Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 591–602 | Cite as

A Moral Argument Against Moral Realism

  • Melis Erdur


If what is morally right or wrong were ultimately a function of our opinions, then even such reprehensible actions as genocide and slavery would be morally right, had we approved of them. Many moral philosophers find this conclusion objectionably permissive, and to avoid it they posit a moral reality that exists independently of what anyone thinks. The notion of an independent moral reality has been subjected to meticulous metaphysical, epistemological and semantic criticism, but it is hardly ever examined from a moral point of view. In this essay I offer such a critique. I argue that the appeal to an independent moral reality as a ground for moral obligations constitutes a substantive moral mistake. However, I do not conclude from this that we must therefore embrace the opposite view that moral truths are ultimately dependent on our attitudes. Rather, I suggest that we reject both of these views and answer the classic meta-ethical question “Is what we morally ought to do ultimately a function of our actual attitudes, or determined independently of them?” with Neither.


Morality Realism Anti-realism Metaethics Grounding Objectivity 



I am grateful to David Velleman, Sharon Street, Hartry Field, and David Enoch, for extensive comments on earlier versions of this paper. I have also greatly benefited from conversations with Ayca Boylu, and from the feedback I received at presentations at the philosophy departments of Johns Hopkins University, New York University, University of Illinois at Chicago, Colgate University, Bogazici University, Hebrew University, Tel Aviv University, as well as at the 2015 British Society for Ethics Conference at the University of Southampton.


  1. Blackburn S (1988) How to be an ethical antirealist. Midwest Stud Philos 12:361–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyd R (1988) How to be a moral realist. In: Sayre-McCord G (ed) Essays on moral realism. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp. 181–228Google Scholar
  3. Brink D (2001) Realism, naturalism, and moral semantics. Soc Philos Policy 18:154–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dworkin R (1996) Objectivity and truth: you’d better believe it. Philos Public Aff 25(2):87–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dworkin R (2011) Justice for hedgehogs. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Enoch D (2011) Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Foot P (2001) Natural goodness. Clarendon Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harman G ((1977) The nature of morality: An introduction to ethics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Harman G (1986) Moral explanations of natural facts: Can moral claims be tested against moral reality?” In N. Gillespie (ed.) Spindel Conference: Moral Realism. South J Philos 24:57–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kant, I (2012) Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, New York, Cambridge University Press; 2nd editionGoogle Scholar
  11. Kramer M (2009) Moral realism as a moral doctrine. Wiley-Blackwell, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mackie JL (1977) Ethics: inventing right and wrong. Penguin, HarmondsworthGoogle Scholar
  13. Mill, JS (2002) Utilitarianism. Indianapolis, Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 2nd editionGoogle Scholar
  14. Nagel T (2001) The last word. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Railton P (1989) Naturalism and prescriptivity. Soc Philos and Policy 95:51–174Google Scholar
  16. Scanlon T (2014) Being Realistic About Reasons, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shafer-Landau R (2003) Moral realism: A defence. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Street S (2010) What is constructivism in ethics and metaethics. Philos Compass 5(5):363–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Edmond J. Safra Center for EthicsTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations