Advertisement

Euphytica

, Volume 157, Issue 1–2, pp 59–68 | Cite as

Inheritance of ‘domestication’ traits in bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.)

  • Shravani Basu
  • Sean Mayes
  • Michael Davey
  • Jeremy A. Roberts
  • Sayed N. Azam-Ali
  • Richard Mithen
  • Remy S. Pasquet
Article

Abstract

Controlled crosses in bambara groundnut were attempted between a range of thirty-six bambara groundnut landraces (thirty domesticated (V. subterranea var. subterranea) and six wild (V. subterranea var. spontanea)). Ten F1 seed were produced. Of these, eight germinated producing F2 populations. On seed set, four populations could be unambiguously confirmed as true crosses by F3 seed coat colour. A single F2 population, derived from a domesticated landrace from Botswana (DipC; female parent) crossed with a wild accession collected in Cameroon (VSSP11; male parent) was used to study a range of agronomic and domestication traits. These included; days to emergence, days to flowering, internode (fourth) length at harvest, number of stems per plant, leaf area, Specific Leaf Area (SLA), Carbon Isotope Discrimination (CID), 100 seed weight, testa colour and eye pattern around the hilum. On the basis of variation for internode length and stems per plant, 14 small F3 families were selected and grown under field conditions to further investigate the genetic basis of the ‘spreading’ versus ‘bunched’ plant character, a major difference between wild and cultivated bambara groundnut. Results presented suggest that traits including leaf area, SLA, CID and 100 seed weight are controlled by several genes. In contrast, the variation for traits such as internode length, stems per plant, days to emergence and seed eye pattern around the hilum are likely to be under largely monogenic control. The results of this work are discussed in relation to the domestication of bambara groundnut.

Keywords

Bambara groundnut Domestication Landraces Plant breeding Trait inheritance Vigna subterranea 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the provision of CID data from the individual F2 samples by Prof. M. S. Sheshshayee, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore

References

  1. Basu SM, Roberts JA, Davey MR, Azam-Ali SN, Mithen RF (2003) Towards genetic linkage mapping in Bambara groundnut. In: Proceedings of the international bambara groundnut symposium in Gaborone, Botswana, 8–12 August 2003, pp 211–222Google Scholar
  2. Brough SH, Azam-Ali SN (1992) The effect of soil moisture on the proximate composition of bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc). J Sci Food Agric 60:197–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Condon AG, Richards RA, Rebetske GJ et al (2004) Breeding for high water-use-efficiency. J Exp Bot 55:2447–2460PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coudert MJ (1982) Market openings in West Africa for cowpeas and bambara groundnuts. Int Trade Technol X:147–241Google Scholar
  5. Doebley J, Stec A, Wendel J et al (1990) Genetic and morphological analysis of a maize-teosinte F2 population: Implications for the origin of maize. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 87:9888–9892PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ehleringer JR, Osmond CB (1989) Stable isotopes. In: Pearcy RW, Ehleringer J, Mooney HA, Rundel PW (eds) Plant physiological ecology: field methods and instrumentation. Chapman & Hall, London, UK, pp 281–300Google Scholar
  7. Farquhar GD, Richards RA (1984) Isotopic composition of plant carbon correlates with water-use efficiency of wheat genotypes. Aust J Plant Physiol 11:539–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Frahm-Leliveld JA (1953) Some chromosome numbers in tropical leguminous plants. Euphytica 2:46–48Google Scholar
  9. Harlan JR (1992) Crops and Man. Madison, Wisconsin, USAGoogle Scholar
  10. Hepper FN (1963) Plants of the 1957–58 West Africa expedition II: the bambara groundnut (Voandzeia subterranea) and Kersting’s groundnut (Kerstingiella geocarpa) wild in West Africa. Kew Bulletin 16:395–407Google Scholar
  11. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI) and International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) (2000) Descriptors for bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea): BAMNET (The international bambara groundnut network). IITA, KenyaGoogle Scholar
  12. Linnemann AR (1990) Cultivation of bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc) in Western province, Zambia. Report of a field study. Tropical Crops Communication No. 16. Department of Tropical Crop Science, Wageningen Agricultural UniversityGoogle Scholar
  13. Linnemann AR (1994) Photothermal regulation of phenological development and growth in bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.). PhD. Dissertation, Wageningen Agricultural University, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  14. Linnemann AR, Azam-Ali SN (1993) Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.). In: Williams JT (ed) Underutilised crops: pulses and vegetables. Chapman Hall, London, UK, pp 13–58Google Scholar
  15. Massawe FJ, Schenkel W, Basu S et al (2004) Artificial hybridisation in bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.). In: conference proceedings of the international bambara groundnut symposium, 5-12 September 2003, Gaborone, Botswana, pp 193–209Google Scholar
  16. Massawe FJ, Dickinson M, Roberts JA et al (2002) Genetic diversity in bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc) landraces revealed by AFLP markers. Genome 45:1175–1180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ntundu WH, Bach IC, Christiasen JC, Andresen SB (2004) Analysis of genetic diversity in Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterrea (L) Verdc.) landraces using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers. Afr J Biotech 3(4):220–225Google Scholar
  18. Obagwu J (2003) Evaluation of bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc) lines for reaction to Cercospora spot. J Sus Agric 22(1):93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pasquet RS, Schwedes S, Gepts P (1999) Isozyme Diversity in bambara groundnut. Crop Sci 39:1228–1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pasquet RS, Fotso M (1997) The ORSTOM bambara groundnut collection. In: Heller J, Begemann F, Mushonga J (eds) Bambara groundnut Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc. IPGRI, Rome, pp 119–123Google Scholar
  21. Rassel A (1960) Le voandzou Voandzeia subterranea Thouars et sa culture au Kwango. Bull Agr Congo Belge Ruanda-Urundi 51–1:1–26Google Scholar
  22. Paterson AH (2002) What has QTL mapping taught us about plant domestication? New Phytologist 154:591–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Peng J, Ronin Y, Fahima T et al (2002) Domestication quantitative trait loci in Triticum dicoccoides, the progenitor of wheat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(5):2489–2494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Salamini et al (2002) Genetics and geography of wild cereal domestication in the near east. Nat Rev Genet 3:429–441PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Swanevelder CJ (1998) Bambara groundnut. Department of Agriculture, Pretoria, Republic of South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  26. Sellschope JPF (1962) Cowpeas, Vigna unguiculata (L.) walp. Field Crop Abstr 15:259–266Google Scholar
  27. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1989) Statistical methods. Iowa State University Press, Ames, USAGoogle Scholar
  28. Stephens MA (1974) EDF statistics for goodness of fit and some comparisons. J Amer Statist Ass 69:730–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zeven AC (1998) Landraces: a review of definitions and classifications. Euphytica 104:127–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shravani Basu
    • 1
  • Sean Mayes
    • 1
  • Michael Davey
    • 1
  • Jeremy A. Roberts
    • 1
  • Sayed N. Azam-Ali
    • 1
  • Richard Mithen
    • 2
  • Remy S. Pasquet
    • 3
  1. 1.School of BiosciencesUniversity of NottinghamLoughboroughUK
  2. 2.Plant Food For Health ProtectionInstitute of Food ResearchNorwichUK
  3. 3.ICIPE - IRDNairobiKenya

Personalised recommendations