Anjmone-Marsan P, Melchinger AE, Messmer MM, Motto M (1992) Genetic diversity of maize inbred lines within and among heterotic groups revealed by RFLPs. Theor Appl Genet 84:17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mbogori MN, Kimani M, Kuria A, Lagat M, Danson JW (2006) Optimization of FTA technology for large scale plant DNA isolation for use in marker assisted selection. Afr J Biotechnol 5:693–696Google Scholar
  27. Melchinger AE (1999) Genetic diversity and heterosis. In: Coors JG, Pandey S (eds) The genetic and exploitation of heterosis in crops. CSSA, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  28. Melchinger AE, Gumber RK (1998) Overview of heterosis and heterotic groups in agronomic crops. In: Lamkey KR, Staub JE (eds) Concepts and breeding of heterosis in crop plants. CSSA, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  29. Pejic I, Ajmone-Marsan P, Morgante M, Kozumplick P, Castiglioni P, Taramino G, Motto M (1998) Comparative analysis of genetic similarity among maize inbred lines detected by RFLPs, RAPDs, SSRs, and AFLPs. Theor Appl Genet 97:1248–1255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pinto LR, Vieira MLC, de Souza CL, de Souza AP (2003) Genetic diversity assessed by microsatellites in tropical maize population submitted to high-density reciprocal recurrent selection. Euphytica 134:277–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reif JC, Melchinger AE, Xia XC, Warburton ML, Hoisington DA, Vasal SK, Beck D, Bohn M, Frisch M (2003) Use of SSRs for establishing heterotic groups in subtropical maize. Theor Appl Genet 107:947–957PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Senior ML, Heun M (1993) Mapping maize microsatellites and polymerase chain reaction confirmation of the targeted repeats using a CT primer. Genome 36:884–889PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Senior ML, Murphy JP, Goodman MM, Stuber CW (1998) Utility of SSRs for determining genetic similarities and relationships in maize using an agarose gel system. Crop Sci 38:1088–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sibov ST, de Souz CL, Garica AF, Silva AR, Mongolin CA, Benchimol LL, de Souza AP (2003) Molecular mapping in tropical maize (Zea mays L.) using microsatellite markers. Map construction and localization of loci showing distorted segregation. Hereditas 139:96–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith JSC, Chin ECL, Shu H, Smith OS, Wall SJ, Senior ML, Mitchell SE, Kresovitch S, Ziegle J (1997) An evaluation the utility of SSR loci as molecular markers in maize (Zea mays L.): comparison with data from RFLP and pedigree. Theor Appl Genet 95:163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Terron A, Preciado E, Cordova H, Mickelson H, Lopez R (1997) Determinacion del patron heterotico de 30 lineas de maiz derivadas del la poblacion 43 SR del CIMMYT. Agron Mesoam 8:26–34Google Scholar
  37. Van Berloo R (2007) GGT graphical genotypes. Laboratory of plant breeding Wageningen University. The Netherlands. (http://www.dpw.wau.nl/pv/pub/ggt/)
  38. Vaz Patto MC, Satovic Z, Pêgo S, Fevereiro P (2004) Assessing the genetic diversity of Portuguese maize germplasm using microsatellite markers. Euphytica 137:63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Warburton ML, Xianchun X, Crossa J, Franco J, Melchinger AE, Frisch M, Bohn M, Hoisington D (2002) Genetic characterization of CIMMYT inbred maize lines and open pollinated populations using large scale fingerprinting methods. Crop Sci 42:1832–1840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Welz HG, Geigerb HH (2002) Principles of marker-assisted selection 1. Qualitative traits. http://nbpgr.delhi.nic.in/mmarker/s2-1Welz
  41. Xiao J, Li J, Yuan L, McCough SR, Tanks S (1996) Genetic diversity and its relationship to hybrid performance and heterosis as revealed by PCR based markers. Theor Appl Genet 92:637–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yuan LX, Fu JH, Warburton ML, Li XH, Zang S, Khairallah M, Liu X, Peng Z, Li L (2000) Comparison of genetic diversity among maize inbred lines based on RFLPs, SSRs, AFLPs and RAPDs. Acta Genet Sin 27:725–733PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abera Wende
    • 1
    • 3
  • Hussein Shimelis
    • 3
  • John Derera
    • 3
  • Worku Mosisa
    • 2
  • Jedidah Danson
    • 3
  • Mark D. Laing
    • 3
  1. 1.Bako Research CenterWest ShoaEthiopia
  2. 2.CIMMYT-Kenya ICRAF House, United Nations AvenueNairobiKenya
  3. 3.African Center for Crop Improvement, University of KwaZulu-NatalPietermaritzburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations