, Volume 141, Issue 3, pp 281–290 | Cite as

Trifluralin-mediated polyploidization of Rosa chinensis minima (Sims) Voss seedlings

  • David C. Zlesak
  • Christian A. Thill
  • Neil O. Anderson


Many diploid rose species and cultivars possess valuable traits that can be introgressed into modern tetraploid cultivars. Interspecific, interploidy crosses are possible, but triploid hybrids typically have limited fertility, hindering further breeding and selection. Tetraploidizing diploids before mating with tetraploids can alleviate fertility barriers. The efficiency of trifluralin was investigated for polyploidization of Rosa chinensis minima (2n = 2x = 14) seedlings. Treatments were trifluralin at 0.086% and 0.0086%, colchicine (0.5%), and distilled water and contained 2% dimethyl sulfoxide and a surfactant. Approximately 5 μl of the treatment solution was applied to the apical meristem of seedlings (N = 337, 82–85 per treatment) in the process of cotyledon expansion. Guard cell length, pollen diameter, and root tip squashes of rooted cuttings were used to detect polyploidy in meristematic layer (L)I, LII, and LIII, respectively. Trifluralin (0.086%) was the most effective treatment for polyploidization (LI 20.2%, LII 12.9%, LIII 12.9%), followed by trifluralin (0.0086%) (LI 10.6%, LII 7.1%, LIII 4.7%) and colchicine (LI 2.4%, LII 0%, LIII 0%). Polyploidization consistently occurred from LI inward. Polyploids as a group had reduced pollen stainability and a lower leaflet length to width ratio than diploids. In addition, two diploid seedlings were identified which produce 2n pollen. Considerations in selecting germplasm and generating somatically-induced polyploids from seedlings versus clones for use in breeding are discussed.


2n gametes chromosome doubling colchicine polyploidy rose trifluralin 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bartels, P.G. & J.L. Hilton, 1973. Comparison of trifluralin, oryzalin, pronamide, propham and colchicines treatments on microtubules. Pest biochem physiol 3: 462–472.Google Scholar
  2. Basye, R.E., 1990. An amphidiploid of Rosa banksiae and Rosa laevigata induced by colchicine. Amer Rose Ann 75: 83–87.Google Scholar
  3. Blakeslee, A.F. & A.G. Avery, 1937. Methods of inducing doubling of chromosomes in plants by treatment with colchicine. J Hered 28: 393–411.Google Scholar
  4. Cairns, T. (Ed.), 2000. Modern Roses XI, The World Encyclopedia of Roses, Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  5. Crespel, L., S. Gudin, J. Meynet & D. Zhang, 2002. AFLP-based estimation of 2 n gametophytic heterozygosity in two parthenogenetically derived dihaploids of Rosa hybrida L. Theor Appl Genet 104: 451–456.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Eeckhaut, T.G.R., S.P.O. Werbrouck, L.W.H. Leus, E.J. Van Bockstaele & P.C. Debergh, 2004. Chemically induced polyploidization in Spathiphyllum wallisii Regel through somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 78: 241–246.Google Scholar
  7. Eigsti, O.L. & P. Dustin, Jr., 1957. Colchicine – In agriculture, medicine, biology, and chemistry. The Iowa State College Press, Ames.Google Scholar
  8. El Mokadem, H., L. Crespel, J. Meynet & S. Gudin, 2002a. The occurrence of 2 n-pollen and the origin of sexual polyploids in dihaploid roses (Rosa hybrida L.). Euphytica 125: 169–177.Google Scholar
  9. El Mokadem, H., J. Meynet & L. Crespel, 2002b. The occurrence of 2 n eggs in the dihaploids derived from Rosa hybrida L. Euphytica 124: 327–332.Google Scholar
  10. Erlanson, E.W. 1931. A group of tetraploid roses in central Oregon. Bot Gaz 91: 55–64.Google Scholar
  11. Esau, K., 1977. Anatomy of Seed Plants. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Hansen, A.L., A. Gertz, M. Joersbo & S. B. Anderson, 1998. Antimicrotubule herbicides for in vitro chromosome doubling in Beta vulgaris L. ovule culture. Euphytica 101: 231–237.Google Scholar
  13. Hansen, N.J.P. & S.B. Anderson, 1998. Efficient production of doubled haploid wheat plants by in vitro treatment of microspores with trifluralin or APM. Plant Breed 117: 401–405.Google Scholar
  14. Hassawi, D.S. & G.H. Liang, 1991. Antimitotic agents: Effects on double haploid production in wheat. Crop Sci 31: 723–726.Google Scholar
  15. Horst, R.K., 1983. Compendium of Rose Diseases, APS Press, St. Paul, Minnesota.%Google Scholar
  16. Kermani, M.J., V. Sarasan, A.V. Roberts, A. Yokoya, J. Wentworth & V.K. Sieber, 2003. Oryzalin-induced chromosome doubling in Rosa and its effects on plant morphology and pollen viability. Theor Appl Genet 107: 1195–1200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Krüssmann, G., 1981. The Complete Book of Roses, Timber Press, Portland, Oregon.Google Scholar
  18. Luckett, D.J., 1989. Colchicine mutagenesis is associated with substantial heritable variation in cotton. Euphytica 42: 177–182.Google Scholar
  19. Ma, Y., D.H. Byrne & J. Chen, 1997. Amphidiploid induction from diploid rose interspecific hybrids. Hort Sci 32: 292–295.Google Scholar
  20. Ma, Y., C.F. Crane & D.H. Byrne, 2000. Meiotic behavior in a tetraploid rose and its hybrids. Hort Sci 35: 1127–1131.Google Scholar
  21. Ramulu, K.S., H.A. Verhoeven & P. Dijkhuis, 1991. Mitotic blocking, micronucleation, and chromosome doubling by oryzalin, amiprophos-methyl, and colchicine in potato. Protoplasma 160: 65–71.Google Scholar
  22. Roberts, A.V., D. Lloyd & K.C. Short, 1990. In vitro procedures for the induction of tetraploidy in a diploid rose. Euphytica 49: 33–38.Google Scholar
  23. Rowley, G.D., 1960. Triploid garden roses. Amer Rose Ann 45: 108–113.Google Scholar
  24. Sanders, M.E. & C.J. Franzke, 1960. Colchicine-induced complex diploid mutants from tetraploid seedlings. J Hered 60: 137–148.Google Scholar
  25. Semeniuk, P. & T. Arisumi, 1968. Colchicine-induced tetraploid and cytochimeral Roses. Bot Gaz 129: 190–193.Google Scholar
  26. Simantel, G.M. & J.G. Ross, 1963. Colchicine-induced somatic chromosome reduction in sorghum. III. Induction of plants homozygous for structural chromosome markers in four pairs. J Hered 54: 277–284.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. SPSS Inc., 1997. Statistical product and service solutions user’s guide, SPSS base 7.5 for windows. SPSS Inc. Chicago.Google Scholar
  28. Tai, G.C.C. & H. DeJong, 1997. A comparison of performance of tetraploid progenies produced by diploid and their vegetatively doubled (tetraploid) counterpart parents. Theor Appl Genet 94: 303–308.Google Scholar
  29. Tilney-Bassett, R.A.E., 1986. Plant Chimeras. Edward Arnold, London, UK.Google Scholar
  30. Tomlin, C.D.S. (Ed.), 1997. The Pesticide Manual. British Crop Protection Council, Surry, U.K.Google Scholar
  31. United States Department of Agriculture, 2004. Floriculture crops 2003 summary. Sp Cr 6-1 (04) a,
  32. von Malek, B. & T. Debener, 1998. Genetic analysis of resistance to black spot (Diplocarpon rosae) in tetraploid roses. Theor Appl Genet 96: 228–231.Google Scholar
  33. Wan, Y., D.R. Duncan, A.L. Rayburn, J.F. Petolino & J.M. Widholm, 1991. The use of antimicrotubule herbicides for the production of doubled haploids plants from anther-derived maize callus. Theor Appl Genet 81: 205–211.Google Scholar
  34. Wright, P.H., 1947. The interactions of various rose species. Am Rose Ann 32: 169–172.Google Scholar
  35. Zlesak, D.C. & C.A. Thill, 2002. Variation for 2 n pollen production and male fertility in wild Solanum germplasm resistant to Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary (US8). Am J Potato Res 79: 219–229.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • David C. Zlesak
    • 1
  • Christian A. Thill
    • 1
  • Neil O. Anderson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Horticultural SciencesUniversity of MinnesotaU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations