Advertisement

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 457–468 | Cite as

Standards, Perspectives, and the Meaning of Life: A Reply to Seachris

  • Iddo Landau
Article

Introduction

In a recent article in this journal, Joshua W. Seachris (2012) argues that the distinction I make between perspectives and standards in sub specie aeternitatis arguments for the meaninglessness of life does not hold for a salient component of the sub specie aeternitatis perspective: the ontological-normative component. In this article I suggest that Seachris’s argument is problematic in a number of ways and ought to be rejected.

Background

Various authors, such as Albert Camus (1969, p. 78), Nicholas Rescher (1990, p. 153) and Simon Blackburn (2001, p. 79), have argued that when lives are considered as a part of very large temporal or spatial contexts, they are realized to be meaningless. Considered in the context of a million years, whatever one chooses or achieves in a life or even the fact that one has existed seems unimportant: the world would be the same in a million years whether or not we had existed and whatever we might or might not have done. Our effect on the...

Keywords

Meaning of life Pessimism Standards Sub specie aeternitatis Value theory 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I am very grateful to Saul Smilansky and two anonymous referees for Ethical Theory and Moral Practice for extremely helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

References

  1. Blackburn S (2001) Being good. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Brill S (2007) Does it matter that nothing we do will matter in a million years? Dialogue 46(1):3–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Camus A (1969) The myth of Sisyphus. Trans. J O’Brien, Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Cottingham J (2003) On the meaning of life. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Floridi L (2011) The philosophy of information. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Landau I (2011) The meaning of life sub specie aeternitatis. Australas J Philos 89(4):727–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nagel T (1986) Birth, death, and the meaning of life. In: The view from nowhere. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 208–31Google Scholar
  8. Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Rescher N (1990) Human interests: Reflections on philosophical anthropology. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Russell B (1957) A free man’s worship. In: Why I am not a Christian. Touchstone, New York, pp. 104–116Google Scholar
  11. Sartre JP (1956) In: Barnes HE (ed) Being and nothingness: An essay on phenomenological ontology. Philosophical Library, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Seachris JW (2012) The sub specie aeternitatis perspective and normative evaluations of life’s meaningfulness: a closer look. Ethic Theory Moral Prac. doi: 10.1007/s10677-012-9379-y Google Scholar
  13. Smith Q (1991) Concerning the absurdity of life. Philos 66(255):119–121Google Scholar
  14. Spinoza B (2000) In: Parkinson GHR (ed) Ethics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Taylor R (1970) The meaning of life. In: Good and evil. Macmillan, London, pp. 256–268Google Scholar
  16. Trisel BA (2004) Human extinction and the value of our efforts. Philos Forum 35:371–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wittgenstein L (1969) In: Anscombe GEM (ed) Notebooks 1914–1916. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Wolf S (2010) Meaning in life and why it matters. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyHaifa UniversityHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations