Advertisement

Euphytica

, Volume 161, Issue 3, pp 313–318 | Cite as

Stability analysis for bollworm complex in Gossypium hirsutum L.

  • Shankar Lal Ahuja
  • P. Jeyakumar
  • L. S. Dhayal
Article
  • 85 Downloads

Abstract

One approach to improve cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yield is to identify stable genotypes for low or no bollworms damage as it accounts low cost of cultivation to a considerable extent. The objective of the study was to identify stable genotypes for low bollworms damage under protected and unprotected experiments. Fifty cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) genotypes were evaluated for open bollworms damage percent (spotted, pink and Heliothis bollworms) for 3 years during 2003–2005 under protected and unprotected conditions. Variance due to genotypes, environments, genotype × environment and genotype × environment (linear) components were highly significant for the trait in protected and unprotected experiments. Under protected experiment, genotypes CSH 3020 and 3045 were found to be desirable and stable while genotype CSH 3058 was suited for poor environments. Fourteen genotypes viz. CSH 3034, 3035, 3043, 3044, 3047, 3051, 3053, 3058, 3059, 3094, 3106, 3114, 3123 and CSH-3157 were fairly stable under unprotected environments. The study lead to the conclude that in general for the two experiments the genotypes differed for stability for low bollworms damage.

Keywords

Mean square deviation Protected Regression coefficient Unprotected 

References

  1. Allard RW, Bradshaw AD (1964) Implications of genotype–environmental interactions in applied plant breeding. Crop Sci 4:503–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker HB, Leon J (1988) Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breed 101:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhat MG, Kohel RJ, Altman DW (1990) A study on host plant resistance to bollworms (Heliothis spp.) in cotton using tissue isogenic lines. J Cotton Res Dev 3:140–146Google Scholar
  4. Culp TW, Hopkins AR, Taft HM (1979) Breeding insect resistant cottons in South Carolina Agricultural Experiment station Technical Bulletin 1074, Clemson, 11 ppGoogle Scholar
  5. Eberhart SA, Russell WA (1966) Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci 6:36–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Finlay KW, Wilkinson GN (1963) The analysis of adaptation in plant breeding programmes. Aust J Agric Res 14:742–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grover A, Pental D (2003) Breeding objectives and requirements for producing transgenics for major field crops of India. Curr Sci 84:310–320Google Scholar
  8. Gupta SC, Ndoye AT (1991) Yield stability analysis of promising pearl millet genotypes in Senegal. Maydica 36:83–86Google Scholar
  9. Hebert Y, Plamion C, Harzic N (1995) Genotype × environment interaction for root traits in maize as analysed with factorial regression models. Euphytica 81:85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jones JE, Dickson JI, Burris E, Clower DF, Caldwell WD, Marshall JG, Stringer SJ (1988) Registration of three insect resistant cotton germplasm lines. Crop Sci 28:200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mather K, Jinks JL (1982) Biometrical genetics. Chapman Hall Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Murray JC, Verhalen LM (1970) Genotype × environment interaction study of cotton in Okalhoma. Crop Sci 10:197–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nizam JR, Shroff VN, Patel VG, Dahholkar AR (1988) Phenotypic stability of single and three way hybrids of cotton with respect of their yield components. J Indian Soc Cotton Improv 13:118–123Google Scholar
  14. Paroda RS, Hays JD (1971) Investigation of genotype–environment interactions for rate of ear emergence in spring barley. Heredity 26:157–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pham HN, Kang MS (1988) Interrelationships among respectability of several stability statistics estimated from international maize trials. Crop Sci 28:925–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pund MM, Dev DV (2006) Stability of yield and other quantitative traits in upland cotton. J Cotton Res Dev 28(2):181–184Google Scholar
  17. Ramachandran K, Joshi LS, Menon CB (1980) The cost of cotton pest control in India. Outlook Agric 10:208–209Google Scholar
  18. Tuteja OP, Singh DP, Chabra BS (1999a) Phenotypic stability for yield and its component traits in Asiatic cotton hybrids. J Indian Soc Cotton Improv 24(1):10–13Google Scholar
  19. Tuteja OP, Singh DP, Chabra BS (1999b) Genotype × environment interaction on yield and quality traits of Asiatic cotton (Gossypium arboreum). Indian J Agric Sci 69(3):220–223Google Scholar
  20. Tuteja OP, Singh M, Verma SK (2006) Stability analysis for seed cotton yield and its component traits in intrahirsutum hybrids of Gossypium. J Cotton Res Dev 20(2):171–173Google Scholar
  21. Virk DS, Chahal SS, Pooni HS (1985) Repeatability of stability estimators of downy mildew in pearl millet. Theor Appl Genet 70:102–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shankar Lal Ahuja
    • 1
  • P. Jeyakumar
    • 1
  • L. S. Dhayal
    • 1
  1. 1.Central Institute for Cotton Research Regional StationSirsaIndia

Personalised recommendations