Evaluation of citrus rootstocks for the high pH, calcareous soils of South Texas
- 247 Downloads
Citrus tristeza virus (CTV) is one of the most devastating disease in areas where sweet orange or grapefruit are budded onto sour orange rootstock. In Texas, the citrus industry is located in the far south of the state in a high pH and calcareous soils region, which makes sour orange the best rootstock option. The Texas industry has been under a threat since the arrival in Florida and Mexico of the most efficient vector of CTV, the Brown Citrus Aphid. In an attempt to find a suitable replacement for sour orange rootstock a field trial was performed to evaluate 10 rootstocks with Rio Red grapefruit scion. Trees on C35 and Carrizo citranges, and Swingle citrumelo became very chlorotic and died. The other rootstocks also showed slight to severe chlorosis but were able to recover. C22 outperformed all rootstocks during the 6 years, producing more than 1.5 times the yield of sour orange, and ≈2-fold the production of Goutou which was the rootstock with the lowest production. Although significantly lower than C22, the cumulative production of trees on C57 and C146 rootstocks were excellent and their yearly fruit productions were similar to that of C22 in four (2001, 2003, 2004, and 2005) out of the 6 years of study. All three rootstocks originated from the same cross (Sunki mandarin × Swingle trifoliate orange). In all years, sour orange rootstock yielded the highest percentage of soluble solids (SS) and Troyer and Goutou rootstocks the lowest. Although the SS varied with rootstocks, the ratio of the SS and the percentage of acid did not significantly vary with rootstock type. Considering that C22, C57, and C146 are tolerant to CTV and other important diseases, these rootstocks are good options to replace Sour orange in Texas.
KeywordsCitrus tristeza virus Brown citrus aphid Salinity Sour orange Grapefruit
The authors would like to thank the Texas Citrus Producers Board for funding the research and to Mr Paul Heller from Rio Queen Farms for the permission to use the plot area and the support with the grove caretaking and size determination.
- Bitters WP (1972) Reaction of some new citrus hybrids and citrus introductions as rootstocks to inoculations with tristeza virus in California. Proc 5th Int Org Citrus Virol 1:112–120Google Scholar
- Bitters WP, McCarty DC, Cole DA (1973) An evaluation of some new citrus rootstocks with respect to their reaction to tristeza virus. Proc First World Congr Citriculture 2:557–563Google Scholar
- Da Graça JV, Setamou M, Skaria M, French JV (2007) Arthropod vectors of exotic citrus diseases: a risk assessment for the Texas Citrus Industry. Subtr Plant Sci 59:64–74Google Scholar
- Halbert SE, Gene H, Cevic B, Brown LG, Rosales IM, Manjunath KL, Pomerinke M, Davison DA, Lee RF, Niblett CL (2004) Distribution and characterization of Citrus tristeza virus in South Florida following establishment of Toxoptera citricida. Plant Dis 88:935–941Google Scholar
- Hardy N (1995) Brown citrus aphid found in Ft. Lauderdale. Citrus Ind 76:31Google Scholar
- Jacobs JL (1981) Soil survey of Hidalgo County, Texas. Index to map unit 26 p. 32Google Scholar
- Powell CA, Pelosi RR, Burton MS, Rundell PA, Ritenour MA, Bullock RC (2005) Natural field spread of decline and nondecline inducing isolates of Citrus tristeza virus in Florida after the introduction of the Brown citrus aphid. HortScience 40:691–693Google Scholar
- SAS Institute Inc (1999) SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 8. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
- Solís-Gracia N, Kahlke CJ, Herron CM, da Graça JV, Essau KL, Miao HQ, Skaria M (2001) Survey for Citrus tristeza virus in Texas 1991–2000. Subtrop Plant Sci 53:4–8Google Scholar
- Spiegel-Roy P, Goldschmidt EE (1996) Breeding aims. In: biology of citrus—biology of horticultural crops. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, p 201Google Scholar
- Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical Analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar