, Volume 158, Issue 1–2, pp 153–165 | Cite as

Diallel analysis of floral morphology in radish (Raphanus sativus L.)

  • Kiwa Kobayashi
  • Atsushi Horisaki
  • Satoshi Niikura
  • Ryo Ohsawa


We made a 5 × 5 diallel set of crosses between five inbred lines, four Japanese and one Chinese, and diallel analyses of radish floral morphology were conducted to estimate the genetic parameters underlying 13 floral traits. The modes of inheritance of 12 traits (but not anther length on the long stamen) followed the additive-dominance model. Broad-sense heritabilities of the 12 traits were 0.93–0.99, suggesting that floral morphology is highly heritable. But narrow-sense heritabilities differed among traits, ranging from 0.34 to 0.89. Pistil and stamen heights, tube length, and stigma position were explained mainly by additive effects, but anther, stigma, petal, and whole flower sizes were affected greatly by dominance effects as well as by additive effects. The correlations between the 13 traits suggested that some floral traits (e.g. stigma size and position) are more or less independent, indicating the possibility of creating lines with new floral morphologies by selecting for these genetically independent traits. A flower with a larger and higher stigma might improve the production of cross-pollinated seeds through enhancement of pollination efficiency. In that case, by selecting for stigma position in an early segregating generation and for stigma size in a later generation, it should be possible to produce new parental lines with effective floral morphology for F 1 seed production.


Diallel analysis Floral morphology Mode of inheritance Pollination efficiency Radish Raphanus sativus L. 



We thank Dr Y. Ukai, a former professor at the University of Tokyo, for valuable advice on the analyses and for fruitful comments on this article, and Dr S. Matsuura, of the Tohoku Seed Company, for useful comments on this study. This work was supported by a grant for a Research Project for Utilizing Advanced Technology in Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries from the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan and by a Grant-in-Aid for Exploratory Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.


  1. Andersson S (1996) Floral variation in Saxifraga granulata: phenotypic selection, quantitative genetics and predicted response to selection. Heredity 77:217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashman TL, Majetic CJ (2006) Genetic constraints on floral evolution: a review and evaluation of patterns. Heredity 96:343–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Campbell DR, Waser NM, Price MV (1994) Indirect selection of stigma position in Ipomopsis aggregata via a genetically correlated trait. Evolution 48:55–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coen ES, Meyerowitz EM (1991) The war of the whorls: genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature 353:31–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Conner JK, Via S (1993) Patterns of phenotypic and genetic correlations among morphological and life-history traits in wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum. Evolution 47:704–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Conner JK, Franks R, Stewart C (2003) Expression of additive genetic variances and covariances for wild radish floral traits: comparison between field and greenhouse environments. Evolution 57:487–495PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Elle E, Hare JD (2002) Environmentally induced variation in floral traits affects the mating system in Datura wrightii. Funct Ecol 16:79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Falconer DS (1989) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 3rd edn. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Hayman BI (1954) The theory and analysis of diallel crosses. Genetics 39:789–809PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Horisaki A, Tanaka N, Niikura S (2003) The effectiveness of insect-pollination test to evaluate the level of self-incompatibility and their genetic analysis in radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Theor Appl Genet 107:1009–1013PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Iwata H, Niikura S, Matsuura S et al (2000) Diallel analysis of root shape of Japanese radish (Raphanus sativus L.) based on elliptic Fourier descriptors. Breed Sci 50:73–80Google Scholar
  12. Iwata H, Niikura S, Matsuura S et al (2004) Genetic control of root shape at different growth stages in radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Breed Sci 54:117–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones RM (1965) Analysis of variance of the half diallel table. Heredity 20:117–121Google Scholar
  14. Juenger T, Perez-Perez JM, Bernal S et al (2005) Quantitative trait loci mapping of floral and leaf morphology traits in Arabidopsis thaliana: evidence for modular genetic architecture. Evol Dev 7:259–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kitamura S (1958) Daikon no hinsyu to sono hensen (varieties of radish and transitions between them). In: Nishiyama I (ed) Nihon no daikon (Japanese radish). Nihongakujyutsu Sinkoukai, Tokyo, pp 1–19Google Scholar
  16. Kobayashi K, Horisaki A, Niikura S et al (2006) Inter-accession variation in floral morphology in radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Euphytica 152:87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mather K, Jinks JL (1982) Chapter 9, Diallels. In Biometrical Genetics, 3rd edn. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 255–291Google Scholar
  18. Nishiyama I, Nei M, Miyaji Y et al. (1958) Idengaku-teki kenkyu (Genetical studies). In: Nishiyama I (ed) Nihon no daikon (Japanese radish). Nihongakujyutsu Shinkokai, Tokyo, pp 98–131Google Scholar
  19. Richards AJ (1997) Plant Breeding Systems, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Robertson A.W, Diaz A, Macnair MR (1994) The quantitative genetics of floral characters in Mimulus guttatus. Heredity 72:300–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schemske DW, Bradshaw HD (1999) Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:11910–11915PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ukai Y (1989) A microcomputer program DIALL for diallel analysis of quantitative characters. Jpn J Breed 39:107–109Google Scholar
  23. Ukai Y (2002) Ryouteki keishitsu no idenkaiseki [Genetic analysis of quantitative traits]. Igaku-shuppan, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  24. Yang CF, Guo YH, Gituru RW et al. (2002) Variation in stigma morphology: How does it contribute to pollination adaptation in Pedicularis (Orobanchaceae)? Plant Syst Evol 236:89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Young HJ, Stanton ML (1990) Influences of floral variation on pollen removal and seed production in wild radish. Ecology 71:536–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Young HJ, Stanton ML, Ellstrand NC et al. (1994) Temporal and spatial variation in heritability and genetic correlations among floral traits in Raphanus sativus, wild radish. Heredity 73:298–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kiwa Kobayashi
    • 1
  • Atsushi Horisaki
    • 2
  • Satoshi Niikura
    • 2
  • Ryo Ohsawa
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Life and Environmental SciencesUniversity of TsukubaTsukubaJapan
  2. 2.Tohoku Seed CompanyUtsunomiyaJapan

Personalised recommendations