Stability analysis for bollworm complex in Gossypium hirsutum L.
- 85 Downloads
One approach to improve cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yield is to identify stable genotypes for low or no bollworms damage as it accounts low cost of cultivation to a considerable extent. The objective of the study was to identify stable genotypes for low bollworms damage under protected and unprotected experiments. Fifty cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) genotypes were evaluated for open bollworms damage percent (spotted, pink and Heliothis bollworms) for 3 years during 2003–2005 under protected and unprotected conditions. Variance due to genotypes, environments, genotype × environment and genotype × environment (linear) components were highly significant for the trait in protected and unprotected experiments. Under protected experiment, genotypes CSH 3020 and 3045 were found to be desirable and stable while genotype CSH 3058 was suited for poor environments. Fourteen genotypes viz. CSH 3034, 3035, 3043, 3044, 3047, 3051, 3053, 3058, 3059, 3094, 3106, 3114, 3123 and CSH-3157 were fairly stable under unprotected environments. The study lead to the conclude that in general for the two experiments the genotypes differed for stability for low bollworms damage.
KeywordsMean square deviation Protected Regression coefficient Unprotected
- Bhat MG, Kohel RJ, Altman DW (1990) A study on host plant resistance to bollworms (Heliothis spp.) in cotton using tissue isogenic lines. J Cotton Res Dev 3:140–146Google Scholar
- Culp TW, Hopkins AR, Taft HM (1979) Breeding insect resistant cottons in South Carolina Agricultural Experiment station Technical Bulletin 1074, Clemson, 11 ppGoogle Scholar
- Grover A, Pental D (2003) Breeding objectives and requirements for producing transgenics for major field crops of India. Curr Sci 84:310–320Google Scholar
- Gupta SC, Ndoye AT (1991) Yield stability analysis of promising pearl millet genotypes in Senegal. Maydica 36:83–86Google Scholar
- Mather K, Jinks JL (1982) Biometrical genetics. Chapman Hall Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
- Nizam JR, Shroff VN, Patel VG, Dahholkar AR (1988) Phenotypic stability of single and three way hybrids of cotton with respect of their yield components. J Indian Soc Cotton Improv 13:118–123Google Scholar
- Pund MM, Dev DV (2006) Stability of yield and other quantitative traits in upland cotton. J Cotton Res Dev 28(2):181–184Google Scholar
- Ramachandran K, Joshi LS, Menon CB (1980) The cost of cotton pest control in India. Outlook Agric 10:208–209Google Scholar
- Tuteja OP, Singh DP, Chabra BS (1999a) Phenotypic stability for yield and its component traits in Asiatic cotton hybrids. J Indian Soc Cotton Improv 24(1):10–13Google Scholar
- Tuteja OP, Singh DP, Chabra BS (1999b) Genotype × environment interaction on yield and quality traits of Asiatic cotton (Gossypium arboreum). Indian J Agric Sci 69(3):220–223Google Scholar
- Tuteja OP, Singh M, Verma SK (2006) Stability analysis for seed cotton yield and its component traits in intrahirsutum hybrids of Gossypium. J Cotton Res Dev 20(2):171–173Google Scholar