European Journal of Population

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 99–128 | Cite as

Gender Roles, Comparative Advantages and the Life Course: The Division of Domestic Labor in Same-Sex and Different-Sex Couples

Article

Abstract

Lesbian and gay couples by definition cannot establish sex-specific divisions of domestic tasks, at least not literally. Previous research has shown that high levels of equality characterize domestic work arrangements in same-sex couples. This study scrutinizes explanations for this. The theoretical background stems from family economics, from the theory of relative resources and from gender role and life-course considerations. The empirical analysis is based upon the Generations and Gender Survey from Austria, Belgium, France, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden and Australia. Results show that same-sex partners engage in more tasks equally, that their housework-sharing pattern is less segregated and that the partners’ workload is more equally balanced. Comparative advantages, life-course differences and gender roles contribute to the explanation of higher levels of equality in same-sex compared to different-sex relationships.

Keywords

Division of housework Same-sex couples Family economics Gender roles 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to Henning Best, Tim Birkenbach, Norman Braun, Josef Brüderl, Freya Gassmann, Marita Jacob, Thorsten Kneip and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Andersson, G., Noack, T., Seierstad, A., & Weedon-Fekjær, H. (2006). The demographics of same-sex marriages in Norway and Sweden. Demography, 43(1), 79–98. doi: 10.1353/dem.2006.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauer, G. (2015). Graphical display of regression results. In H. Best & C. Wolf (Eds.), The Sage handbook of regression analysis and causal inference (pp. 205–224). Los Angelos, London, New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Baxter, J., Hewitt, B., & Haynes, M. (2008). Life course transitions and housework: Marriage, parenthood and time on housework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 259–272. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00479.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baxter, J., Hewitt, B., & Haynes, M. (2010). Pathways into marriage: Cohabitation and the domestic division of labor. Journal of Family Issues, 31(11), 1507–1529. doi: 10.1177/0192513X10365817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, G. S. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Biblarz, T. J., & Savci, E. (2010). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 480–497. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00714.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bittman, M., England, P., Folbre, N., Sayer, L., & Matheson, G. (2003). When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 186–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Black, D. A., Sanders, S. G., & Taylor, L. J. (2007). The economics of lesbian and gay families. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands & wives—The dynamics of married living (2 Auflage ed.). New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
  10. Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1983). American couples. Money, work, sex. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
  11. Browning, M., Chiappori, P.-A., & Weiss, Y. (2014). Economics of the family. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Chan, R. W., Brooks, R. C., Raboy, B., & Patterson, C. J. (1998). Division of labor among lesbian and heterosexual parents: Associations with children’s adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology, 12(3), 402–419. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.12.3.402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage an the Family, 62, 1208–1233. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01208.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davies, L., & Carrier, P. J. (1999). The importance of power relations for the division of household labour. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 24(1), 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Evertsson, M., & Nermo, M. (2007). Changing resources and the division of housework: A longitudinal study of Swedish couples. European Sociological Review, 23(4), 455–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farr, R. H., & Patterson, C. J. (2013). Coparenting among lesbian, gay, and heterosexual couples: Associations with adopted children’s outcomes. Child Development, 84(4), 1226–1240. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grunow, D., Schulz, F., & Blossfeld, H. P. (2012). What determines change in the division of housework over the course of marriage? International Sociology, 27(3), 289–307. doi: 10.1177/0268580911423056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haas, L. (1981). Domestic role sharing in Sweden. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43(4), 957–967. doi: 10.2307/351351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heaphy, B., Donovan, C., & Weeks, J. (2002). Sex, money and the kitchen sink. In S. Jackson, & S. Scott (Eds.), Gender. A Sociological Reader (pp. 248–258, Routledge Student Readers). London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Höpflinger, F., & Charles, M. (1990). Innerfamiliale Arbeitsteilung: Mikro-soziologische Erklärungsansätze und empirische Beobachtungen. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 2, 87–113.Google Scholar
  21. Iyigun, M., & Walsh, R. P. (2007). Endogenous gender power, household labour supply and the demographic transition. Journal of Development Economics, 82, 138–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kneip, T., Bauer, G., & Reinhold, S. (2014). Direct and indirect effects of unilateral divorce law on marital stability. Demography, 51(6), 2103–2126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kroska, A. (2004). Divisions of domestic work. Revising and expanding the theoretical explanations. Journal of Family Issues, 25(7), 900–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kurdek, L. A. (1993). The allocation of household labor in gay, lesbian, and heterosexual married couples. Journal of Social Issues, 49(3), 127–139. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb01172.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kurdek, L. A. (2004). Are gay and lesbian cohabiting couples really different from heterosexual married couples? Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 880–900. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00060.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kurdek, L. A. (2007). The allocation of household labor by partners in gay and lesbian couples. Journal of Family Issues, 28(1), 132–148. doi: 10.1177/0192513x06292019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lau, C. Q. (2012). The stability of same-sex cohabitation, different-sex cohabitation, and marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 973–988. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.01000.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lindenberg, S. (1985). An assessment of the new political economy: Its potential for the social sciences and for sociology in particular. Sociological Theory, 3, 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Loving, T. J., Heffner, K. L., Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Glaser, R., & Malarkey, W. B. (2004). Stress hormone changes and marital conflict: Spouses’ relative power makes a difference. Journal of Marriage an the Family, 66, 595–612. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00040.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Martínez, C., Paterna, C., & Yago, C. (2010). Justifications and comparisons in the division of household labor: The relevance of gender ideology. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13(1), 220–231. doi: 10.1017/S1138741600003802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McWhirter, D. P., & Mattison, A. M. (1984). The male couple. How relationships develop. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall Inc.Google Scholar
  32. Moore, M. R. (2008). Gendered power relations among woman: A study of household decision making in Black, lesbian stepfamilies. American Sociological Review, 73, 335–356. doi: 10.1177/000312240807300208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Neyer, G., Lappegård, T., & Vignoli, D. (2013). Gender equality and fertility: Which equality matters? European Journal of Population, 29, 245–272. doi: 10.1007/s10680-013-9292-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Oerton, S. (1997). “Queer housewives?”: Some problems in theorising the division of domestic labour in lesbian and gay households. Women’s Studies International Forum, 20(3), 421–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Patterson, C. J. (1995). Families of the lesbian baby boom: Parent’s division of labor and children’s adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 31(1), 115–123. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.31.1.115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Poortman, A.-R., & van der Lippe, T. (2009). Attitudes toward housework and child care and the gendered division of labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 526–541. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00617.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reinhold, S., Kneip, T., & Bauer, G. (2013). The long run consequences of unilateral divorce laws on children—evidence from SHARELIFE. Journal of Population Economics, 26(3), 1035–1056. doi: 10.1007/s00148-012-0435-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schulz, F. (2010). Verbundene Lebensläufe. Partnerwahl und Arbeitsteilung zwischen neuen Ressourcenverhältnissen und traditionellen Geschlechterrrollen (Life Course Research). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  39. Schwartz, C. R., & Graf, N. L. (2009). Assortative matching among same-sex and different-sex couples in the United States, 1999–2000. Demographic Research, 21(28), 843–878. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2009.21.28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Solomon, S. E., Rothblum, E. D., & Balsam, K. F. (2004). Pioneers in partnership: Lesbian and gay male couples in civil unions compared with those not in civil unions and married heterosexual siblings. Journal of Family Psychology, 18(2), 275–286. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.18.2.275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Solomon, S. E., Rothblum, E. D., & Balsam, K. F. (2005). Money, housework, sex, and conflict: Same-sex couples in civil unions, those not in civil unions, and heterosexual married siblings. Sex Roles, 52(9+10), 561–575. doi: 10.1007/s11199-005-3725-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. South, S. J., & Spitze, G. (1994). Housework in marital and nonmarital household. American Sociological Review, 59(3), 327–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sullivan, O. (2000). The division of domestic labour: Twenty years of change. Sociology, 34(3), 437–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sutphin, S. (2013). The division of child care tasks in same-sex couples. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 9(5), 474–491. doi: 10.1080/1550428x.2013.826043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vergauwen, J., Wood, J., De Wachter, D., & Neels, K. (2015). Quality of demographic data in GGS Wave 1. Demographic Research, 32(723–774), 2015. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.32.24.Google Scholar
  46. West, C., & Zimmermann, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 125–151. doi: 10.1177/0891243287001002002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Weziak-Bialowolska, D. (2015). Differences in gender norms between countries: Are they valid? The issue of measurement invariance. European Journal of Population, 31, 51–76. doi: 10.1007/s10680-014-9329-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of Munich (LMU)MunichGermany

Personalised recommendations