Advertisement

Euphytica

, Volume 149, Issue 3, pp 281–287 | Cite as

Transmission of Verticillium wilt resistance to tetraploid potato via unilateral sexual polyploidization

  • K. E. Frost
  • S. H. Jansky
  • D. I. Rouse
Article

Summary

Verticillium wilt is a serious disease of potato and is caused by the soil-borne fungi Verticillium dahliae and V. albo-atrum. No major cultivar is resistant to this disease. Two diploid interspecific potato clones, C287 and C545, were previously identified with consistently high levels of Verticillium wilt resistance and are thought to have the same genotype for the loci that confer resistance to V. dahliae stem colonization. The purpose of this study was to determine whether resistance to V. dahliae stem colonization could be transferred to the tetraploid level in potato via unilateral sexual polyploidization (USP). Progenies in eight families obtained by crossing C287 and C545 to two tetraploid breeding clones, S438 and S440, and the cultivar ‘Atlantic’ were planted in a V. dahliae-infested field and a field without a significant V. dahliae infestation. Resistance was evaluated relative to C545 and C287. There were differences among families for stem colonization and yield. No differences between the mean stem colonization of C545 and C287 progeny were detected. Family differences due to the tetraploid parents indicate that they contributed resistance to the progeny. Stem colonization data from this experiment were consistent with the proposed complementary two-gene model for Verticillium wilt resistance in the diploid parents. Unilateral sexual polyploidization is an effective method for transferring V. dahliae stem colonization resistance to the tetraploid level.

Key words

early dying disease Solanum Verticillium dahliae 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akeley, R.V., F.J. Stevenson, D. Folson & R. Bonde, 1956. Breeding varieties of potato resistant to Verticillium wilt in Maine. Am Potato J 33: 15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Butterfield, E.J. & J.E. DeVay, 1977. Reassessment of soil assays for Verticillium dahliae. Phytopathology 67: 1073–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Concibido, V.C., G.A. Secor & S.H. Jansky, 1994. Evaluation of resistance to Verticillium wilt resistance in diploid, wild potato interspecific hybrids. Euphytica 76: 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Corsini, D.L., J.J. Pavek & J.R. Davis, 1988. Verticillium wilt resistance in noncultivated tuber-bearing Solanum species. Plant Dis 72: 148–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davis, J.R., 1981. Verticillium wilt of potato in southeastern Idaho. In University of Idaho Current Information Series Number 564.Google Scholar
  6. DeJong, H., L.M. Kawchuk, W.K. Coleman, C.A. Verhaeghe, L. Russell, V.J. Burns & E. Tremblay-Deveau, 2001. Development and characterization of an adapted form of droopy, a diploid potato mutant deficient in abscisic acid. Am J Potato Res 78(4): 279–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hermundstad, S. & S.J. Peloquin, 1986. Tuber yield and tuber traits of haploid-wild species F1 hybrids. Potato Res 29: 289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Herriott, A.B., J.F.L. Haynes & P.B. Shoemaker, 1990. Inheritance of resistance to early blight in tetraploid× diploid crosses of potatoes. Hortscience 25(2): 224–226.Google Scholar
  9. Hougas, R.W. & S.J. Peloquin, 1960. Crossability of Solanum tuberosum haploids with diploid Solanum species. Eur Potato J 3: 325–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hunter, D.E., H.M. Darling, F.J. Stevenson & C.E. Cunningham, 1968. Inheritance of resistance to Verticillium in Wisconsin. Am Potato J 45: 72–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Iwanaga, M., P. Jatala, R. Ortiz & E. Guevara, 1989. Use of FDR 2n pollen to transfer resistance to root-knot nematodes into cultivated 4x potatoes. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 114(6): 1008–1013.Google Scholar
  12. Jansky, S.H., P.J. Kauth & D.I. Rouse, 2004. Inheritance of resistance to Verticillium dahliae in diploid interspecific potato hybrids. Plant Dis 88(10): 1075–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jansky, S.H. & D.I. Rouse, 2000. Identification of potato interspecific hybrids resistant to Verticillium wilt and determination of criteria for resistance assessment. Potato Res 43: 413–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jansky, S.H. & D.I. Rouse, 2003. Multiple disease resistance in interspecific hybrids of potato. Plant Dis 87: 266–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lynch, D.R., L.M. Kawchuk, J. Hachey, P.S. Bains & R.J. Howard, 1997. Identification of a gene conferring high levels of resistance to Verticillium wilt in Solanum chacoense. Plant Dis 81: 1011–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marks, G.E., 1966. The origin and significance of intraspecific polyploidy: experimental evidence from Solanum chacoense. Evolution 20: 552–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McLean, J.G., 1955. Selecting and breeding potatoes for field resistance to Verticillium wilt in Idaho. Idaho Agricultural Experiment Station Research Bulletin 30: 1–19.Google Scholar
  18. Mendiburu, A.O. & S.J. Peloquin, 1976. Sexual polyploidization and depolyploidization: Some terminology and definitions. Theor Appl Genet 48: 137–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Murphy, A.M., H.D. Jong & G.C.C. Tai, 1995. Transmission of resistance to common scab from the diploid to the tetraploid level via 4x× 2x crosses in potatoes. Euphytica 82: 227–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ortiz, R., 1998. Potato breeding via ploidy manipulations. Plant Breed Rev 16: 15–86.Google Scholar
  21. R-Development-Core-Team, 2004. R: A language and environment for statistical computing 1.7. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
  22. Rouse, D.I., 1985. Some approaches to prediction of potato early dying disease severity. Am Potato J 62: 187–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rowe, R.C., 1985. Potato early dying: a serious threat to the potato industry. Am Potato J 62: 157–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rowe, R.C., J.R. Davis, M.L. Powelson & D.I. Rouse, 1987. Potato early dying: causal agents and management strategies. Plant Dis 71: 482–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sanford, J.C. & R.E. Hanneman, Jr, 1979. Reciprocal differences in the photoperiod reaction of hybrid populations in Solanum tuberosum. Am Potato J 56: 531–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tung, P.X., E.T. Rasco, P. Vander Zaag, Jr. & P. Schmiediche, 1990. Resistance to Pseudomonas solanacearum in the potato: 1. Effects of sources of resistance and adaptation. Euphytica 45: 203–210.Google Scholar
  27. Watanabe, K., H.M. El-Nashaar & M. Iwanaga, 1992. Transmission of bacterial wilt resistance by First Division Restitution (FDR) 2n pollen via 4x× 2x crosses in potatoes. Euphytica 60: 21–26.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. E. Frost
    • 1
  • S. H. Jansky
    • 2
  • D. I. Rouse
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant PathologyUniversity of Wisconsin – MadisonMadison53706USA
  2. 2.Department of HorticultureUSDA – ARS and University of Wisconsin – MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations